THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN AND JOURNAL OF THE COAL AND IRON TRADES. ______________________________________ Vol. CXI. FRIDAY, MARCH 31, 1916. __________________________________________________________________ The Calculation of Flywheel Motor=Generator Sets. A description of a new electric hoist installed by the North Butte Mining Company is given by Mr. Franklin Moeller in a paper read before the American Institute of Mining Engineers, to which is added a note on prelimi- nary calculation of flywheel motor-generator sets by Mi-. C. D. Gilpin. This engine is believed to be the. largest electrically- driven hoist in the United States, and is working at the Granite Mountain shaft of the North Butte Mining Company, Butte, Montana. While the weight of rock which is hoisted by this machine is not the largest now being handled by electric mine hoists, the speed of hoist- ing is so, and the combination of the high speed with the heavy load has resulted in a machine of considerable interest to all those actively engaged in mining. The conditions to be met in this installation were as follow :— Weight of rock to be raised per trip, 7 gross tons 15,680 lb Weight of skip ............................... 8,000 lb Weight of cage.............................. 1,8001b ............................. Maximum depth of hoisting ___,................. 4,0001b Diameter of rope............................. 1 i in Total weight suspend“d on one rope from drum 42,00u lb Normal hoisting speed per minute ............ 2,700 ft Maximum hoisting speed, per minute ___............ 3,000 ft. Desired capacity : 200 tons per hour from 4,000 ft. depth. At this mine, where the service requires a combina- tion of high speeds and heavy loads, the’first choice of Fig. 1.—Hoist Room at Granite Shaft. y; fi - I J I equipment is a hoist direct connected to the motor with voltage control. In the present instance1, a first motion hoist with a rhotor-generator flywheel set was chosen as the most desirable equipment. Fig. 1 shows a part of the hoist room with the equipment installed. The. hoist is located 425 ft. from the head frame, the ropes between the head frame sheaves and the drums being supported on sheaves mounted on special towers. The hoist con- sists of two 12 ft. drums fitted with a clutch, post brake and band brake. The drums are mounted on a shaft supported in three bearings, this shaft having a flanged coupling to connect to the motor. The clutches and post brakes are operated by oil cylinders, the pressure being supplied by tin, accumulator and an electrically- , operated pump. The band brakes are operated by hand wheels. The safety devices include :—(1) A mechanism for moving the control lever to the “ off ” position when the skip has reached a pre-determined point, holding the lever in this position until the reverse lever has been moved to the opposite position, the operator being thereby prevented from starting in the wrong direction. (2) Two solenoids which automatically apply the post brake if the skip is carried too far after the current has been cut oft'. An indicator with large dial is provided for each drum; for accurately spotting the skip or cage the brake rings on the drums next to the middle bearing are extended 8 in., affording a large surface on which to paint marks. The drums are 12 ft. in diameter by 9 ft. 4 in. face, grooved to hold 5,000 ft. of If in. rope in two layers. The clutches are designed to take a load of 50,0001b. on a 12 ft. diameter, with a factor of safety on all parts of not less than 8. The clutches are of the flat friction type, consisting of two heavily ribbed annular rings, faced with wood, supported on a six-armed spider keyed 3800 2800 2400 920 640 000 276 3480 3430 3130 ijiooo 1700^ if1 —35 Sec.- 1596 1370 - 2250 FL-80.6 Sec.— 670 <1275 16 Sec. OJ £ o CL v O Fig. 4.—Power Curve at 10 per Cent, below Normal Speed. indicated, based on assumed values for demand and meter charges. Calculations made from these curves indicate for the 1,000 ft. level that a 90,0001b. wheel will be required, while for the 3,000 ft. level a 111,000 lb. wheel will be necessary, a minimum time of 15 seconds being allowed for loading in each ease. In these calculations the slip was taken at 20 per cent. ■ Finally, there are many instances in which a short inspection of the load cycle and the powfer contract will make it certain that a flywheel system is necessary. Just how much of the peak if is desirable to cut off is not so easily determined. The following method of calculation may, perhaps, be of interest. A curve should be plotted, similar to the one shown in solid lines on fig. 5, this curve to represent the power at the flywheel shaft. The peak cost per horse-power per trip (C,) should next be determined by dividing the peak charge per horse-power per month by the probable number of trips per month, allowing for the losses in the alternating-current motor. The current charge (C2) per horse-power-second should be figured. It is obvious that the acceleration peak of the curve will be comparatively easy to do away with, and this point should be first considered. Assuming a constant maximum slip, s, for the flywheel (expressed as a decimal fraction of normal speed), and calling the weight