132 THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. January 21, 1916. ventilating splits 1, 4, 5, and 6; 4in. w.g. necessary to pass this quantity through the main intake and return alone. If for any reason the outerop fans at A X C have to be abandoned, and the total mine ventilation, 150,000 cu. ft., has to pass through the main intake and return, then the w.g. required to pass this. quantity through the main airways alone would be 9 in. The ventilating unit at the mine entrance would have to be increased in power by 2J times. Two 60 in. diameter open running fans of the Ventura type,'’placed at A and C could each pass 25,000 cu. ft. of air with -J- in. w.g. This w.g. would be ample for such a split in a 7 ft. seam. The horse-power ventilating the mine, as suggested on plan, would equal 66-97. The horse-power-in the air, passing the whole ventilation to a fan at mine entrance, would equal 212-92. The difference in favour of the outcrop fans = 145-75 horse-power in air. With a 60 per cent, efficient unit this would be equal to 243 indicated horse-power. Taking 2 lb. of coal per indicated horse-power per hour, this represents a saving of 2,128-6 tons of coal per year. It is thus evident that large economies can be effected by the use of auxiliary fans. FUEL VALUES* By Dr. J. H. Paterson. The financial value to 'the consumer of a fuel must be measured by the amount of heat which can be obtained from that fuel by the expenditure of a definite amount of money. This value is totally distinct from, and is not affected by, the quantity of the available heat which is utilised in any given process. In this paper, therefore, no cognisance is taken of the methods and appliances used to obtain the most efficient utilisation of the heat generated, but only the amounts of heat actually avail- able from the fuel used. In dealing with fuels of different classes, some diffi- culty has been met with in finding a common unit of value for their comparison, and it has been considered best, for the purposes of this paper, to make this unit the number of heat units (British thermal units) obtain- able for one penny, after all the costs of handling the fuel and causing it to burn have been added to the price per ton. This number will be referred to hereafter as the absolute heat value of the fuel in question. As the cost of fuels varies very considerably in different parts of the country, the comparison of their values is impossible unless the prices of all the different classes considered are those ruling in the same locality. For the purpose of this paper, therefore, the prices given are an average of those ruling in the north-east coast industrial centres. As the present cost of fuels is in all cases abnormally high, and in some cases (foundry coke and oil fuel) out of all proportion to the usual value, pre-war prices and values are shown in the most impor- tant cases, as well as the present prices and values. Coal. It is very generally recognised that the less money one pays for coal, the more incombustible matter (water and ash) it is liable to contain, but it is by no means so generally realised that the absolute heat value increases rapidly as the price decreases. The following table (Table I.), which is compiled from the average analyses of a few selected coals of types in common use, shows this clearly. In this table the calorific values shown are the net values, that is, the calorimeter value as determined on the dried coal, less the amount of heat carried away as latent heat during combustion, by the steam produced. The price of the coal as quoted includes the cost of delivery into the works, this cost averaging about 2s. per ton. Table I. Brice Net jncomb. B.T.U. a it v Class of coal. per cal. matter. forld A.H.V. ton. value, s. d. B.T.U. P.c. 1. Best screened loco. coal ............... 23 0...14,280... 5’6 ...115,000... 98,700 2. Screened steam coal 18 3...13,120...13’35...134,200...110,700 3. Screened steam coal 18 0...13,260...10’65...137,500...113,300 4. Smith’s small coal.. 18 6 13,600...10’32...137,000...115,500 5. Unscreened steam coal .............. 17 6...13,135...12’25,..140,000...114,400 6. Washed small coal 15 0...12,780...12’50...153,500...126,100 7. Heap coal............ 8 0...10,040...29’3 ...222,000...136,200 In fig. 1, the heat units per ton for a large number of coals have been plotted against the price per ton. As will be seen, the resulting curve shows remarkable regularity. It is evident from it that, for prices between 14s. 6d. and 18s. per ton, the heat value paid for falls away from the regular curve represented by the dotted line, or, in other words, if coals were sold on a regular calorific scale, instead of following the laws of supply and demand, we should expect to pay less than the present market value between these limits of price. The coals in this area of price include unscreened steam coals, washed slacks, and small nuts, all of which are among the most commonly used classes in large works. Fig. 2 shows a similar curve constructed at the end of 1913, and reproduced from an article by the author in The Shipbuilder (vol. x., No. 41). In this case, the falling off in value occurs between the prices 8s. 9d. and 11s. 9d. Tables II. and III. show how the absolute heat values of coals Nos. 2 and 7 in Table I. are arrived at. The figures given are those obtained when these coals are used to heat a frame-bending furnace, and are very similar for a hand-fired boiler. * Paper read before the Society of Chemical Industry, Newcastle Section. Table II. Coal No. 2. One ton of coal has net cal. value of 29,344,000 B.T.U. Pence. Coal at 18s. 3d........................ 219 Firing labour .......................... 36 Moving coals and clinker ................ 8 Repairs to grates ....................... 2 265 A.H.V. = 110,700. ’ Table III. . Coal No. 7. One ton of coal has net cal. value of 22,489,000 B.T.U. Pence. Coal at 8s............................. 96 Firing labour .......'................. 38 Moving coal and clinker ............... 20 Repairs to grates .................... 4-5 Steam for blowing ..................... 6-5 165-0 A.H.V. = 136,200. Coke. Coke of all classes requires a blast of air to keep it burning at a high temperature, so that in determining its absolute heat value, the cost of this blast must be included.. Foundry coke has recently reached so abnormal a price, that its heat value, as shown below, is misinforming. Its value in 1913, as-shown in Table VIII., gives a better idea as to its true relative position. Coke breeze (coke refuse from the gas works) is not always appreciated at its true value. This breeze, when screened through a screen of Jin. mesh, loses 40 per cent, by weight of fine dust, and leaves a residue of coke nuts, which is an excellent fuel for many purposes. Previous to the war, it paid to throw away the 40 per cent, of dust, but now that its price has risen, it becomes worth while to briquette it, . and mix the briquettes with the screened breeze, the cost of briquetting being about 5s. per ton of screenings, including labour and tar binder, and also interest on capital. Tables IV., V., and VI. show how the abso- lute heat values of the foundry coke, screened breeze, x o 30 23 2,9 26 3i 26 25 24 27 A Pio. 1. Pence per ton, 1915. 90 110 >30 ISO 170 I9O 210 230 250 270 and the mixture of screened breeze and briquettes are obtained. In Table V., the screenings from the breeze are assumed to be worthless, and thrown away. Table IV. Foundry coke. One ton of coke has net cal. value of 30,350,000 B.T.U. Pence. Coke at 32s.......................... 384 Firing labour ........................ 36 Moving coke and clinker .............. 9 Repairs to grates ................... 2-5 Blowing .............................. 3-5 A.H.V. = 70,000. 435-0 Table V. Coke breeze (screened). One ton of breeze has net cal. value of 29,120,000 B.T.U. Pence. Breeze at 10s........................ 120 Cost of screening .................... 13 Moving coal and clinker ............... 9 Firing labour ........................ 36 Repairs to grates ..................... 3 Blowing ............................... 4 185 A.H.V. = 157,400. Table VI. Coke breeze (briquetted). One ton of breeze has net cal. value of 29,120,000,B.T.U. Pence. One ton breeze at 6s................... 72 Briquetting 40 per cent................ 24 Firing labour ......................... 36 Moving coal and clinker ................ 9 Repairs to grates ...................... 3 Blowing ................................ 3 147 A.H.V. =200,000. Producer Gas. The absolute heat value of producer gas will depend mainly on the first cost of the coal and on the efficiency of the type of producer used. The results recorded below are obtained from a battery of water-sealed pro- ducers of the Duff type, each producer being capable of gasifying 10 tons of coal per 24 hours. The coal used in them is the small coal No. 6 in Table I. One cubic foot of the cold producer gas has a net calorific value of 170 British thermal units, and 65 cu. ft. of cold gas is produced per lb. of coal, or 145,000 cu. ft. per ton. One ton of coal, therefore, gives cold gas equivalent to 24,750,000 British thermal units. When, however, the gas is used hot, as from the above pro- ducer, the sensible heat of the gas raises this quantity to 27,000,000 British thermal units. As the original I 51 32 X 3o J o £ 291