IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY 133 munication needs of the community For if, as another re- port in this Inquiry series suggests,* the book industry in this country is becoming increasingly commercialized, with an at- tendant lowering of critical standards, this definition of the public library function becomes all the more appropriate. By so doing the public library might well take upon itself a dis- tinctive role in the community’s pattern of communication. In a real sense, the title of this book is a misnomer. There is no such thing as “the library’s public.” In the first place, the eligible population of the community is the library’s public only in a legal sense, certainly not in a substantive socio-psy- chological sense. By this definition, the library’s public 7y use the public library, but it does not, and within the next years it will not. In the second place, the clientele of the li- brary does not represent a public in a meaningful sense. There is no single public of library users; there are several publics. This is not simply a nice semantic dlstlnctlon It i1s central to the problem of the values and the objectives of public library service; it is the key to the “philosophy of public librarian- ship.” %he several publics of the library are the several distinctive groups which make distinctive demands for library materials. There is a public of high school students who mainly want from the public library what their school libraries cannot adequately supply. There is a public mainly composed of housewives and white collar workers who want “some light reading.” There is a public of business representatives who want specific and isolated pieces of information from the li- brary files. There is a public of ambitious young people who hope to use the library in their drive for occupational mobility. There is a public of serious-minded people concerned with serious-minded materials on a variety of topics who find in the library what they cannot get elsewhere. There is a public of ‘William Miller, The Book Industry.