322 THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. August 13, 1915. own. We have not the number of railway companies’ wagons that we had under normal conditions. I do not think the sidings as a rule are so congested in Warwickshire now as they were a month ago, but still they are congested, and we are still feeling it. In answer to the question ; “ On what principle do the collieries fix pit head prices for coal not under contract? ” witness said : We use ordinary business methods there, and we are actuated by ordinary business principles. We have no association for the fixing of any price. And both in London and elsewhere we deal through agents and the local market. The best coals of Warwickshire do not come to London; they are t’aken elsewhere. Our best coal has a very excellent market in the country districts, in the South Midlands, right away down to Exeter, and under normal conditions we have a market there for our coal, which is much better than the London market, and we keep it there even under extraordinary conditions such as are existing now. In London you do not get the same fixed demand for a particular article. It is rather useful as a dumping ground, and when there is a good supply of coal above the demand London gets its coal at any price it likes almost in a good many periods. Warwickshire coal is not a bitumin- ous coal, and London likes that, as a rule, for house coal. In the western and south-western district they would not look at a bituminous coal at all. In witness’s opinion, the worst period was over. The spring would make a very great difference, and if it had not been for the reduction of output that had been caused by the loss of men who had gone to join the Colours, he felt that the price of coal would have been pretty considerably less this winter than last winter. Of course, the railway congestion made all the difference in the world. He added : Especially, as far as Warwickshire is concerned, the demand for manu- facturing coal in the Midlands to-day is keener than it has been for a great number of years. The demand undoubt- edly is in excess of the supply. A good deal of this 40 per cent, of free coal is going forward to the manufacturing dis- tricts, but there are a good many fairly good contracts for London. The smaller coal comes very much to London; it is used for electric lighting purposes and for manufacturipg purposes generally. We suffer a good deal not only from the fact that a number of men have joined the Colours, but like- wise because of the absentees. We have a great deal of it in Warwickshire. I know it is very prevalent in most mining districts. ,We have an “ absence ” list of something over 10 per cent, in our collieries in Warwickshire. Now, if you take 2 or 3 per cent, of that 10 per cent, as being due to accidents or illness, you have 7 per cent, of the men left behind who could work, but are not working full time or anything like full time. That is our ordinary rate of absenteeism. I am not suggesting that it has gone up, but what I want to point out to you is this, that notwithstanding all our appeals to them that owing to the crisis we have, and with 25 per cent, of our men gone to the front, we cannot get this particular class of man to attend to his work any more than he did before the war. We should have been able to get more coal out, and we should have been able to keep our places in better order for the purpose of getting coal out, if we had not had this absenteeism. In one or two cases I have known the collieries have had to play a day or a day and a-half a week. That might be so, but the output of the day has not been maintained owing to the shortage of men to keep the turn going. We are suffering largely now from the shortage of men, and we have not sufficient men to keep our collieries in that condition which is necessary for the maximum output when working. I do not think it is true to say that the interruption of work owing to the absence of trucks would tend to have a rather demoralising effect upon the men. With a considerable number of men, you cannot get them to work more than a certain number of days a week. It has occa- sionally happened that men have come to work expecting to be able to work, and they have even gone down the pit, and have had to go home. We should not knock them all off in a case like that; we should keep a certain proportion to do dead work about the roads and faces, and we should bring them out at the usual time. That has happened at a good many collieries when you depend upon railway trucks keep- ing you going. Fixing Prices. Witness said some coal that would normally be household coal had been diverted for manufacturing purposes. There was great competition in the Midland district for large steam coal, which under ordinary circumstances would be a lower priced coal, and they had paid a jjauch higher price in order to have a supply of coal to keep their works going. The coal that had supplemented the steam coal would possibly be used for household purposes. In one case especially, he knew where works had been shut down for a couple of days; that was in connection with work for the War Office. They would have taken any sort of coal, house coal, or anything else, to keep the place going. As regards the mechanism of fixing prices, witness said : Erom what I know of the London market, when prices are going up, colliery proprietors are very well aware what the merchants are doing, and the collieries and the London market, I Should fancy, work fairly simultaneously. We do not let the agents fix our prices. We fix the prices for them, subject to their advice. Of course, they are in close touch with the merchants in London, and the conditions of trade in the district in which they are selling, and we keep ourselves in close communication with them, and frequently see them. In Warwickshire the agent as a rule is a paid servant of the colliery company, and does not as a rule sell for. anybody else. We keep in touch with him, and we decide the prices that shall rule, that shall form our list, according to our own judgment formed by the advice that we generally get from our agent from first knowledge of the market which he has got to sell in. In some cases he is paid a salary and commission, and in other cases he is paid on commission alone so much per cent, on his selling price. r In some cases it is so much per ton irrespective of the selling price. We have a good centre of distribution in Birming- ham, Leamington, Cheltenham, Gloucester, and lots of towns in the West. I should say that not more than 30 to 40 per cent, of our output of all kinds comes to London. It is not a considerable part of the London consumption. The fact that competition in one district is not so keen as in another might very materially affect the price that a colliery gets for its coal in a particular district. For instance, take a place like Birmingham, where there is fairly keen competition under ordinary circumstances, you would not be able to get the same price for some coals there that you get for the same coal at other places at the pit. For instance, we send coal on to towns in the West that we should never dream of send- ing to Birmingham, because we can get a better price at the other place than we get at Birmingham for it. The cost of freightage does not touch it very much, only so far as this is concerned. Our railway rate to London is 5s. 3d. .a ton from Nuneaton, which you may call the distributing centre for Warwickshire, on the London and North-Western; and there is Is. per ton for the wagon, which makes it 6s. 3d. It may be that if the railway freightage is low the colliery price is high, and that if the railway freight is high the colliery price is low; so that where the railway rates are low, the colliery gains the increased profit and not the consumers. It just depends how many people are competing for that parti- cular coal. For instance, if you had a 5s. rate to a certain place, and there was no other colliery with a similar class of coal that could get there for less than 6s., naturally the posi- tion of Warwickshire would be that much better. Speaking generally, the prices at the pit head have little or no relation to the cost of production, because there are times when the cost of production is very close to the average price at which you are selling your coal, and there have been times not very far away when the price we could get for our coal was not equal to the cost of production. There was no constant between the average selling price and the average cost of production. It is not altogether true that in the more modern well-equipped pits there is a larger margin of profit between cost and selling price than in the older fashioned ones, because a good deal depends upon the natural conditions fisting in the mine, and likewise in the quality of the coal that mine is producing. I have in my mind a colliery excellently equipped that has never paid a farthing yet. The natural conditions of a colliefy vary so very greatly even in the same district, and it even does not become a question of management. If a man is getting coal under very dis- advantageous circumstances, he cannot get a single farthing more for it than a colliery more favourably situated. The demand for coal as a rule fixes the market price you can get. It does not matter how disadvantageous the position is, it does not affect the price you can get for the coal. Any argument or discussion as to the cost of production and increased expenses may be interesting, but it does not affect the result at all. Witness said they had no specific name for the coal which was sent to London. It was classified under different names at different collieries. There was a classification which was called screened cobbles, and the size of that coal ran from 4 in. cube up to 6 or 8 in. cube. Then there was a class below that, a nut coal, which ran about 3 in. cube. Then there was a class—bakers’ nuts—even below that, which was very largely used by bakers in London. There was a good trade for Warwickshire coal as a rule amongst bakers in London. It was a free burning coal, and there was an absence of sulphur in the coal which made it a desirable and useful coal for bakers to use. In connection with costs, witness said the increased cost of production varied very considerably. The minimum increased cost at. any colliery could not be less than Is. per ton, including everything. As to the profit that was being made, they must not lose sight of the fact that there was a small amount of free coal. The average selling price—witness was speaking now for his own colliery—was only from 10 to 12J per cent, more than it was in February 1914. As justifying their interpretation of the clause in their contracts, witness pointed out that he had sold coal to works and a breakdown had taken place; during the time of the breakdown the supply of coal had been discontinued, and he had not claimed against that man. He added : You might contract to a considerable extent with a certain quantity of coal, which it is not remunerative to stock at all, and if you had all your eggs in one basket, or a good proportion of them, you might find yourself with unremunerative coal on your hands; but, nevertheless, you cannot contract without such terms. I have contracted with a large cement works for coal, and there has been a stoppage at the works for two or three weeks, and during that period the people have not taken the coal, and they have claimed exemption under the terms of the contract. The provision as regards cancellation is a mutual arrangement. The customer can cancel it if he likes. The colliery can cancel it if it likes. If a man has bought coal at a price which is higher than the current rate, and for some reason the works have been stopped and the customer has not been able to take the coal, the quantity is reduced for the time being, or it is proportionately reduced. When the contract finishes by effluxion of time at the end of the period, if the man makes a demand for the coal, and if it suits us to deliver it, we may deliver it, and if he tells us not to deliver, the contract is at an end. If the price is mutually agreeable at the time the contract finishes, of course, we should deliver it. As a rule a man does not repudiate a contract because the price has gone against him. There must be exceptional reasons, like a strike, or some- thing equal to it. Witness said they had had wagons away as much as 70 davs between the time of going out and coming back again. Taking the collieries as a rule in Warwickshire, thev have something like 50 per cent, of the carrying capacity in their own wagons; the other half is carried in the railway companies’ wagons and likewise private traders’ wagons. Witness said that as a rule they would not be in a position to supply contractors beyond the 80 per cent, out of their free coal, because they kept a certain percentage of their coal for the open market for customers who did not contract. They had a good many in the country, comparatively small merchants, and as a rule they did not contract for their coal. They were regular customers, both summer and winter, and the colliery reserved for them the quantity of coal they would take. Traffic Questions. On the subject of wagons, witness further said : When there is a good demand for coal, such as there is at the present time, a customer gets his wagon at his depot, and he is not very long in unloading, even if he puts it on the ground and lets it go. We have not the same control at the destination as the customer has over his wagons. We are not getting nearly as many railway companies’ trucks now as we did under normal conditions. I would be rather inclined to say that, taking merchants’ wagons as a rule, they are doing quite as well, or even better, under present conditions than under normal conditions, because they do not need to keep them loaded at their destination when ^they get them there. I do not say it happens in every case, and I will not say it happens in the London depots. We do not suffer so much in the country as in London. Tn fact, it is getting so acute on the South-Western Bailway, that I will not agree to send my wagons unless thev will pay so much a week for them. From 30 to 40 days is not an unusual period now in a large proportion of wagons, especially if they have to go south of London. In no case are we restricting the contracts to less than 80 per cent, of the total. Un to the end of February, my contracts were practically delivered. There were just one or two cases where thev had suffered owing to the railway company not taking the coal. I find that the whole of my neighbours had faithfully delivered their contracts up to the end of February, less the 20 per cent. Woolwich is about the worst place we can possibly send our wagons to. My trucks are now doing about as near as possible one-half their duty and nothing more. We have a large number of customers who have trucks of their own, and they are now sending rather more trucks than usual. Two-thirds of the trucks that come into the colliery sidings are now customers’ trucks. The country merchants’ trucks are working better now than under normal conditions, because there is no detention at the destination. Under normal conditions, a small country merchant will have two or three trucks of various qualities standing for several days. At the present time he does not need to do it. Mr. Phillips said the cost per ton of coal for timber at normal times varied very considerably. The price of timber was up .anything from 60 to 80 per cent. The average cost for timber was anything from 4d. to 6d. per ton. He had been connected with collieries where the cost was Is. per ton, but that was a big cost. The wages per ton, owing to reduced' output, made a very material difference. If they reduced their output 20 per cent., they soon found that their cost per ton for post wood and other materials and wages had gone up in proportion, apart from any increase in prices, and these had been considerable. The cost of iron and steel had gone up, and they used a good deal of steel for supports now. So far there had been no rise in wages in the pits. At the close of his evidence, the chairman quoted from a letter of affirm of Leicestershire colliery owners informing a firm of London coal merchants that they had got to cut down their supply to 240 tons a month, instead of 300 tons, at a contract price of 9s. 9d.. These gentlemen had the con- sideration to say a month later ; “ Referring to your contract with us, we beg to advise you that our prices for excess supplies over 240 tons a month until further notice will be as follows : main cobbles, 20s. per ton; main nuts, 20s. per ton.” Witness said that was not an uncommon practice or an uncommon case. There were merchants who con- tracted for a certain quantity every year. In some cases they sold that quantity to their customers, who perhaps might be a works, or an institution, or something of that sort. In other cases, and a good many of them, too, a man contracted for, say, 200 tons per month of a certain quality of coal for 12 months., He knew what his average require- ments were for that particular depot or depots he was going to supply. He did not contract for the whole amount that he required, but he contracted for one-half or three-quarters of what he required, and he would depend on the market for the remainder. (To be concluded.) Notice is given in the London Gazette that at the expira- tion of three months the under-mentioned companies will be struck off the register and dissolved :—Automatic Centrifugal Pump Limited; Barnsley and Central Coal Agency Limited; Cymric Rhondda Colliery Company Limited; Dovecote Moor Colliery Company Limited; East Kent Electric Supply Company Limited; Gaudron Limited; Irish Mines Limited; Rabble Chain Colliery Company Limited; Treibel {E>moke Combustion Company Limited; United Sherardizing Company Limited; Wern Collieries Limited; Western Canada Coke and By-products Company Limited; Wolf Engineering Company Limited. Coal, Supplies and Prices. — How to secure adequate adequate supplies of coal for home consumption, and how to ensure that reasonable prices shall be charged to the domestic consumer by the coal merchants, were the subjects of a con- ference on Wednesday, between the Government Exports of Coal Committee and representatives of the South Wales coal owners. Mr. Russell Rea, M.P., chairman of the Com- mittee, presided. Among the members of the Committee present were Sir Richard Redmayne, Sir Douglas Owen, and a representative of the Admiralty. The questions of coal supplies and prices have been considerably affected by the passing of the Act limiting prices, and also by the regulations of the Government necessitating the obtaining of licences before coal can be exported. To meet and deal with the situation created a representative committee of the South Wales coal owners drafted proposals which, after receiving the approval of the coal owners generally, were submitted to the Exports Committee for their consideration and approval. The scheme suggested has also been forwarded to Sir T. Ratcliffe Ellis, secretary of the Mining Association of Great Britain, and to the secretaries of the coal owners’ associations throughout the country, with a view to action on similar lines. The proceedings were private, but the main pointe of the scheme considered were :—To ensure to home consumers adequate supplies of coal’ for their requirements; to ensure the fair distribution of the burden created by the Price of Coal (Limitation) Act; to assist collieries which will suffer as a result of the Act to obtain redress provided by sub- section 2 of section 1 of the Act; to advise the colliery owners and to assist them in negotiations with the Govern- ment in relation to any difficulty which may arise in the working of the Act; to adjust any differences arising from the Act, whether between individual collieries or between the collieries and the home consumers. (2) Particulars as to quantities of all contracts for coal intended for consumption in the United Kingdom made prior to and uncompleted on August 1, 1915, such particulars to include the description of the coal, the period during which and the rate at -which delivery is to be made and the quantity undelivered on August 1. The collieries may at any time refuse to supply to any consumer or works more coal than in the opinion of the committee is necessary for the carrying on of such works, or the current requirements of such customer. The collieries may refuse to supply any applicant with coal intended for consumption outside Monmouthshire and South Wales, unless such applicant has prior to the war been obtaining supplies from collieries within the district of the committee. The committee may from time to time enter into agreement with local authorities, coal merchants, or hauliers in their area fixing the price at which various descriptions of coal shall be delivered to houses for domestic use, and in all cases the prices so agreed shall be advertised or otherwise made public within such area. The committee shall endeavour as far as practicable to arrange that the. respective collieries shall supply coal for use in the United Kingdom in approximately the same quantities as they were supplying coal for similar purposes at the date of the Act. The cases of new collieries shall be dealt with by the committee on their respective merits. The Exports Com- mittee are understood to have received the scheme in a friendly fashion, although, of course, they were not in a position to signify general approval of it at the present time. It is expected that the views of the coal owners in other parts of the country will be considered before any action is taken to draft an official scheme.