66 THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. January 14, 1916. (3) The electric current is turned on, thereby burning out the combustible gas, and the valve is closed. (4) The instrument is shaken to facilitate cooling, whereupon the water in C falls to a point, on the scale,. indicating the percentage of combustible gas. A determination requires less than two minutes. If the detector were not shaken at the close of a test, thus forcing the water into the combustion space and cooling the gases quickly, cooling would be slow, and it would be a matter of five minutes or so before the gas in the combustion space would return to the original temperature of the gas before burning. This equalisation of temperature is necessary, because a difference in temperature causes the gas to expand or contract, and thus alters the level of the water in the glass gauge C. Hence the gas must be of the same temperature at the beginning and end of a test. The aluminium scale of the instrument is easily removable so that the proper graduated side, corre- sponding to the combustible gas ;hat is being detected, can be placed against the glass. Detecting Combustible Gases in Air. An instrument for detecting combustible gas in air is illustrated in fig. 3. It consists essentially of a U tube, one limb of which is formed by the part T S and P, and other limb by the part A B C Y and Y1. To make the instrument ready for use, the head piece X is unscrewed, and water is poured into the reservoir B, until the level of the water stands at 0 in one limb of the U tube, and at S in the other limb. To take a sample of gas for test, one blows into the tube T, thereby depressing the level of the water in that side of the U-tube to some point in P, and raising the level of the water in the other side of the U-tube to A., Next, the water is allowed to resume its former position, i.e., with level at S and C, thus drawing a sample of the air to be tested into the combustion chamber B. The valve A is then closed, and the little platinum wire (shown attached to the screw plug P) is heated by means of electrical energy derived from the dry cells D and E. The hot platinum wire burns the combustible gas in the sample, whereupon a contraction in volume of the sample takes place. The water consequently rises a certain distance in the combustion chamber B, and falls a corresponding distance in the glass tube K, i.e., falls a distance corresponding to the amount of com- bustible gas originally in the sample. A graduated scale is placed at M, alongside the glass tube K, and is marked in percentages of combustible gas, so that a direct reading is obtained of the percentage, by observ- ing the level to which the water falls opposite the scale. The scale is accurately calibrated beforehand, once and for all, by means of experiments made with known per- centages of gas. Four graduated percentage columns are placed on this scale, for the detection of different combustible gases. The two small dry cells that furnish the electric current are made by the Ever-Ready Company, of the National Carbon Company, and are stock articles. They provide energy enough for a minimum of 20 determina- tions. Each determination requires less than two minutes. The instrument is made of brass and aluminium, except for the stout glass gauge K. The weight is under 2 lb. When the dry cells are exhausted, they are taken out of the instrument by unscrewing the brass piece N, and new ones are inserted. A small spring is shown at 0 for holding the two dry cells tightly together and against the contact .F, which leads to the screw plug P, and thence to the platinum wire G. The two dry cells are placed in an insert in the brass tube Z. Water surrounds this brass tube, and is in com- munication with P through the place marked by an arrow. A small contact screw (not shown) is placed at the base of the instrument, for turning on the electric current through the platinum wire G. The instrument can be used for detecting different combustible gases, i.e., methane in mine air, gasoline vapour in air, hydrogen in air, coal gas in air, natural gas in air, acetylene gas in air, carbon monoxide in air or in flue gas, water gas or producer gas in air, and other combustible gases in air. Instead of water, one can use an aqueous solution of caustic soda, or caustic potash can be used in the device, thereby absorbing carbon dioxide as soon as formed, and accelerating the contraction in volume, with the net result that the instrument is more sensitive than if water alone were used in the device. After the combustible gas has been consumed, and the electric current has been turned off, the lowering of the water level in the glass gauge is not instantaneous unless the instrument be agitated, thereby shaking the water into the combustion space and cooling the burned gases. The point is that the gases in the combustion space must be of approximately the same temperature at the beginning and end of an experiment, or a true reading will not be obtained. In the United States, such patents as may be granted for the device belong to the Bureau of Mines, who am at present working out a method for exploiting the devices, so that the public interests will best be served. Abroad the patents are the property of the 'author. Imports of Pit Props in 1914.—The imports of pit props into the United Kingdom during the rear just closed aggre- gated 2,490,739 loads, the value being £4,786,301. The respective figures for the two preceding vears were 2,476,854 loads, valued at .£3.259,346, and 3,451,328 loads, valued at £4,445,066. During the month of December 140,192 loads were imported, valued at £461,632, as com- pared with 133,320 loads, valued at £224,592 in December 1914, and 228,528 loads, valued at £373,059, in December 1913, Notes on the Ignition of Explosive Gas Mixtures by Electric Sparks.* By J. D. MORGAN, A.M.I.E.E The ignition of an explosive gas mixture by a spark is commonly considered to depend upon the communica- tion of heat.from the spark to the gas. When approach- ing the subject, it is natural to suppose that the ability of the spark to ignite the gas can be expressed in terms of the heat energy of the spark. . On examining the subject experimentally, however, a suspicion is soon created that ignition depends partly, if not entirely, upon some cause other than heat. It is a common- place of ordinary experience that to produce ignition the temperature of the igniting means must not be below a certain definite value. This fact appears to have led to the belief that temperature is the deter- mining factor in ignition. It is wmll known, however, that if the temperature is not accompanied by a suffi- cient quantity of heat, ignition will not occur. Certain diminutive electric sparks will not ignite a highly inflammable gas, yet their temperature may be well above the ignition temperature. Glowing cordite emitting a spray of sparks “ cannot ignite a coal gas jet in spite of the obviously high temperature of the sparks.’’j- Assuming that heat alone, when accom- panied by sufficient temperature, is capable of causing ignition, it would apparently be right to suppose that the mode of producing electric sparks containing suffi- cient heat could have no effect upon the igniting pro- perty of such sparks. This, however, is not found to be the case. Prof. Thornton^ obtained curves for the least single sparks in continuous current and. alternating current circuits which will ignite a coal gas and air mixture, which curves showed that a greater amount of energy is required to produce an igniting spark by an alter- nating current than by a continuous current: and the relationship between the number of volts and amperes in the circuits immediately prior to the production of the sparks differs in character in the two cases. This fact is in itself sufficient to prompt the question : Does ignition depend upon some factor other than heat? A variety of experiments suggest a reply. If an iron wire heated by an electric current (continuous) be held over the disc of a charged electroscope, it will be found that when the wire first becomes visibly hot there is no effect upon the electroscope, and gas cannot be ignited. On gradually increasing the current, a condition of temperature is attained at which the electroscope steadily discharges. It is at this temperature that ignition occurs. In a paper by Prof. Thornton,§ a similar experiment with platinum wire is mentioned, and in the same paper there is recorded the most interesting and important result found by Mr. J. R. Thompson, that “ it is possible to ignite a cold explo- sive mixture by the incidence of X-rays on a platinum surface in it.” Another experiment consists in so adjusting the spark gap between a pair of pointed poles in the high-tension circuit of an induction coil that in neither air nor coal gas alone can a spark pass, but the poles emit a faint blue glow or brush discharge, visible in darkness. If the poles are contained in a small chamber, into which an explosive coal gas and air mixture is introduced, it is found that after an interval, which varies with the size of the gap, the gas explodes. The time can.be made to vary from a fraction of a second to as much as two minutes. If the gap is too large, no explosion can be produced. When the explosion flame appears, a spark at once passes, due to' the greater electric conductivity of the ionised gases, and often persists for a second or more after the flame has vanished. This experiment is somewhat at variance with one performed by Prof. Thornton. In another paper|| he states, in connection with a brush discharge from leaky steam pipes, that “ gaseous mixtures cannot.be fired by such a discharge, or by the more active discharge from needle points at extra high pressure, unless a definite spark passes.” As a matter of fact, the spark appears to be the conse- quence, and not the cause of combustion. Experiments such as those above described all suggest the ionic origin of ignition. It has been shown that where a hot wire or spark is the source, ignition only occurs when ionisation is produced, and ionisation alone without heat has been found to be capable of causing ignition. Dr. H. F. CowardU has expressed the opinion that “ the ignition of an inflammable gas mixture is largely governed by the two factors, namely (a) its thermal conductivity, and (b) the energy degraded when the dis- charge is passed.” He also stated, however, “ that the experiments (described in his paper) do not prove whether the ignition is ultimately a thermal or an elec- tronic effect.” Investigators of ignition phenomena are inevitably driven to suspect, if not to accept, the * From a paper read before the Institution of Eicetrieal Engineers, Birmingham. f H. F. Coward/C. Cooper, and C. H. Warburton. “ The Ignition of Electrclvtic Gas bv the Electric Discharge.” Transac'ions of the Chemical Society, vol. 101, n. 2278. 1912. J W. M. Thornton. “ The Ignition of Coal Gas and Methane bv Momentary Electric Arcs.” Transactions of the Institution of Mining Engineers, vol. 44. p. 145, 1912. § W, M. Thornton. “ The Electric Ignition of Gaseous Mixtures.” Proceedings of the Royal Scciotv. A, vol. 90, p. 272, 1914. (See Colliery Guardian, Julv 3, 1914, p. 19). || W. M. Thornton. ‘“The Limiting Conditions for the Safe Use of Electricity, in Coal Alining.” Report of the British Association, p. 513, 1914. UH. F. Coward, C. Cooper, and J. Jabobs. “ The Igni- tion of Some Gaseous Mixtures by Electric Discharge.” Transactions of the Chemical Society, vol. 105, p. 1069, 1914. ionic origin of ignition; and there is sufficient evidence as above indicated for stating that ionisation alone is capable of causing ignition, and ionisation accompanies the common electrical methods of ignition. In a general way it is well known that gas mixtures are only combustible when the proportions lie within certain limits. These limits, for methane and air, have been carefully worked out by Dr. Wheeler, and the least single igniting spark for mixtures between these limits have been investigated by both Wheeler and Thornton. Mixtures of methane and air containing less than 5-6 per cent., and more than 14-8 per cent., of methane are incapable of ignition.* * * § * Wheeler f has shown how the least continuous current t required to produce a single igniting spark varies with variations in the gas mixture. Single sparks were pro- duced between platinum points by a contact breaker arranged in a bell circuit, in which the voltage and induc- tance were kept constant. The most sensitive mix- tures were found to lie between 7-5 per cent, and 9 per cent, of methane. Using continuous current, Prof. Thornton found the curve to assume a different form from that already mentioned. The ordinates of the two curves are not comparable, since the least igniting current diminishes as the voltage or inductance increases. From the fact that a portion of the second curve followed closely a straight line which passes very nearly through the origin, Prof. Thornton argued that the igniting current is proportional to the number of molecules of com- bustible gas in unit volume of the mixture. Using alternating current, the character of the curve alters and assumes a symmetrical form, the current varying as the “ square of the excess of either of the combining gases on each side of the point of maximum inflammability. A . common method of defining the least spark which will ignite a given gas mixture is by specifying the number of volts and amperes, or the number of amperes and the inductance in the circuit prior to the formation of the spark. On the assumption that this gives a measure of the ability of a spark to ignite a gas (or the “ incendivity ” of the spark), the validity of the method has been rightly questioned. For both inductive and non-inductive circuits there seems to be no sufficient reason, as will be explained later, for the assumption ior- 5 o Current o-4 ampere approximately throughout io Seconds Fig. 1. that the energy associated with a circuit prior to spark- ing can be regarded as a measure of the incendivity of the spark. Nevertheless, there is a practical value in curves showing the relationship between the number of volts and amperes or amperes and inductance in circuits, which, when broken, give rise to sparks capable of igniting a given gas mixture, for they indicate conveni- ently the practical conditions under which dangerous sparking becomes possible. The foregoing researches showed how, at a fixed voltage (90 volts), the least current capable of producing an igniting spark in an 8 per cent, mixture of methane and air varies with the inductance of the circuit, and that, in an inductive circuit at relatively low voltages, the current varies but little over a wide range of voltage variation (see figs. 1 and 3). The amounts of voltage and current, or current and inductance, capable of pro- ducing dangerous sparking are comparatively small; hence the necessity, already well known, of adequately safeguarding electrical apparatus to which explosive gases are accessible. In experiments with single sparks, when a given spark was of the intensity just below that required for ignition, it was reproduced a number of times, and if ignition was never obtained, the spark was regarded as ineffective in the particular gas employed.. It must be borne in mind, however, that the repeated sparkings which were found by the experimenters to be incapable of igniting the gas, wore produced at a comparatively slow rfite by rotating one of the poles by hand or a small motor; and unless this fact be noted, the above assumption is liable to be misleading. The author finds that a single spark, which when repeated slowly will not ignite a gas, will after a more or less definite interval produce ignition when repeated rapidly. The element of time seems to him to be a factor of importance .in ignition phenomena. If instead of.a single break device a vibratory make-and- * M. J. Burgess and R. V. Wheeler. “The Limits of Inflammability of Mixtures of Methane and Air.” Transactions of the?Chemical Society, vol. 105, p; 2591, 1914. 1 R. V. Wheeler: Home Office Report on Battery-Bell Signalling Systems. 1915. (See Colliery Guardian, April 23, 1915, p. 855).