166 THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. January 28, 1916. (500 b.h.p.) that the plain steel plate was found to be unworkable, and the outcome was the introduction of the water-cooled sliding plate. In the 250 b.h.p. pro- ducer a single water-colled plate is used, and in the 500 b.h.p. size two water-cooled plates are employed, both plates working towards the centre of the fire. The single water-cooled plate has holes of a certain diameter distributed over the surface of the plate to. admit the air and steam to the fire, whilst the plate is in position and supporting the fuel column while charging. The double water-cooled plates of the 500 b.h.p. size have no holes, the air and steam being drawn through the pre-determined space which intervenes when the plates are in position and supporting the fuel above. Another and more troublesome effect showed itself in the largest size (500 b.h.p.) with regard to the water- cooled plate, which was not experienced in the other sizes having the single water-cooled plate, the speed of the. double plate (38 in. per minute) being much too high when the plates are being withdrawn after charging, as it causes disturbance of the fuel: This creates a large quantity of dust, which the cooler has to remove from the gas, and at the same time the fuel bed becomes much too open. A larger area of fresh coal comes into contact with the incandescent fuel, and the hydrocarbons of the bituminous coal are liberated much too quickly. This not only tends to render the gas too rich, but should the temperature be at all low, the lighter hydro- carbons might escape through the fuel bod, and produce tar, or, otherwise, should the temperature be too high, a great quantity of soot would be present in the gas. To overcome this apparent defect, a suitable resist- ance is fitted in the main drum controller, which regu- lates the speed of the motor in such a way that the plates are withdrawn only at a reduced speed, allowing the three other operations, viz., the inward travel of the plate and the raising and lowering of the grate, to remain the same as in the other sizes. The following are representative analyses of samples of gas taken under varying conditions :— Table III. Carbon mon- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. oxide 10’9.. . 19’0.. . 18’0 . . 15’3.. .15’4 18’4.. . 23’2 Hydrogen 13’2.. . 10’7.. . 10’0.. . 10’2.. . 9’5.. . 11’4.. . 14’2 Methane 6'3.. . 4’8.. . 5’8.. . 6T.. . 5’4.. . 4’8.. . 2’3 Carbon dioxide 5’2.. . 4 8.. . 8’5.. . 7'3.. . 7’8.. . 7’4.. . 4’8 Oxygen 0'2.. . 0'0.. . 0’0.. . 0’0.. . 0’0.. . 0’4.. . 0’0 Nitrogen 64'2.. . 60’7.. . 57’7.. . 61’1.. . 61’9.. . 57’6.. . 55’5 Calculated 100 .. .100 .. .100 .. 100 .. .100 .. .100 .. .100 heat value*... 138'2.. .143-7.. .146’2.. .141’5.. .142’9.. .149’1.. 151’4 * In B.T.U. per cu. ft. (higher value). The percentage of hydrogen is lower than usually met with in gas from producers using anthracite coal, not- withstanding the fact that the supply of steam was increased above the normal. As much as 2*25 lb. of water were vaporised to 1 lb. of coal gasified at various times, as against the normal quantity of about 1*3 lb. per lb. of coal gasified. From 25 samples the average hydrogen content was only 10-29 per cent., but the average calorific value of the same 25 samples was 143’16 British thermal units per cubic foot higher value. As this producer is essentially of the high temperature type, a high percentage of hydrogen would be expected to be present in the gas, provided enough steam was supplied, but this does not appear to be the case. Undoubtedly a considerable quantity of steam is con- densed due to its coming into contact with the fresh fuel until this same fuel reaches an incandescent state, but samples taken immediately after charging and just before charging, and carefully analysed, show almost identical results in the composition of the constituents of the gases. The percentage of methane is very high, about four times the quantity usually met with in gas produced from anthracite or coke. This high percentage brings up the heating value of the gas which would be other-, wise very low, owing to the low hydrogen content. This relative proportion is very important in connection with the gas engine itself. If the hydrogen could be still farther decreased, still greater advantages would .be obtained. One of the most important advantages would be the compression of the gaseous mixture in the cylinder, which could be increased considerably with safety without increasing the risk of premature ignition, and this would result in a higher thermal efficiency of the engine being obtained. Only two samples out of 35 taken show any trace. of oxygen in the gas. This is accounted for by the density of the fuel bed which is being subjected to the con- tinual upward pressure of the rising grate. The only samples containing traces of oxygen were always obtained when the producer was newly started after a complete clean out, i.c., when the producer was working and producing gas from the coke charge prior to the first charge of bituminous coal. Various classes of bituminous coal are being gasified most successfully by this produce]-, caking and non- caking coals being found to be equally suitable. The upward pressure of the rising grate causing the fuel to become thoroughly homogeneous renders caking coal just as suitable as' the non-caking variety. Small coal has been found more suitable than large coal; but large coal could be easily broken as required. Coal containing a high percentage of ash curtails the period that the pro- ducer can work without a complete clean out. The approximate analysis of the coal used to produce the gas, as shown in Table III., is as follows :— Table IV.—Analyses of Dry Sample. Per c. Per c. Volatile matter, gas, tar, , etc... 33’22 Sulphur 0’59 — 33’81 Fixed carbon 60’05 Sulphur 1’09 Ash 5’05 66’19 Moisture 7 65 Specific gravity 1’304 Heat value per lb 13,790 Cost per ton delivered in works 13/3 (Lancashire) 1914. The most important feature of the producer is the entire absence of cleaning plant of any description, the only auxiliary chamber to the producer itself being the cooler, the general arrangement of which is shown in fig. 3. The chief function of this chamber is to cool the gas, which leaves the producer at a somewhat high temperature. Though the temperature of the gas before entering the cooler is high, it is absolutely free of any tarry matter, and when the gas leaves the cooler it is at atmospheric temperature and ready for use in the engine. In this cooler the soot, if present, is prevented from reaching the gas main leading to the engine. Gas enters the cooler at the base, the branch of which lias an expan- sion joint fitted to prevent any fracture occurring on the steam raiser pipe itself. The gas, after leaving the coke or the lower half of the chamber, comes into con- tact with a very fine gauze screen, which can be rotated from the outside by means of a chain and pulley. This screen prevents any soot leaving the chamber, as the jets of water play on to the upper surface of the gauze, 1 J; Fig. 3.—Sectional Elevation of Cooler. and drive the soot downwards into the coke immediately below. The coke itself has a separately controlled water supply. When the producer is started from cold, the gas is produced from coke only, and if this gas coke is not properly carbonised in the gas works, the gas may con- tain a trace of the lighter hydrocarbons, which will cause the fine mesh of the gauze screen to be slightly coated with tarry matter if the screen is in the hori- zontal position. To prevent this, the.screen is always put into the upright position, and brought into circuit as soon as the first charge of bituminous coal is fed into the producer. By the time this is done, the coke has become hot enough to have distilled off any tarry matter which may have been present in the first charge of coke. The introduction of a very fine gauze, having a mesh of 80 divisions to the sq.in., is unique for freeing pro- ducer gas from the various impurities met with; but should the gas contain the smallest percentage of tarry matter, this gauze would quickly become useless, and the stoppage of the gas flow would result. A screen of this kind is still working which has not been removed from the cooler for over a year, and the mesh is as clear as when first fitted. Referring now to the flexibility of this bituminous pro- ducer, bituminous coal again seems to play a very impor- tant part by rendering the fuel bed capable of meeting any sudden demand for an increased supply of gas when the engine is working on very intermittent loads. Anthracite is very difficult to ignite, and, likewise, very quickly loses its temperature when the supplv of air is curtailed. This is why a producer gasifying anthracite is unable to supplv a sufficient volume of gas quick enough to carry an increased load if suddenly applied. Bituminous coal, which is rich in volatile matter, is,' on the other hand, very ready to ignite, and also maintains its temperature much longer than anthra- cite, owing, no doubt, to the high percentage of oxygen, ranging from 8 to 15 per cent., while anthracite very seldom contains more than 3 per cent. This fact has a great bearing upon the flexibility question. Many experiments have been carried out on this bituminous producer to ascertain exactly how long the producer would be capable of retaining its temperature while the engine was running entirely free, and yet be high enough to produce gas in sufficient quantity and quality to enable the engine to carry full load. One of the smallest sizes, that is, of 100 b.h.p. capacity, has often been called upon to run absolutely free for an hour or more, and yet has developed full load in 70 seconds from the time of its application. A more useful, and at the same time, more con- vincing method of demonstrating the flexibility of the producer, and its adaptability to work on very inter- mittent loads, is the fact that a battery of these pro- ducers of 250 b.h.p. is now producing gas on the suction system from bituminous coal for driving gas engines of 850 b.h.p. This installation generates current for a series of very large cranes employed in the unloading of coal from ships moored alongside a large wharf. No extravagant claims are made with reference to the coal consumption per b.h.p. The actual consump- tion of 1-5 lb. per b.h.p., including all stand-by and starting losses, is recorded during an ordinary week’s work extending over several weeks on a fairly constant load, with a load factor of about 68 per cent. It is not possible to have clinker and ash containing a large amount of partially burnt fuel in this producer, as it is always run out entirely after the completed period of running. No charge of bituminous coal is ever introduced during the last 10 or 12 hours of the completed run. This procedure is entirely reversed when anthracite producers are shut down for cleaning purposes, it being always necessary to keep charging .the producer within one or two hours of closing down, and when the producer is cleaned out completely, it naturally follows that a large amount of unburnt fuel is withdrawn, from the producer, together with the clinker and ash, and it is nearly impossible to separate it. Though it is possible to obtain the extremely low fuel consumption of 0-8 lb. of anthracite per b.h.p. hour on a short forced trial, the fuel consumption distributed over a period of, say, three months must be much higher, due to the method of cleaning the plant, and also to the higher stand-by losses caused by the increased supply of air rendered necessary to retain the temperature of the fire for easy restarting after the producer has been standing idle for a time. Careful consumption tests with bituminous coal gasified in the producer show a net fuel consumption of 1'47 lb. per b.h.p., including all losses week in and week out. That is, igniting the fire on the Sunday after- noon and running for 12 hours a day for five days, and 74 on the Saturday. Russia’s Coal and Coke Imports.—According to the Custom House report, Petrograd, for the first nine months of the year 1915 the quantity of coal imported amounted to 4,354,000 poods, value 953,000 roubles. This compares with 271,595,000 poods, value 42,726,000 roubles, and 314,016,000 poods, value 50,637,000 roubles, in the corresponding periods of 1914 and 1913 respectively. The corresponding figures for coke were 163,000 poods, value 57,000 roubles, compared with 32.503,000 poods, value 6,128,000 roubles, and 42,757,000 poods, value 8,182,000 roubles, again for 1914 and 1913 respectively. The second of a series of lectures on “ Coal ” was delivered by Dr. Marie Stopes, D.Sc., Ph.D., at University College, on January 25. The lecturer dealt at some length with the interesting recent work of David White on the subject of the presence of lump-resin, which is frequent in tertiary and mesozoic coals, and is generally supposed to separate them from the carboniferous coals. This author records lump resin in several American coals of carboniferous age, and also resin threads in peculiarly preserved medullosean petioles. Some years ago, also, Mr. John Smith recorded amber-like lumps in a Scottish carboniferous coal. It is to be noted that in all these cases the coal is a low grade one. David White considers that in coals with 65 per cent, and more fixed carbon the resin has become too blackened and altered for recognition microscopically. The presence of plant debris of various kinds still recognisable in coal was then dealt with. The remarkable “ paper ” coal of Russia, which consists entirely of cuticles—chiefly of Bothrodendron—was described as an extreme case of the decomposition of all the plant substance except the most tenacious cuticles. The presence of wood tissue, bark, roots, leaves, and fructifications in the actual coal substance was described and illustrated both by lantern slides and the actual sections. Of these, some lantern slides of Dr. Hickling’s, and some microscopic sections cut by Prof. Jeffrey, of Harvard, were of particular interest as showing the tissue- cells filled wnth the same clear substance as forms the “ coal magma ” surrounding the cells. The full considera- tion of this significant fact was deferred till other data have been brought forward. “ Mother of coal ” was described, the lecturer pointing out how7 extremely bad and misleading this name is for the substance in question. Mother of coal is really the carbonised remains of W'ood, often in small chips or fragments like charcoal, but it is very unlikely to have ever been formed by ancient forest fires, as has often been supposed. It appears to be due to exposure to the Mr during accumulation, so that the tissue- wnalls were carbonised and the lumina left empty, instead of being permeated by the decomposing, semi-fluid mass of the true coal-forming magma. The next lecture will be on Tuesday, February 1, and will deal wuth bogheads, algal coals, etc. (Note : The course of lectures is open free to those interested in mining, etc.)