INTRODUCTION þihui of Fracastorius in 1555. It is divided into fourteen sections, and gives a historical aecount of the theories on this subject from Thales down to his own time, the reports of contempo— raneous explorers, and finally, his own theory, which is based on the position of the Nile regions in relation to the sun. The Letters His Letters, especially those addressed to Rannusio, are the most useful source, apart from Homocentrica, for the scientific interests, other than medical, of Fracastorius. 'They were not consulted by Mencke, who regrets that he was unable to obtain them; this is the chief defect of his Biography. Humboldt, who had read Fracastorius with care, in his Kosmos (1844) twice refers with respect to his acute geological observations. Geology In the first passage (p. 379 of ed 1869), he says that, in 1517, Fraeastorius investigated certain rock strata that had been uncovered on Monte Bolea near Verona, revealing numerous marine fossils, and did not fail to recognise '"das Dasein einer untergangenen oceanischen 'Thierwelt in ihren hinterlassenen Spuren'; again, p. 910, he says that Fracastorius made similar observations in the quarries near the citadel of San Felice. In both passages, Humboldt classes him with Leonardo da Vinci as far in advance of the geological knowledge of his day. For then such remains were ascribed to Noah'!s Flood or to some caprice of Nature, whereas he definitely attributed them to secular changes of elevation in land and water.' Favorite Authors His biographers persist in stating that his favorite authors were Polybius and Plutarch, but I see no evidence of this in : See Homocentrica I. 12, for his statement of this; and the letter to T. Saraina, a Veronese lawyer who had asked him to explain the marine fossils of the neighboring mountains.* Humboldt does not mention the specilla ocwlaria of Homocentrica as & forerunner of the telescope, and says that we cannot find any use of a telescope in the modern sense before 1608. Olschki, Geschichiöe der Neu— sprachlichen Wissenschafllichen Literatur, Vol. II. p. 43, says that Fracastorius is the first to mention the telescope, €denn worauf es ankommt [i. e. the importance of Cardan's camera obscura or the lenses of Fracastorius] ist nicht das eine oder das andere Instrument, sondern die Art und Weise, wie es benutzt und der Zweck, wofür es verwertet wird'.