August 23, 1918. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. 391 Sir Douglas Haig also wrote :— The question of an adequate supply of coal for all our needs is almost a vital one for the Allied cause at the present time. Another message was read from M. Clemenceau, who telegraphed:— There must be no hesitation, no weakness, and no relaxing of effort; but always more and more. The address was listened to with great attention by the miners’ representatives, and at the close many questions were put. In reply, Sir Guy said repre- sentations were being made for the miners to get increased food. He was not in a position himself to say that no more miners would be taken for the Army, but a deficit of 27 million tons seemed to answer that question. The delegates intimated a desire to help the Coal Controller as far as possible. It was alleged by two speakers that certain colliery owners were deliberately reducing the output of coal from their collieries by closing down the working of the thicker measures from which coal is more easily and rapidly won, and employing the workmen upon produc- tion in the thin seams, which involves more work and from which the output is considerably smaller. In the case of the miners released from the Army to resume work in the pits, Mr. J. Robertson contended that the majority of these released men are, as a result of their military service, below the ordinary level of physical fitness, and consequently unable to produce an average man’s output of coal. This meant that, paid as miners are on tonnage, their earnings will fall below the average, and working with other men in a “place ” they will lower the average earnings of the party. The suggestion was made that in these cases, until such time as the men have won back the full measure of their physical power, they should be paid the average wage of the coal hewer independent of what may be their earnings on tonnage rates. The Conference spent the greater part of Wednesday in discussing the executive’s proposals as to the duties and remuneration of the new permanent officials of the Federation, and the procedure for the conduct of the ballot. It was agreed to have a central office in London, the two permanent officials to reside in the vicinity. It was further resolved that the president and secretary be full-time officials at a salary of £600 per annum, with an allowance of £75 for house rent, together with allowances for rates, lighting and fuel. In the event of either official becoming a member of Parliament or a paid official of the Government, he must relinquish his position with the Federation. The words “ or a paid official of the Government” were added on the motion of the South Wales Federation. The election is to be by ballot vote of the members of the Federation, the principle of the alternative vote to be applied. The nominations from districts for the two offices are to be sent in to Mr. Thomas Ashton on or before September 30, and the nominations are limited to one candidate for each office by any district of the Federation. Mr. Smillie has been nominated by the Scottish Mine Workers for the office of permanent president. There are already several nominations for the office of secretary. Mr. J. Robson is the nominee of the Durham Miners’ Association, and Mr. G. H. Warne the nominee of the Northumberland Miners’ Association. There were three candidates for Lan- cashire, and the choice fell upon Mr. P. Pemberton, the financial secretary of the Lancashire and Cheshire Miners’ Federation, who was for 11 years the assistant to Mr. Thomas Ashton, the present secretary of the Miners’ Federation of Great Britain. The conference yesterday (Thursday) discussed the output of coal. An official statement which was issued regarding their deliberations mentioned that one of the principal points affecting the question was better food of sustaining quality. The miners do not ask for a bigger share of food than others; but the quality of the food they are now receiving considerably affects their efficiency as coal producers. The conference asked for more reasonable treatment of the men by colliery officials, so as to keep down friction as much as possible. Better facilities for getting coal from the coal-places to the surface were asked for. The necessity was urged of pit committees being established, and it was suggested that greater powers from the Coal Controller would enable them to inquire into the question of manage- ment as it affects the output, as well as into the productivity of workmen. Another point referred to the visit of the Coal Controller’s experts to make enquiries into complaints by workmen &s to the laxity on the part of the management in getting coal out of the working places. These experts, when visiting, should interview the workmen’s representatives as well as the colliery managers; otherwise they would never be able to prove any case against the management. It was pointed out that since the last war-wage was given, at the end of June, the shares of nearly all the principal collieries had considerably advanced, and what was true of the colliery shares was also true of the shares of nearly all other large industries. It was felt that the Government ought to deal very drastically with this exploitation by capitalists, in- cluding coalowners, if they wished to secure a more satisfactory state of things amongst the workers and better responsibility from them. The following resolution was carried:—“That this conference calls upon all districts to exercise to the full the functions of the pit committees upon the lines suggested by the Federation executive; that mass meetings be held in each district, at which the executive will urge the men to make every effort to increase the output.” It is understood that the Government have decided on the immediate appointment of a practical coal expert, whose task it will be to devote all his energies to increas- ing the coal output of the country. COAL PRODUCTION IN BRITISH COLUMBIA DURING 1917. The annual report of the Minister of Mines for British Columbia gives the gross production of coal in 1917 as 2,398,715 long tons (2,240 lb.), of which 248,740 tons were made into coke, leaving the net pro- duction at 2,149,975 tons. These figures show a de- crease, as compared with 1916, of 86,865 tons gross, ~~ .... ... of of but an increase of 65,882 tons net. The coke made was 159,905 tons, which is a 107,820 tons as compared with 1916. For comparison the following table is given. 1916. Tons. 2,485,580 401,487 quantity decrease purposes Coal, gross Less made into coke 1917. Tons. 2,398,715 248,740 2,084,093 267,725 2,149,975 159,905 Vancouver Island mines Nicola and Similkameen mines Crows’ nest mines Coal, net Coke made ... Summarising the provincial production of coal, the following table shows the output: — 1916. Tons. 1,492,761 110,549 882,270 1917. Tons. 1,695,721 151,243 551,751 Total quantity of coal mined Less made into coke 2,485,580 401,487 2,398,715 248,740 2,084,093 2,149,975 the net coal than it was Net quantity of coal produced As will be seen from the above figures, production in 1917 was 65,882 tons more in 1916, and greater than it had been since 1912. This output would have been considerably greater had not the Crow’s Nest Collieries met with a series of misfortunes during the year that interfered with production, and in addition to this there was a serious shortage of labour—partly caused by the heavy en- listment of the younger men—and in the early part of the year there were labour troubles. All these contributed to occasion a shortage of both coal and coke, when the demand was most keen. The production of coke in 1917 was 159,905 tons (2,240 lb.), which is 107,820 tons less than the pre- ceding year. Of this gross coke production, 129,499 tons were made by the Crow’s Nest Pass Coal Company in East Kootenay, and the remaining 30,406 tons by the Canadian Collieries at Comox, V.I. The greater part of the gross provincial production is still being mined by three companies—the Crow’s Nest Pass Coal Company of East Kootenay, the Canadian Collieries, and the Western Fuel Company of Vancouver Island, which mined, collectively, 79-5 per cent, of the gross output, their respective pro- duction representing 18-8 per cent., 33-2 per cent., and 27-5 per cent, of such total. Of the other collieries, in the Coast District, on Vancouver Island, the Pacific Coast Coal Mines Limited produced 150,538 tons, the British Columbia Coal Mining Company 61,586 tons, and the Nanoose Collieries Limited 27,822 tons; and in the Nicola Valley section of the district the Middlesboro Colliery Company mined 83,458 tons, the Inland Coal and Coke Company 7,296 tons, the Princeton Coal and Land Company 46,926 tons, and the Pacific Coast Colliery Company some 206 tons of coal. In the East Kootenay District, in addition to the Crow’s Nest Pass Coal Company, which produced 450,686 tons, the Corbin Coal and Coke Company pro- duced 101,065 tons. In addition to those companies actually shipping, several other companies have been installing plant and have approached the shipping stage. The collieries of the Coast District, including the Nicola-Princeton fields, accounted for about 77 per cent, of the total coal output. The gross amount of coal distributed was 2,401,520 tons, 2,805 tons of coal being taken from stock. Of this gross amount there were sold for consumption in Canada, 935,469 tons; for consumption in the United States, 754,568 tons, and in other countries 38,211 tons, making the total coal sales for the year 1,728,248 tons. In addition to the coal sold there was used in the manufacture of coke 248,740 tons, and used under companies’ boilers, etc., 198,102 tons, while 226,430 tons were lost in washing and screening. The coke sales of the province amounted to 160,522 tons, of which 734 tons were taken from stock. The following table indicates the markets in which the coal and coke output of the province was sold : — Coast Crowds Nest Total for Coal sold for— District. Pass district. Province. Tons. Consumption in Canada ... 861,672 . Export to United States ... 528,721 . Export to other countries ... 38,211 . Total coal sales ... Coke sold for— Consumption in Canada .. Export to United States ... Export to other countries... Total coke sales ... 31,559 ... 128,963 ... Collieries of Coast District. The collieries of the Coast District, which include those on Vancouver Island and in the Nicola-Princeton fields, mined 1,846,964 tons of coal in 1917, while 2,811 tons were taken from stock, making 1,849,775 tons distributed from these collieries in 1917. This amount was distributed as follows: Sold as coal in Canada, 861,672 tons; sold as coal in United States, 528,721 tons; sold as coal in other countries, 38,211 tons; used under companies’ boilers, etc., 140,452 tons; used in making coke, 54,289 tons; lost in washing, etc., 226,430 tons. The total coal sales showed, as compared with the sales of the previous year, an increase of 188,779 tons, equivalent to over 15 per cent. The coal sold in British Columbia by the collieries of the Coast District showed an increase of 78,939 tons, Tons. 935,469 754,568 38,211 Tons. 73,797 225,847 ...1,428,604 ... 299,644 ... 1,728,248 31,559 ... 116,252 ... — ... 12,711 ... 147,811 12,711 160,522 or about 10 per cent, from the preceding year; the amount exported to the United States was 77,795 tons greater, and 38,211 tons of coal were exported to other countries. Only one company in the Coast District — the Canadian Collieries Limited—has ever made coke. In 1916 the ovens were again put in operation after several years of inactivity, and in 1917 this company produced 30,406 tons (2,240 lb.) of coke, 117 tons were burned under the company’s boilers, and 1,270 tons were taken from stock, making the total sales for the year 31,559 tons. On Vancouver Island five companies produced coal during the year—the Canadian Collieries Limited, the Western Fuel Company, the Pacific Coast Coal Mines, the British Columbia Coal Mining Company, and the Nanoose Collieries Limited. The majority of these companies each operate two or more collieries. The combined gross output of the island collieries was 1,695,721 tons. In the Nicola and Princeton coal fields of the Coast District, the Middlesboro Colliery Company produced 83,458 tons of coal; the Princeton Colliery 46,926 tons; the Inland Coal and Coke Syndicate (formerly Coal Hill Syndicate), 7,296 tons; the Pacific Coast Colliery Company, 206 tons; and the Merritt Collieries Limited, 13,357 tons. The total output of this portion of the sub-district was 151,243 tons. East Kootenay Coal Field. There were only two companies operating in this district—the Crow’s Nest Pass Coal Comp any, operating two separate collieries, the combined output of which was 450,686 tons, and the Corbin Coal and Coke Com- pany, which made an output of 101,065 tons, making a gross output for the district for 1917 of 551,751 tons of coal. The Hosmer Mines Limited did not operate. In addition to the coal mined, six tons was added to stock, making the amount of coal distributed from the collieries 551,745 tons. Of this gross tonnage 194,451 tons were used in the manufacture of coke, of which there were produced 129,499 tons. The coke sold amounted to 128,963 tons, and 536 tons were added to stock. The following figures show the distribution made of the coal of this district: Sold as coal in Canada, 73,797 tons; sold as coal in United States, 225,847 tons; used by the companies in making coke, 194,451 tons; used by the companies under boilers, etc., 57,650 tons. The value of coal produced in 1917 shows an increase of 230,588 dols. as compared with the previous year, but the coke production shows the large decrease of 646,920 dols. The coal production in the Coast District was considerably greater than in 1916, but labour troubles materially decreased the output in the Crow’s Nest of both coal and coke; it is in this latter district that most of the coke production of the province is made. Had it not been that the Crow’s Nest Collieries, through a series of mishaps—accompanied by a serious shortage of labour due to the war, followed by a labour strike—were unable to make as large an output as expected and intended, the coal and coke production would have been much greater, but as it was, there resulted such a shortage of coke as to partially close the copper smelters, and these in turn compelled the copper mines to very much curtail their outputs. The average selling prices taken this year in the calculation of value of product are the same as those used last year, that for coal being 3-50 dols., and for coke being 6 dols. a ton of 2,240 lb. The prices used in calculations prior to 1907 were 3 dols. and 5 dols. respectively. The reports of the inspectors state that a great deal of work has been done in trying to establish the coal areas in the Telkwa district, which has presented many difficulties owing to the exceedingly soft nature of the coal-bearing strata, which in most places have been eroded from the higher ridges, and there only remain isolated basins and a few detached remnants. How- ever, the coal area under consideration, especially on Goldstream Basin, is of great commercial importance, the extent of which has been proven by the outcrop of the seams followed by diamond drill work. The actual area of this coal field covers a surface of approximately 3,200 acres, under which there are three seams of coal of a thickness of 4|, 5J and 7 ft. re- spectively, amounting to a total thickness of 17 ft., and, taking the usual recognised custom of computa- tion of 1,000 tons per acre per foot, which includes 40 per cent, loss of coal, gives a gross total of 54,400,000 tons recoverable coal. A report by Mr. W. F. Robertson, provincial mineralogist, mentions that the market of the East Kootenay field is provided primarily by the railways of the south-eastern part of the province and of the northern parts of the adjoining States of Montana and Washington, approximately three-quarters of the coal, sold as such, being exported to those States, while the remainder went to supply the demands of the south-eastern part of the province—its domestic needs, its railways, steamboats, mines and smelters. The larger coasting steamers and railways, which in later years have all been using California crude oil as fuel, will be forced to come back to the use of coal, which will mean a largely increased production from coast collieries. —■ Cost of Coal Control Administration—Replying to a question recently put down by Mr. Gerald France, M.P, and postponed by request of the President of the Board of Trade, Sir Albert Stanley has written a letter in which he says that the total staff of the Coal Mines Department at present numbers 477. This figure includes a number of officials loaned by railway companies and the Railway Clearing House. The salaries of the staff paid by the Board of Trade direct amount to about £60,000 per annum, and the whole of this cost is borne by the Treasury. Thirteen members of the staff (including five borrowed Civil Servants) are in receipt of salaries of over £500 a year. The Treasury bears a certain part of the cost of local administration of the Coal Rationing schemes and part of the cost of the District Coal and Coke Supplies Committees, but at the moment no definite figure could be given as to what proportion of the total cost is borne by the Treasury.