1122 THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN November 27, 1914 that the most effectual method is to place the dust on cross-shelves, and on overhead timbering, if there be such ; then the advance air wave causes the entire dust load to fall in a shower and practically all of it is brought into play, whereas when placed along the ribs and floor it is not so easily brought into suspension when the explosion pressures are low. With this cross-shelf arrangement, which is practically a continuous Taffanel barrier, the greater specific gravity of the limestone dust has no appreciable disadvantage since, after tests, it is found widely scattered, and on the other hand there is some liberation of carbon dioxide, which further tends to quench the combustion. In connection with the extinguishment of the flame of an explosion, it is interesting to note that in an effort to start a strong ignit.on of coal dust 75 lb. of coal dust was placed on eight cross-shelves from immediately in in front of the cannon to 50 ft. distant. To the surprise of all present at the test, the flame did not pass beyond these cross-shelves. The test was repeated five times in all, with the same results except in one case when propagation occurred. Subsequently M. Watteyne of Belgium reported he had tried the same experiment, and obtained confirmatory results. Coal dust placed in There are two forms of these: One the box barrier, where six boxes containing about 700 lb. of dust are hung from the roof and timbers across the entry. In the final design (figs. 3 and 4) the arrangement com- prises a light open box hung by four freely suspended rods, with eyes, from open hooks fastened in the roof or overhead timbering. The box within limits may swing freely; when, however, the movement is over fin. Or thereabouts from the middle position, the two suspending rods on the side toward which the movement is directed, which fasten to the bottom edge of the box, are struck by cleats fastened to the upper edge of the box, and if the movement is sustained by the advance wave of the explosion, the eyes of the suspending rods are pushed off the open hooks and the box swings downward, pivoting on the points of suspension of the rods on the opposite side of the box. The rock dust in the box is partly discharged, but some is held by the bottom of the box, which is constructed of two loose boards resting on clea ts attached to the side of the box. The boards are hung by chains attached to the roof or overhead timbers, which permit the boards to drop 3 or 4 inches, then they are caught by the chains so that a portion of the rock dust is held on them, unless the explosion is so figs. 5 and 6, is termed the “ concentrated barrier.” In this the rock dust is placed on a large platform hung close to the roof. The platform consists of boards, hinged separately to a cross timber, and held up at the other end by an angle iron. This angle iron, in turn, is held up by a system of levers, which are tripped by vanes. There are advance vanes connected by a wire with the lever which pushes upon the tripping lever. In the experiments at Bruceton the advance vane has been placed about 100 ft. from the concentrated barrier. As erected in a commercial mine there would be a similar vane on the other side, as the barrier is symmet- rical, and will extinguish an explosion approaching from either side. In case of possible accidental tripping, and danger when a man or trip of cars is passing, the inner end of each of the platform boards is ( fastened by a loose chain to the roof, or to a cross timber, permitting only a limited drop. As hitherto arranged, half of the boards dropped about 9 in., and the other half about 18 in. The platform holds about 3 to 4 tons of rock dust, and is quite compact, occupying the space between timber sets, which are placed 7 ft. apart. In mines with low roof it may be necessary to brush down the top to make room. The appearance of Fig. 4.—Box Rock-dust Barbier. Fig. 5.—Concentrated Barrier, showing Undee-side of same, and Bumping Vane in Front; also Tripping Wiee from First Vane, 100 ft. in Advance. I Fig. 7.—Rock-dust Protected Door with Front Bjiard Removed to Show Loose Chains to Support Boards Over Door Frame if Explosion Occurs. Fig. 6 — Concentkated Barrier after Light Explosion, which ■ it Extinguished. this way appeared to have acted like a rock-dust barrier; the coal dust falling rapidly across the path of the flame cooled it below the ignition point of the dust. It must be clearly understood, however, that an excess of coal dust is not a protection even in an ignition under any ordinary circumstances, as it is almost impossible to conceive of its being similarly placed under working conditions. It was interesting to note that in each case there was much burning dust found on the platform in front of the cannon alter the test. Rock Dust Barriers. At the experimental mine the barriers, which in com- pliment to Mr. Taffanel are termed “ Taffanel barriers,” were employed to limit the zone of violence. The barriers proved uniformly successful in stopping explo- sions, except in a few instances of very light explosions or other inflammations where the flame passed the barrier. There is also the disadvantage that where the air current was strong, as it generally is along the haulage ways of American mines, the dust was blown from the shelves. Again, in mines where the watering system is employed, the dust will likely become dampened, and when wet it is, of course, ineffectual in quenching explosions. These disadvantages led Mr. Rice to design some special forms of enclosed barriers which would operate with lighter pressures than the Taffanel open barriers violent that all parts of the box are ruptured. In the latter event the rock dust is automatically launched and mixed with the air and coal dust cloud. The arrangement of hanging the bottom boards, which allows some of the retained dust to sift down slowly, is to take care of the more difficult situation brought about in light explosions, when there may be a con- siderable time interval between the advance air wave and rhe flame. It has the further merit that if a box is accidentally tripped off, the bulk of the weight is caught by the chains, and it is not believed a serious injury would be caused to a man who might be caught underneath. To protect the rock dust, in an ordinary mine working, from becoming damp or admixed with float coal dust, the box should be covered by a waterproof cloth attached over the centre line of the box to the roof, so that as the box dumps the cloth is automatically pulled from its top. As indicated above, there is less difficulty in stopping a violent explosion than a light one, because in the violent explosion the whole mass is disrupted, and the rock dust forms a thick cloud of inert dust. Many tests have shown that the rock dust from the boxes is very widely distributed, and when limestone dust is used it can be observed ejected from the mouth of the mine by the air blast. Another form of barrier, which is illustrated by the barrier in passing under it is like that of an ordinary overcast. The leverage system of operating the concentrated barriers can be arranged so that it will operate with almost any desired pressure. As arranged at the experimental mine, it will not discharge until the pressure is equivalent to that of a wind of about 40 miles per hour (3,500ft. per minute)—in other words, a heavy gale. It is thought that the proper places for such concentrated barriers are at intervals in the main entries, and in each side entry near its mouth, so that if the mine is panelled an explosion will be confined to one panel. It is interesting to note that Mr. Taffanel had indepen- dently decided that it was desirable to have such enclosed barriers, and had designed a concentrated barrier just prior to his coming to Pittsburg recently for collabora- tion on special tests. This was also tried out success- fully at the experimental mine, but it did not have the advance vane for tripping it, and this Mr. Taffanel thought was a considerable gain to provide for very rapid explosions. As far as the tests have gone, the box barriers and the concentrated barriers are equally effectual, and the adoption of one or the other at the commercial mines wjll perhaps depend somewhat on local conditions. The success of the foregoing barriers led to the designing of a rock-dust protected ventilating door,