June 21, 1918. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN, 1249 the konimeter: (1) The small quantity of air used to form the sample. (2) The danger of contamination in changing the slides. (3) The difficulty of count- ing, especially when oil and soot are present in the air. (4) The failure of the konimeter to make a dust spot on all occasions. (5) The difficulty of making standard instruments. (6) The labour involved in counting the dust particles. (7) The personal factor introduced in counting. These objections will be dealt with in turn. 1. The quantity of air used to form a sample is immaterial, provided that the amount used is repre- sentative of the air in the immediate neighbourhood. The nature of the air itself, its continual movement, etc., allows for the fairly equal distribution of the injurious dust in a short time, even assuming that this dust is incapable of producing an equal distri- bution on its own account. Samples taken at intervals in air with a more or less constant dust content, such as upcast air in a shaft, give spots with practically the same count, proving that a 5 cc. sample is quite sufficient. In places where a variable amount of dust is being produced, a variable count is obtained in different spots as would be expected. An unreliable result would be obtained if only one spot were taken under these circumstances, but if a number of spots be taken spread over an interval of, say, five minutes, any error would depend not so much upon the amount of air which formed the samples, but upon how far the dust sampled during this time was representative of the dust produced during the shift. 2. Contamination in changing the slides is rare. If it is known to have occurred underground, a fresh set of spots may be taken. Contamination is more likely to take place in coating the slides with vaseline, but it can then be detected before the slides are used. Even if it does occur, the effect may be eliminated in most cases by determining the average amount near the spots, and by making the necessary sub- traction from the count. 3. Oil has never been noticed even when artificial pieans were adopted to produce it. Carbon sometimes occurs in samples from badly ventilated places, and is shown as large grey granular masses when dark ground illumination is used, and is easily recognised.* 4. Failure to make a dust spot. The best answer to this objection is to analyse the results obtained at the Ferreira Deep Limited. Since the middle of September a record has been kept of all the samples, even if no spots have been counted on a slide. In the majority of cases the spots have been spoilt in handling the slides, and in others the spots which have been found gave so small a count that the dust in the air may have been insufficient to produce a spot which could be recognised as such. In all these cases the fault is not with the konimeter. The failures may be recorded thus : — On 3 slides — 0 spots were counted. On these slides there should have been a total of 112 spots, and only 61 were found. On five of the slides the average count was 16 particles per cc., so that it is possible that some of the spots escaped detection owing to their small dust content. In the three cases where no spots were found the vaseline was smudged by handling the slide on the surface. Other spots were spoilt by placing cover glasses on the slides before counting. These figures give a rough idea of the loss to be expected from all sources. In all 1,990 puffs gave 1,939 spots, a loss of 2-6 per cent. One case is reported where the loss was over 70 per cent. There is a serious source of error which may account for this extraordinary result. If the flat spring does not cause the glass slide to press evenly all round the rubber ring, a gap is liable to be formed on one side, and air then rushes through this opening instead of up the nozzle. If a very small gap is formed air might also come up the nozzle and form a spot, while the air which passes between the ring and the slide would deposit some of its dust content on "the vaseline. Under these conditions it is possible to have spots which are unreliable, as the quantity of air used is unknown, and contamination which cannot be accounted for, unless this source of error is detected. It is therefore always necessary to test the action of this spring by closing the nozzle and releasing the piston. If there is no leakage the piston will not move, or will do so very slowly. 5. All that is necessary in order to make standard models of the konimeter is to arrange that the volume of air drawn in on each stroke of the piston should be the same and of a known amount, and that the velocity of the air through the nozzle should be within certain wide limits, as mentioned before. The first does not seem difficult to accomplish, while the second can be adjusted at any time by altering the shape of the spring which actuates the piston. The nozzle may vary from 0-5 to 1 mm. in diameter at the small end without producing discordant results, but a diameter of 0-6 mm. is preferable. 6. If six spots have been taken on a slide these can be found and counted in about ten minutes. If during a morning underground the dust sampler takes eight slides of six spots each, or twelve slides of four spots each, he can have all the results worked out on the same day, and all the slides cleaned and coated with vaseline ready for the next day without working over- time. If there have been any breaches of the dust regu- lations which require that a charge should be laid against any person or persons, his report to the manager.can contain the results of the dust sampling, and it can be sent in on the same day that the regu- lations were broken. 7. With but little experience it is found that the counts of the same spots made by two samplers agree within 10 per cent. Mr. Selby, manager, Ferreira Deep Limited, has furnished the results obtained on that mine with the konimeter (Tables A and B). The sampling was done in most cases by the dust sampler of the mine. Table A. Description. bi) .2 a