March 9, 1917. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. 485 SAMPLING DELIVERED GOAL.* By G. S. Pope, Sine© 1906 the plan of purchasing coal on the basis of analysis has been adopted by the United States Govern- ment to a large extent, so that out of a total value approximating 8,000,000 dels, annually, moire than half is purchased under specifications, the samples being examined in the laboratory at the headquarters of the Bureau of Mines, Washington, where over 1,200 samples have been analysed and tested in one month. One of the serious drawbacks to the general adoption of the specification method for the purchase of coal is the difficulty of obtaining at reasonable cost samples of coal that can be considered fairly representative of the commercial product delivered in wagons, railroad cars, or ships. Therefore, the method of taking and preparing- samples for shipment to the laboratory has been given fully as much care as the making of the analyses and tests, and a general plan of collecting samples fairly representative of the delivered coal has been evolved through various modifications and improvements based on experience and increased knowledge of the physical and chemical characteristics of the various coals that are purchased by the Government. The method that is in general use by the Government is described below. In connection with studies of the coal deposits of the country, of the best methods of preventing waste in mining, and of increasing efficiency in the utilisation of coal belonging to or for the use of the Government, geologists and engineers of the United States Geological Survey and of the Bureau of Mines have visited more than 2,500 coal mines scattered through all of the coal- producing States and territories. From, each mine twm to eight or more samples were taken, the number depend- ing upon- the size of the mine and its output. A study of the analyses of these samples and of the samples taken from cars shipped from a number of the same mines shows that the mine samples are, as a rule, of higher grade than the average commercial shipments, parti- cularly with respect to containing a lower percentage of ash, and having a correspondingly higher heating value. This difference is due to the fact that the Government inspector, proceeding on the basis of what can be done by a good miner, usually removes more of the partings of bone, slate, and other extraneous matter from his mine samples than the average miner does in ordinary practice, the aim of the miner being to get the maximum number of tons past the tipple inspection, as his earn- ings are based on his output. The average miner, there- fore, does not always take as much care as he might in rejecting the impurities. The difference may be caused, too, by the presence of pieces of the mine roof and floor in commercial shipments. The Government inspector can readily exclude these from the mine sample, but they often get into the commercial coal as a result of the character of the roof and floor and of the mining methods employed. The efficiency of the tipple inspection and the means employed in rejecting impurities when the coal is loaded into the railroad car are also factors that often largely account for the difference between mine and commercial samples. Most of the samples collected from the mines by the Government inspectors show a higher moisture content than commercial samples, because of the generally moist atmosphere of the mine and. the precaution taken to prevent loss of moisture in the collection, preparation, and analysis of mine samples. When properly taken, the mine samples are of great ‘ value, as they indicate the general character of the coal and the uniformity of the coal bed, and enable one to determine its probable value for any designated purpose, provided due consideration is given to the character' of the partings, the roof, and the floor, and to the possi- bility of pieces from these, being loaded with the com- mercial output. Theory of Sampling. To determine with utmost accuracy the ash content and heating value of a quantity of delivered coal would require the burning of the entire quantity, and special apparatus arranged to measure the total heat liberated, or would require crushing the whole quantity, and reducing it by an elabor ate scheme of successive crush- ings, mixings, and fractional selections to portions weighing approximately Igrm., the minute quantity which the chemist requires for each determination. Either of these procedures is obviously impracticable if the coal is to be used for production of heat and power. The method actually employed is to select portions from all parts of a consignment or delivery of coal, and to systematically reduce the gross sample, obtained by mixing these portions, to quantities that the chemist requires for making ash determinations or that can be burned conveniently in the calorimeter, an apparatus for ■determining the heating value. The gross sample should be so large that the chance admixture of pieces of slate, bone coal, pyrites, or other impurities in.an otherwise representative sample will affect but slightly the final. results. Increasing the size of the gross sample tends* toward accuracy, but the possible increase is limited by the cost of collection and reduction. In reducing the gross sample by successive crushings and halvings or fractional selections, the object is to procure a small laboratory sample that, upon analysis, will give approxi- mately the same results as the gross sample itself, or, in fact, the entire quantity of coal from which the gross sample was obtained. Practical Considerations : Moisture. At one time the specifications used for the purchase of coal were on the British thermal unit “ as received ” basis; that is, payment for delivered coal was directly affected by the moisture content of the sample received by the laboratory; but from experiments made, it is known that the moisture content reported by the labora- tory may be as much as 5 to 10 per cent, lower than that actually contained in excessively wet or high * From United States Bureau of Mines Bulletin 116. moisture coal at the time of weighing. For this reason the Bureau of Mines recommends that the heating value in coal specifications should be on the “ dry coal ” basis. The fact is recognised that the amount of moisture contained in coal produced from day to day from the same mine, or group of mines working the same bed, is largely accidental, and is a matter over which the buyer 'and seller have only slight control. However, in order to place a negative value on high-moisture coals, and to protect the Government against the delivery of coals con- taining excessive amounts of moisture, the specifications require the bidders to specify the maximum moisture content in coal offered. This value becomes the standard of the contract. If coal of uniform British thermal unit “ dry coal ” value is delivered on a contract, the contractor receives the advantage on any delivery in which the moisture content approaches• the maximum specified, because he is paid for the weight of water contained in the coal in excess of a normal amount, whereas if the coal is very dry, containing less than the normal amount of moisture, the purchaser receives the advantage. For example, coal is delivered under a contract in which the standards are 14,300 British thermal units per pound “ dry coal,” and a maximum moisture-content of 3’5 per cent. The heating value of a ton (2,2401b.) of ” dry coal ” would be 32,032,000 British thermal units. Assume that the average moisture content of deliveries for a year is 2-5 per cent., then for every 2,2401b. of ” dry coal ” having a heating value of 32,032,000 British thermal units, the purchaser is required to pay for 56 lb. of water at the same rate per ton a