Such a scheme would have very real benefits, though its detailed implementation would obviously be difficult. It would pressure every organisation and institution to work to agreed schedules and dates, and indeed, in time, ways could be found to force these schedules to be tightened. It would furthermore give every institution a very real incentive to maintain clear and ac- cessible records since any ‘claim’ that could not be refuted by the presentation of appropriate documents would be lost by default. There is no doubt that any such arrangement will in the end fail if there are not sufficient people and institutions to support them actively, but it could be argued that the system itself should create groups that have an interest to make it work. Indeed, in the final analysis this must extend to the less mechanical tasks of ministries and other institutions. It is clear that Devplan's major task emanating from the second plan was the development of a long- term industrial strategy. It is also clear that its failure to do so four years after the commencement of the plan has been very serious. It is finally clear that some people are ‘responsible’ for these failures and it is necessary to institute machinery, through TANU, which assesses and evaluates the work of Government in- stitutions. This paper has described opportunities of engaging workers in a constructive political debate and in a political process which not only would have given scope and content to the concept of workers participation in an industry, but also would have begun to make the planning process accountable to those whom it should serve. Unfortunately none of these opportunities were utilised, either through the mechanisms suggested here or in any other way. The dispute was dealt with like any other dispute: the ‘worker’ were treated as ‘workers’, which meant as people who make selfish demands and who must be appeased or lectured and intimidated; the managers were treated as managers, which meant as the people who are ‘responsible’ for production, profits and the workers; the Government behaved like the Government, which meant it concerned itself with keeping things quiet. 130