accounting system was in confusion. No uniform control system had been established on building sites, and each individual site manager was using his own method. There were twenty ex- patriate staff in the company, and the management was about to introduce more (they had advertised for a foreman carpenter in Holland). Meanwhile the best local staff were leaving.” The com- pany was making serious losses. Since many N.D.C. companies have long traditions of loss- making, and N.D.C. has used the profits on its profitable monopoly companies to cover these losses, this situation could have gone on for a long time without Government intervention.® However, in August 1969 N.D.C. was split up and MECCO now came under the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development. There was now no source of funds which could be used to cover the losses, so the company became dependent on its overdraft at the National Bank of Commerce, and it soon became clear to the Bank that this overdraft was rapidly growing. In November 1969, in response to pressure from the Ministry of Lands, measures of economy were taken. Ten expatriates, in- cluding the General Manager, were transferred out of the com- pany, and replaced by five others (so at least five members of the expatriate ‘team’ were dispenseble). Steps were taken to establish some kind of system of cost control. The (virtually non-existent) training programme was officially ‘suspended’ in the interests of economy. But the Government concern continued. Facts were uncovered to show that although MECCO was showing losses, O.C.C., the managing agent, was doing pretty well out of it all in Holland. In addition to the 1 % of turnover and payment of expatriate salaries, there was evidence of over-invoicing — i.e. goods were being pur- chased in Holland that could have been purchased more cheaply elsewhere. Even more serious was the ease of the contract for the factory building for General Tyres Ltd., (an N.D.C. investment in partnership with General Tyres of America) where 0.C.C. was found to be using MECCO to get business for its Dutch parent company. Several local firms had submitted tenders for the factory buildings and MECCO’s had not been the lowest bid. However, General Tyre had subsequently contacted O.C.C. in Holland and suggested that they (0.C.C.) should re-design and build the factory at a lower price. However there was a clause in the management 93