October 30, 1914. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. 925 TRADE AND THE WAR. Aniline Dye Manufacture in the Doncaster Coalfield—Code Cablegrams—Coaling the German Cruisers—A Disputed Cargo—Trading with the Enemy—Industrial Alcohol —The United States Coal Trade. We last week referred to the fact that Doncaster was felt to be a likely place for a factory for the manufacture of aniline dyes. Our correspondent has since been informed that a company is to be organised with this object in view. It is pointed out that the best situation for such a factory would undoubtedly be in a district from which a plentiful supply of tar, from which the dyes are made, could be obtained, and that Doncaster, with its ring of collieries, would be eminently suitable, if it were possible to carbonise sufficient coal to obtain an adequate supply of tar. The objects of the new company will be the home production of oil, motor spirit (petrol), and smokeless fuel. Coal from practically every colliery in the South Yorks district has been carbonised with satisfactory results. It is reported that works capable of dealing with l.,000 tons of coal per week are to be erected, and that the company propose to take over and to erect machinery and plant at a cost of between =£25,000 and <£30,000. The Postmaster-General announces that the Army Council, who control the arrangements for the censorship of submarine cablegrams throughout the Empire, have relaxed as from November 1 the prohibition against the use of codes, subject to certain regulations : The use of code will only be permitted in telegrams passing between the United Kingdom on the one hand and British possessions and allied or neutral countries outside the European telegraph system on the other. The use of code is at present prohibited by the following extra European Administrations : Argentina Republic, Brazil, Danish possessions, Dutch East Indies, French possessions, Italian possessions, and Angola (Portuguese). Only four specified Codes will be allowed. With regard to the circumstances in which the steamer “Lowther Range,” bound with coal from Newcastle, New South Wales, to Guaymas, Mexico, has arrived at Esqui- malt, British Columbia, the owners of the vessel state that she was stopped in the Pacific by a British cruiser which, after replenishing her bunkers from the “ Lowther Range's ” cargo, ordered the vessel to proceed to Esquimalt, where the remainder of her coal would be at the disposal of the Admiralty, if required. There would, therefore, appear to be nothing in the circumstances to bear out a previous suggestion, that the “Lowther Range” was stopped on suspicion of carrying coals intended for German cruisers. The Gibraltar Chronicle reports the capture by a British cruiser of the Hamburg-Amerika liner “Graecian,” with 4,000 tons of coal on board, apparently for the use of the German warships in the Atlantic. The “ Grsecian ” has been taken into Gibraltar. It is stated that the Cardiff-owned steamer “Exford,^ captured and detained by the German cruiser “Emden,’’ left Cardiff during the latter part of September with a cargo of best Welsh steam coal under an Admiralty charter for the Far East. She carried approximately 7,000 tons. The fact that she' had not been sunk with the other captured British vessels seems to indicate that the “Emden” had detained her in order to replenish her own bunkers from the “ Exford’s ” precious cargo and possibly also to use her as a store ship till the latter’s supplies run out. A British captain, whose ship has just arrived from Mexico, throws an interesting light on the manner in which the wandering German cruisers renew their supplies of coal. “While I was at Vera Cruz,” says the captain, “I noticed six colliers laden to the bulwarks with coal. Presently a wireless message arrived, giving simply a latitude and longitude. Instantly the six colliers put to sea, making for the point indicated. The message was to let them know that the cruiser or cruisers were waiting to replenish their supply of fuel. The colliers flew the Norwegian flag.” The Advisory Committee of Newcastle Chamber of Commerce states that there is no reason to believe that any part of the increased shipments of coal to Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Holland in September was sent to Germany. It is reported that the coal situation in Austria is becoming alarming. The wholesale dealers’ reserve stocks are entirely depleted, and are scarcely able to meet the demands of customers from day to day. Ninety-five per cent, of household coal comes from Upper Silesia. Large stocks are there, but there are no railway wagons to transport them. All efforts to obtain coal from Western Bohemia and Moravia have failed. Mine owners have already sold their output in advance, and refuse to make new contracts. The municipality of Vienna had planned to create a reserve stock of 30,000 tons, but is unable to collect a single thousand, and has been compelled to abandon the attempt. The coal shortage will be severely felt when really cold weather begins. Sir Samuel Evans, in the Prize Court on Monday, heard the application by the Crown for the condemnation of the proceeds of the sale of 1,210 tons of coal seized on board the “Aidworth,” of Sunderland, at Cardiff Docks. Mr. Bevan, for the Crown, said that the coal was sold by Messrs. George Insole and Company, of Cardiff,- to the Austrian Lloyd Steamship Company, but had not been paid for when it was seized on August 21. After seizure the coal was sold by order of the Court. Mr. Ballock, for Messrs. G. Insole and Company, claimed the proceeds. He explained that, although the coal was sold to the Austrian Lloyd Company, it had never been paid for ; in fact, events had shown that his clients were still the owners. The coal was shipped in July, and as soon as the war broke out Messrs. Insole gave notice to the ship owners that they had a lien on the coal as sellers who had not been paid, and they entered into a contract with another firm, Messrs. Proxey and Company, to sell it to them, receiving the sanction of the Procurator-General. In those circumstances they were the owners of the coal when it was seized. His lordship said the cargo was properly seized, and the Crown was entitled to the proceeds. He made an order accordingly. Writing to the Morning Post, Mr. Leslie Scott, K.C., asks; “What L the justification for the general licence to trade with the enemy so long as you do it through a branch ? ” Commercial credit, he adds, is the mother of war loans, and commercial credit is international in operation. It is like water that finds its own level. If German merchants have no cash in Germany, but have money to their credit at ‘branches' all over the world, it is as good as cash in Germany. So it does not matter whether the money is paid to the German merchants in Germany or not; it will serve German purposes almost as well if it stays in England to the credit of their agents in England or France or America. A public prohibition of direct trading is almost a superfluity. The interruption of oversea commerce has put a practical stop to most of it. Therefore, if you expressly authorise indirect trading you undermine the whole of our national attack on the financial resources of Germany.” Mr. Scott’s and our own remedy is that all enemy trading should be forbidden, as it is by our law. Germans in British, allied or neutral territory should not be treated as friends, unless, at any rate, they have a perfectly separate commercial establishment quite uncon- nected with any house in Germany; and he doubts whether even so they ought to be treated on the same footing as our own subjects, though that is our English law. The provision about “ branches ” should be completely rescinded. Then when, on the merits of any particular case, permission is sought to trade, an individual licence can be granted by the Board of Trade on the merits of that case. The principle should be not general permission—as it is—but general prohibition subject to particular exception by special licence. In the trades compulsorily insured against unemployment the percentage of unemployment at October 23 was 4*31, as compared with 4’50 in the previous week, and 5’41 a month ago. As regards the uninsured trades, the number of men and women on the registers of the labour exchanges at October 23 are practically the same as the figures for the previous week, being 61,525, as compared with 60,402. The Egyptian Government is taking steps to remove from the Suez Canal all enemy ships which have been long enough in the Canal ports to show clearly that they have no intention of departing in the ordinary way. A Lloyd’s message from Rio de Janeiro states that the Hamburg-South American Company's steamer “ Santa Catharina ” is reported to have sunk at Abrolhos through bunker fire. It is understood that the “ Santa Catharina ” was sheltering at Abrolhos (an island off the Brazilian coast), and the point is therefore raised whether she was lost owing to an ordinary peril or whether she was lost as the consequence of the war. The risk of bunker fires in the large number of German liners which have been sheltering for weeks in neutral ports is a serious one. A telegram from Berlin says that the Reichsgesetzblatt has published an order extending the prohibition of pay- ments to England and the British Dominions to France and the French Colonies. . During the first half of the present month, according to the Black Diamond, the loading of cargoes for export had not progressed so rapidly as was the case in September, when a total of 624,933 tons was shipped from the three Atlantic ports, Hampton Roads, Baltimore and Philadelphia, and the tonnage shipped for the month will not be any- where as large as the September exports. Hampton Roads exports for last month, reaching 432,865 tons, was an increase of 239,956 tons over September 1913. Baltimore exported in September 133,613 tons and Philadelphia 58,455 tons. Baltimore showed very substantial increase. There is some enquiry in the market for export coals, some of these enquiries having to do with contracts for a 12 months period. Quotations on Pocahontas and New River at Hampton Roads run from 2*85 dols. to 2 90 dols., but it is evident that due to the very heavy supply of these coals, these prices may be shaded 5 c. per ton where a shipper has more coal at the piers than he has steamers engaged for. A statement of the distribution of the coal exported in September, from the ports above named, is as follows :— Country. Tonnage. Italy ............. 157,224 Cuba ............. 95,772 Argentine ........ 52,604 Greece ........... 48,167 Brazil ........... 41,602 Mexico ........... 21,607 Panama............ 22,166 Egypt ............ 20,917 Norway ........... 14,165 Curacao .......... 14,008 Jamaica .......... 12,463 Trinidad ......... 12,045 Sweden............ 11,625 Barbados........... 8,944 Philippines....... 7,006 Sicily............. 6,747 Gibraltar......... 6,000 Country. Tonnage- French West Africa 5,162 Chile ........... 6,011 Spain............ 5,161 French West Indies 5,025 St. Thomas....... 4,545 Uruguay ......... 4,929 Costa Rico ...... 4,191 Porto Rico ...... 4,329 Honduras......... 3,500 Liberia.......... 3,036 Congo............ 3,742 Guatamala ....... 2,322 Demerara......... 1,988 Newfoundland .... 1,833 Canada........... 2,100 Colombia......... 1,200 By direction of Sir Edward Grey, Sir Cecil Spring Rice, the British Ambassador, has addressed two notes to the State Department at Washington. In regard to mineral oils and other articles listed as contraband, the notes state that Great Britain will seize no cargoes if the ships' papers show the destination to be a neutral one, and only where goods are consigned to order will Great Britain exercise scrutiny. At the same time, warning is conveyed to American shippers to consign to neutral Governments or to some other specific consignee. One of the notes calls attention to the marked increase in the export of American mineral oils in the last few weeks. Evidence in possession of Great Britain, the note continues, shows that a large proportion of the oil exported to neutral ports has been transmitted thence to belligerent countries. Arrangements are, however, now being made according to which articles capable of use for war purposes shall not be re-exported from neutral countries. The French Cabinet Council have signed a Decree dealing with commercial drafts which have fallen due, and with the withdrawal of money on deposit or on current account at the banks. The effect of the Decree is to partially abolish the moratorium in France. It is reported that an alliance between Liverpool and New York shipowners has been formed for the capture of Germany's carrying trade, especially with South America, by means of a large fleet of cargo steamers flying the American flag. The company is to be managed by a joint board of directors with offices in Liverpool and New York, and will start with a nucleus of at least 20 ships, ranging from 6,000 to 11,000 tons. The intention is to operate the new freight service from New York to Australia, India, China, and South American ports. The Russian Commission for the Purchase of Supplies informs manufacturers, merchants and shippers executing orders for the Russian Government, that application for permission to export to Russia any articles for the use of. that Government, the export of which from the United Kingdom is prohibited, should be made, through the Commission, 192, Cromwell-road, S.W. Manufacturers, merchants and shippers, in asking the Russian Coxnniission, to obtain permission to export, must state:—(1) Nature and quantity of goods to be exported; (2) name and address of consignor; (3) name and address of consignee; (4) port and date of shipment; (5) ship or line by which, shipment is to be made; (6) port of discharge ; (7) marks on passages, if any. The Board of Trade, replying to the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce regarding the proposed arbitration court on questions arising out of contracts made before the war, state that, in view of the great and apparently insuperable difficulties of statutory intervention, every effort should be made to dispose of outstanding questions by arrangement. The Foreign Office has issued a circular to shippers and others dealing with the question of ships and cargoes in enemy ports. The circular says it is not possible in present circumstances to render assistance to British subjects who possess interests in such vessels or their cargoes. Article 2 of The Hague Convention of 1907 relative to the status of enemy merchant ships at the outbreak of hostilities pro- vides :—“ A merchant ship which, owing to circumstances beyond its control, may have been unable to leave the enemy port within the period contemplated in the preceding article, or which was not allowed to leave, may not be confiscated.” The belligerent may possibly detain it on condition of restoring it after the war without payment of compensation, or he may requisition it on condition of paying compensation. Article 4 (1) of the same Convention provides that “ enemy cargo on board these vessels is like- wise liable to be detained and restored after the war without payment of compensation, or to be requisitioned on payment of compensation with or without the ship.” This Convention was signed and ratified by Germany. A supplement to. the London Gazette contains two pro- clamations, one furnishing revised schedules of absolute and conditional contraband, and the other setting out certain further modifications in the Declaration of London. Amongst articles now made absolute contraband are : Powder and explosives specially prepared for use in war; sulphuric acid; armour plates; haematite iron ore and haematite pig iron; iron pyrites; nickel ore and nickel; ferro-chrome and chrome ore; copper, unwrought; aluminium; ferro-silica; barbed wire, and implements for fixing and cutting the same; mineral oils and motor spirit, except lubricating oils. The following, inter alia, are made conditional contraband :— Railway materials, both fixed and rolling stock, and materials for telegraphs, wireless telegraphs, and telephones ; fuel, other than mineral oils; lubricants; powder and explo- sives not specially prepared for use in .war; sulphur; glycerine. The second proclamation re-enacts the Order in Council dated August 20 last, adopting the Declaration of London, with certain modifications. Further amendments are now made in order to minimise, as far as possible, the inter- ference with innocent and neutral trade occasioned by the war. Subject to the exclusion of lists of contraband and non-contraband, it is provided that a neutral vessel, with papers indicating a neutral destination, which, notwithstand- ing the destination shown on the papers, proceeds to an enemy port, shall be liable to capture and condemnation if she is encountered before the end of her next voyage. The destination shall be presumed to exist if the goods are consigned to or for an agent of the enemy State. Condi- tional contraband shall be liable to capture on board a vessel bound for a neutral port if the goods are consigned “ to order,” or if the ship’s papers do not show who is the consignee of the goods, or if they show a consignee of'the goods in territory belonging to or occupied by the enemy, and in such cases it shall lie upon the owners of the goods to prove that their destination was innocent. Where it is shown to the satisfaction of one of his Majesty’s principal Secretaries of State that the enemy Government is drawing supplies for its armed forces from or through a neutral country, he may direct that in respect of ships bound for a port in that country, Article 35 of the Declaration shall not apply. So long as such direction is in force, a vessel which is carrying conditional contraband to a port in that country shall not be immune from capture. It was provided in Article 35 that conditional contraband was not liable to capture, except when found on board a vessel bound for territory belonging to or occupied by the enemy or for the armed forces of the enemy, and when it was not to be dis- charged in an intervening neutral port. The ship’s papers were stated to be conclusive proof both as to the voyage on which the vessel was engaged, and as to the port of dis- charge of the goods, unless she was found clearly out of the course indicated by her papers and unable to give adequate reasons to justify such deviation. The French State Railways announce that the necessary measures are being taken to ensure the transport of coal from Rouen to Paris, in accordance with the conditions necessitated by the military authorities. The regulations imposed do not allow, in a general way, the acceptation on this line of more than one wagon per day and per ship- ment, but this regulation is subject to derogations, especially when complete train loads can be formed. It is understood, however, that the number of trains run will not exceed the number of daily trains allowed by the military authorities. The Kolnische Zeitung of September 23 reports that the coal production of the Rhenish-estphalian Coal Syndicate only amounted to 4,623.000 metric tons in August 1914, as compared with 8,855,000 metric tons in July, and 8,670,000 metric tons in August 1913. This output in August only amounted to about one-third of the authorised output. The output of coke amounted to only 1,390,022 metric tons in August 1914, as compared with 1,787,077 metric tons during the corresponding month of last year. The production of briquettes, on the other hand. ros*e to 401,389 metric tons, a^ compared with 390,402 metric tons during August 1913. H.M. Consul at Amsterdam reports that an agent in Amsterdam, who states that he could sell large quantities of gas and steam coal for use in the Netherlands, wishes to get into touch with United Kingdom exporters. The United Kingdom manufacturers of the articles mentioned may obtain the names and addresses of the enquirers on appli- cation to the Commercial Intelligence Branch of the Board of Trade, 73, Basinghall-street, London, E.C.