May 16, 1913. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN 1021 Scotland since the year 1880, both in percentages and money value.—Mr. Buxton said the increase in the general rates of miners’ wages since 1880 on the old standard of 1879 had been 62J per cent, in West Scotland, 29 per cent, in the Lothians, and 42 per cent, in Fife and Clackmannan. The base rates for these three districts differed up to 1888, since which year all districts had increased their percentage above the new standard of 1888 by 81J per cent. He regretted that there were no statistics enabling him to compare the actual earnings of miners in 1880 and 1913. The Nationalisation of Mines. A special sub-committee of the executive of the Miners’ Federation of Great Britain resumed at the Victoria Hotel, Southport, on the 8th, the consideration of the Labour Party’s proposed amendments to the Bill forbringing about the nationalisation of the mines, which the executive prepared after a draft had been approved by the conference of the Federation at Swansea in October last. When the final form of the Bill has been approved, it will be submitted to the Government for the adoption as one of their measures. Failing their acceptance, the Labour Party will endeavour to bring it before the House. When the Bill was drafted the miners placed it before the Labour Party with a view to its being introduced into the House of Commons. Since then it has been the subject of negotiation, several suggested amend- ments put forward by tthe Labour Party being now under the consideration of the Miners’ Federation. The sub-committee finished the task of examining the amendments proposed by the Labour Party, and they will report in due course to the miners’ executive. In all probability further negotiations with the Labour Party will then take place. OBITUARY. The death has occurred at Tangiers of Mr. C. Buckingham Pope, the chairman of the Denaby and Cadeby Main Collieries Company Limited, and one of the most prominent commercial men in Yorkshire. Mr. Pope left England recently on a voyage for the benefit of his health. Mr. Pope was a justice of the peace, and at one time was an unsuccessful Parliamentary candidate for one of the Hull divisions. This was in 1880, when he was a barrister on the north-eastern circuit. Col. George Pearson, of Grenville House, Ashton, whose business interests centred in the coal trade, and who had been for many years the principal of the Spinners’ Coal Co. Limited, Stalybridge, died last week. The deceased, who was 61 years of age, was well known throughout the coal trade in the north of England, and, following service as a member of the committee and as a vice-president, he was in 1904 elected president of the Manchester Coal Exchange. He had suffered from a form of diabetes, and, notwith- standing skilled attention, he became gradually worse, and passed away at the residence of his mother at Gloucester. The death occurred at Llandilo on the 1st inst. of Mr. Percival Robert Augustus Willoughby, M.I.C.E., Director of Public Works, Jamaica. Mr. ^Willoughby was born in 1868, and on .leaving college he was articled to Mr. H. O. Fisher, engineer of the Taff Vale Railway, and was after- wards appointed executive engineer of the Dooars Company in Bengal, assistant engineer to the city engineer of Cardiff, deputy-engineer of Merthyr Corporation, civil engineer to the Dowlais Iron Company—afterwards Guest, Keen and Nettlefolds—and engineer and architect to the Pontypridd Municipal Council. Mr. Willoughby was appointed Director of Public Works in Jamaica on December 24, 1908. The death occurred on the 9th inst. of Mr. Benjamin Whitehouse, Wood Bank, Sandyfields, Sedgley, who for over half-a-century was intimately associated with the iron and coal trades of South Staffordshire. Mr. White- house was a son of the late Mr. Henry Bickerton White- house, proprietor of the Priorfields Furnaces, Deepfields. The son joined his father in the business, which was eventually converted into a limited liability company under the style of H. B. Whitehouse and Son Limited. The business, like other similar industries in the Black Country, passed through many vicissitudes, and a few years ago the whole of the works were dismantled. Mr. Whitehouse took an active part in the establishment of the South Stafford- shire Mines Drainage Commission, of which he was a member up to the time of his death. He was the only one named in the Mines Drainage Act of 1873 who still retained an active association with the Commission. He was until about two years ago a regular attender at the meetings of the Commission. He was appointed a county magistrate as far back as 1862. For forty years he was chairman of the Sedgley Bench, and on the death of Sir Alfred Hickman he became chairman of the Bilston division. He had a numerous family of sons and daughters, some of whom predeceased him. He was over eighty years of age, and is survived by his wife. An appeal has been issued by the English Forestry Association to growers and users, pleading for the more extensive employment of home-grown timber. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION. (Specially Contributed.) Leaving Work to Get Drink. Elliot v. United Alkali Company Limited.—In this case (Ayr, March 6) it appeared that pursuer and a fellow-workman admitted in evidence that they had left the works during their shift on the night of October 5, 1912, by going through a broken part of the fence that surrounds the works, and had visited two public-houses and had drink in both of them. It was on the way back from this visit that the accident happened. The Sheriff found that the pursuer had failed to prove that the accident arose out of and in the course of his employment as a furnaceman under the defenders. He further found that the pursuer was guilty of serious and wilful misconduct in respect of his having left his work to obtain liquor and returned drunk and unfit to perform his duties, and was in that state when the accident happened. Notice of Accident. Cairns v. Carlton Main Colliery Company.—It appears to be more and more difficult for employers to escape liability on the ground of want of notice of accident; but where the employer is clearly prejudiced the court will endeavour to protect them. In this case (Barnsley, March 7). it appeared that the applicant commenced working at the Grimethorpe Colliery in July 1912. He was working along with his mate in the night shift on September 2 doing “ ripping ” work when he was injured. He continued to work the shift and did not report the accident, thinking the injury was only slight. He went to work in the following shift, and the injury hurt him so much that he reported the accident to the timekeeper. The company paid him compensation to November 19, but refused to pay any further compensation, stating that information had been brought to them that the accident did not take place at the colliery. The company further alleged that notice of the accident was not given to them as requested by the Act. His Honour found that the accident took place at the colliery, and that the company shad received notice of the accident. He awarded the applicant 14s. 3d. per week compensation during incapacity and costs. This case may be contrasted with Magog v. Morris (Sunderland, February 21), where it appeared that while at work in respondent’s foundry in June 1910 a piece of iron struck the applicant in the right eye, as the result of which he subsequently lost the sight of that eye. Magog at the time reported the accident to the foreman, and received at the office of the works a ticket for the eye infirmary. Except for a few days at intervals, he continued to work until October 1912, when he was advised by the doctors at the infirmary to cease work. His Honour said that while it was clear that verbal notice had been given, written notice had not been given as the law required, and he further held that by the claim being so late after the accident the employers had been prejudiced. It was only right that provision should be made to protect the employer of labour. He therefore gave judgment for the respondents. Fell Dead through Running for Assistance. In a case at Hartlepool (March 8), it appeared that the husband of the applicant fell dead from the exertion and excitement of running for assistance for another man to whom an accident had occurred in the pit. After hearing the evidence and arguments, his Honour said there was no doubt in his mind that, in going for assistance, the applicant’s husband was “ acting in the course of his employment.” It was not necessary to prove that there was any breakage of the man’s body; it was sufficient if it were shown that the accident produced a physiological effect. Onus of Proof. Dyehouse v. Great Western Railway Company.—It appears to be the practice, in some county courts, to apply rule “ When in doubt, find for the workman, and leave the employers to go the Court of Appeal.” The following case is a striking example of this (Swansea, February 18):—It appeared that deceased, an engine driver, got down from his engine. Soon afterwards a signal to proceed was given, and in his absence the stoker started the engine. On pulling up, he went to search for the deceased, and found that he had been killed on the line. The question was whether deceased was in the performance of his duty when he got off the engine, or whether he got off for his own purposes. The judge said that the explanation offered by either side was unsatisfactory, and he himself was unable to decide the point. The question was—on whom did the onus of proof rest ? He quoted a decision of Lord Justice Fletcher Moulton, and, following that, held that the onus of proof was on the respondent. He therefore found in favour of the applicant for £300, but granted stay of execution for a fortnight to enable the respondents to consider whether they will appeal, saying he would not be surprised if the case were taken to the House of Lords. Conflicting Claim by Illegitimate Children and Parents of Deceased. Tarbrook v. Denaby and Cadeby Collieries.—In this case (Doncaster, March 10) the question was whether a man’s mother, to whom he made occasional payments,.. or his illegitimate children were to be regarded as dependent upon him. It appeared that two childrenr aged three months and two years respectively, were the illegitimate children of John William Tarbrook, who was killed while engaged in rescue work on July 9 last. At the end of December the colliery company paid into court £218 17s. 9d., and they now disclaimed any interest in the arbitration. In February this year the woman died after she had appointed her mother guardian for the two children. The man’s father and mother claimed to be partial dependents on the deceased man. Deceased’s mother said she was paid £22 by the Denaby Permanent Relief Fund and got £6 from the union. His Honour gave judgment for the applicants, and accepted Mrs. Ast ill, of Parkwood Springs, mother of the deceased woman, as guardian, allowing £10 for immediate expenses and 4s. per week for the children. *#* We shall be pleased to answer in this column questions relating to Workmen’s Compensation and Employers’ Liability. All communications must be authenticated by the name and address of the sender, whether for publication or not. No notice can be taken of anonymous communications. Midland Miners’ Relief Society.—In the absence of both the chairman and vice-chairman, Mr. W. S. Martin* was elected to preside over the annual meeting of the Midland District Miners’ Fatal Accident Relief Society, which was held at the Midland Hotel, Derby, recently. The annual report showed that at the end of 1912 there were 43,441 members, which was an increase of 752. There had been 36 deaths from accidents, making a total of 899, for which provision had been made since the foundation of the society in 1883. The balance in the bank at the present time was £1,995 18s. lOd. Mr. R. Todhunter, in his actuarial report,, stated that at the end of December the benefit fund amounted to £77,276. The valuation showed a surplus of £22,663 over all liabilities as compared with £13,798 at the last valuation. Commenting upon the report, the chairman suggested that as their funds were so satisfactory they might increase the age limit of children who were in receipt of benefit and add something to the benefits of single members. Several speakers agreed with this view, and the question of increased benefits will be considered at the next special general meeting. Tunnelling the Humber. — The members of the Yorkshire Geological Society spent their Whitsuntide excursion on the western edge of the East Yorkshire wolds. A matter of much interest was a borehole which is being put down for coal in the neighbour- hood of Market Weighton, but no information was forthcoming as to the results. On Saturday evening a discussion took place on the geological conditions affecting the proposed scheme for tunnelling under the Humber, Prof. Kendall, who presided, said he had for many years advocated a tunnel under the Humber. Unless Hull desired to be side-tracked they must agitate for better communication with London and with the great coalfield of South Yorkshire. But a tunnel, unless very wisely placed, might be detrimental to Hull. If the tunnel gave preferential advantages to Hull’s rivals on the Humber the scheme might be disastrous to the Yorkshire port Mr. J. W. Strather, in opening the discussion, said the geological conditions were such that engineers with modern equipment could make a tunnel on any line across the Humber that commercial men desired. He considered the proposed line east of Hull between Pauli and Goxhill commercially disastrous for Hull, and the geological conditions would be most difficult. A line west of Brough through the chalk and olite would be easiest and best. Mr. G. W. B. MacTurk thought the eastern line would present no insuperable difficulty. The chalk west of Brough was much shaken and might be difficult, and there was a danger of tampering with the Hull water supply. Mr. Cosmo Johns, of Sheffield, said he thought a line 5 or even 10 miles west of Hull would not affect the value to Hull of a line connecting Yorkshire with the great improved coalfield. Prof. Kendall pointed out that the line of the pre-glacial Humber was not identical with the existing river. He had made some time since, from data derived from well borings, a pre-glacial map of Holderness and found a chalk floor over the whole area covered by the low part of Holderness. The question was difficult as to the depth of the channel of the old Humber below this floor. To drive a tunnel through the glacial deposits, which were very variable and might carry much water, would be a precarious business, and the chalk west of Brough presented difficulties by reason of the enormous quantities of water it held. He believed the best line would be west of Brough and that the tunnel should go down to the great clays, the Kimmeridge and Oxford clays. Here tunnelling would be safe and easy, and notwith- standing the greater depth, would be cheaper than in the- more risky depths.