THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN AH© JOURNAL OF THE COAL AND IRON TRADES. Vol. CXVI. FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 1918. No. 3021. Some Unique Methods of Working Coal Seams * By R. W. Perhaps one of the most difficult problems that has had to be d«~alt with during the present year is the acute shortage of coal, and what has happened in recent days will not bring us instant relief from this shortage. At the present time an attempt is being made to ration all kinds of fuel, whether in the shape of coal and coke, or in gas and electricity; and coal has been rationed, in much leaner quantities, in practically all Continental countries tor the last three or four years; whilst some idea of its price in some of those countries may be formed from the charges for sea freightage, which varies at the present time from about £2 10s. per ton for French Channel ports to £10 per ton for Port Said. The general excuse for our shortage is that too many men have been taken from the mines; and there is much truth in this But there is another factor of equal importance, and of even greater significance, namely, the con inual decline in output per person employed, and it does not seem sure that as much has been done as might have been to improve this individual output. In making comparisons many people who ought to know better insist on com| aring our returns with the returns from other countries, their favourite country to quote being, of course, the United States, where conditions are, to say the least, more favourable than in the Wigan district. It is not fair to make comparisons between such widely different conditions. For example, last year even the Yorkshire Division had an output of 80 tons per annum per person employed underground greater than the Lancashire division, which without doubt was due to the more favourable natural conditions. The true comparison ought to be our own returns year by year in each of our divided districts. The table gives a return for the years 1907 and 1917, the figures being arranged to show the output in tons per annum per person employed underground, without taking any account of persons employed on the surface. The loss of output per person in the 10 years is to be 47’2 tons, which, on the number of persons employed underground in the year 1917, is equal to 811,510 multiplied by 47’2, or a total of 38,303,272 tons. Year 1907. Year 1917. Difference. No. of persons under- ground. Output. Output per head. No. of persons under- ground. Output. Output per head. Scotland Tons. Tons. Tons. Tons. 101,766 40,092,548 394 102,205 i 34,245,744 335 -59 Northern 161,038 56,243,456 355 152,068 ; 43, 28,230 284 . -71 York and North Midland — — — 192,040 69.128,836 360 Lancas ire and North Wales 87,371 30,034,598 344 89,512 25,204,560 282 -62 South Wales 121,351 36,7b2,508 303 184,633 ,48,507,902 263 -40 Midland and Southern — — — 90,397 28,062,201 310 1 1 Average ... 353’4 Average ... 306’2 i The question arises “ How are we going to improve on these figures ? ” In recent years machinery has been brought more and more into use, particularly in holing the face and in conveying the coal along the face, but we still lag a long way behind. One con- tinually meets with cases where output is sacrificed for want of power to replace manual labour—the hard seam still being holed by hand, shot holes in cross-measure stone drifts still being drilled by hand—and the need of an auxiliary haulage system to keep pace with the advancing roads, and to dispense with such old relics as “ mangles,” crabs, etc. Speaking of the average mine, there is not much doubt that, next to the actual cost of getting, the cost of transporting the coal from the face to the haulage road is one of the most expensive items in underground woi king; and th s is perhaps one of the most laborious kinds of work underground, especially in those collieries where the gradient is fairly steep, or the haulage roads are too few. In some of the examples taken it will be explained how a lot of this class of work has been dispensed with. The drawings are given as approximate details to illustrate the system, and are not intended to represent the district to any given scale. Two examples each of thin, moderately thick, and thick seams, have been chosen. Generally speaking, the thinner the seam the nearer the roads have to be set out. Figs. 1, 2 and 3 show an example, which is an exception to the general rule, inso- much as though the seam is only from 2 ft. to 2 ft. 3 in. thick, yet the gateways are set out 100 yds. apart. In the level gateway s horse haul ge is used from the face, while the rise roads are made into jig brows. Each gateway employs 14 or 15 persons, of which eight or * From an address to the Past and Present Mining Students’ Association, Wigan and District Mining and Technical College, on November 16. CORLESS. nine are constantly engaged in taking out the metal between the coal and the rock, which varies from 15 to 18 in. in thickness. This metal completely fills the goaf, allowing little subsidence, while a ripping of rock makes excellent building stone for then>ad sides. Alter the meial has I een taken off for a depth of about 5 ft., the coal < an be lifted in such condition that the greater part of it can be filled by hand, without any shot firing, the percentage of round coal being well over 90 per cent. Another peculiarity to be noted is the method of conveying the coal to the ga'e-end. Small trucks with a loose frame top are used along the faces, which, as far as possible, are arranged along the level line of the seam. Boys commencing work underground (at the age of 14 to 16), run these trucks, which carry from 3 to 4 cwt. When the truck drops off the rails at the gate-<-nd, the coal, together with the loose frame top, slides off the sheet iron bottom, the boy pulling back the frame and gigi ed to take up as small an area as possible, so as not to leave too much roof untimbered. All debris made in roof repait s and in tunnell ng is sent inbye, and the space between the brows is packed solid. The coal being left on each side was intended to be opened out when the end of the war released a sufficient number of men. Fig. 4 illustrates a system of auxiliary haulages from the face of every place in the district, and the system has been applied to both rise and dip workings, the only difference being that a tail rope is required as well as a main rope in a rise district. The system is worked with a single line of rails in each gate road, the gates being 20 yards apart, with cross roads every 140 yards. Each road has six to eight tubs at the face end, the full tubs being brought out first, then the empties run in, Fig. 1. a Fig. 2. Tub with Loose Frame Top—used on face roads. Fig. 3. Figs. 1 to 3.—Working Thin Seams with Gateways 100 yds. apart. and the rope connections being made to wherever next required. The roads are arranged so that there is a difference of 10 yards between the lengths of rope required in each successive road. When No. 1’gate has reached the new cross road, the rope in this gate is removed to No. 2 gate, and the adjustment follows system aticaly as the face advances uniformly. A pair of engines with three haulage hands are capable of dealing with 100 tons per shift. The return wheels are of steel, and being light are easily removed. The case illustrated by figs. 5 and 6 presents several interesting features. In the first place the seam is of unusual thickness, and several methods of working had been tried all with more or less success. Taking first the case of a district worked to rise, the main roads are first carried to within 150 yards of the boundary as a narrow road, an emiless rope haulage road being set out parallel to the boundary line. After the top poition of the seam (3 it. 3in) has been worked out. panels of work are set out in the bottom port on of the seam (9 feet). A longwall chain machine holes the coal 10 to 20 yards at a time as requiied (no cutting shift being required . All the goaf is packed solid, the debris and empty tubs all being pulled up the right hand brow, emptied and packed along the face, and then the same tub fi led with coal is passed down the left-hand brow. This brow is fitted with an uncommon t\pe of haulage, there being an * ndless rope with a single lir e of rails. The rope passes H tim^s round both top and bottom pulleys and the rope pulled tight. The tubs (full) are sent down in two’s attached with a back chain to the rope and nothing passes upbrow except a lashing chain to send down the next set. About 400 tubs per shift have been sent down this brow. The output is regularised to the amount of debris that could be found for stowing the goaf, and with the tubs filled about half full of debris experience has proved that approximately 600 tubs half filled with debris are required for each 1,000 tubs of coal sent out. In another district of the same seam an attempt is being made to work the seam with one subsidence, and a more equal division of the thickness. Three brows have been driven down about 200 yds. in the form of wide bays, with packs on each side; at this point a face was opened out across the three brows in the lower 6 ft. of the seam, there being several well-defined part- ings in the seam. This face was advanced about 20 yds. upbrow, whereupon a face was opened out in the upper