Fernando M. Reimers et al. of action of these programs, which assumes that bringing people together alone contributes to international understanding. 3. New Calls for Global Education in the United States Today The mediocre performance of American students in international compara— tive assessments of students’ knowledge and skills, such as the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), and the acceleration of global— ization have resulted in the evolution of a global education discourse that seeks to make American children and classrooms more globally oriented, aware, and prepared for the challenges of twenty—first—century citizenship and work— places (Council of Foreign Relations, 2012; Di Giacomo, Fishbein, Monthey, 86 Pack, 2013). Much of this discourse has translated into internationalizing state standards and the Common Core and ensuring that American graduates are as well, if not more, prepared than their peers in other countries in the core subjects of language, mathematics, and science (Reimers 85 Villegas-Reimers, 2014). This has also resulted in growing interests in supporting students with greater knowledge about the world and about globalization and teaching them relevant skills, as reflected in an unprecedented move by the US Department of Education, which adopted an international education strategy. This strat— egy defines a “globally competent student” as one who can investigate the world, weigh perspectives, communicate effectively with diverse audiences, and take action (US Department of Education, 2012). Echoing similar themes, a recent report of the College Board calls attention to what may be the biggest challenge facing the United States in the coming decades. As other countries become increasingly competi— tive through rising levels of interaction in the globalized economy, the US is faced with the challenge of retaining the competitive advantage it has built through decades of economic growth. If the XI