396 THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. February 23, 1917. affected by this inspection and safety service will be reflected in the statistics for this year or next. It is, however, reasonable to believe that such a result will be effected within the next three or four years, providing as .good relative progress in the improvement of the condition of the mines is made during the next few years as during the past few months. A concrete example of the manner in which insurance inspection for fixing merit rates under workmen’s com- pensation has effected improvement in the condition of mines and the consequent safety of the workmen will doubtless make this more clear. The following is selected as representative of conditions occasionally encountered among the more dangerous gaseous and explosive mining districts :— Inspection was made of one of a group of large mines controlled by a powerful non-resident owner. The inspector found the mine in a very hazardous condition, on account of the presence of large quantities of explo- sive gas and of fine coal dust. All the elements neces- sary to a violent gas and dust explosion, which might destroy the 200 or more underground workers, were pre- sent. The mine was otherwise in a most unsafe condi- tion, because of lack of sufficient protection to men from falls of roof and coal, careless handling of explosives, bad condition of haulage ways, and general neglect of the safety of the mine workers. This condition existed in spite of the fact that the controlling corporation had employed an experienced mine manager, (superintendent and foremen. The trouble lay in the lack of pressure from a distant executive department for economy in operation, and cheapness of production or tonnage cost of coal, and consequent absorption of the local manage- ment in getting out the coal as cheaply as possible, to the neglect of safety conditions. Immediately upon receipt of the report of the insur- ance inspector, the head of the non-resident corpora- tion was notified of the condition, and told that unless the immediate hazards were removed within 48 hours, the insurance policy would be cancelled. The result was an immediate conference with the director of the inspec- tion and safety department of the Associated -Companies, who presented to the owner a detailed report, with the main facts of which the mine manager concurred; in sub- stance, to the effect that explosive coal dust was found in large quantities throughout the entries, rooms, and old workings; that gas in large qualities was given off in one entry to such an extent that it was found in highly explosive quantities at points 200 to 300 ft. distant, passing rooms in which miners were working with open lights. The only warning to prevent the men from coming in contact with the accumulations of gas was an old railway tie marked “ Danger ” lying across the rails but a few feet from the beginning of the gas area, and scarcely perceptible in the utter darkness of the mine, covered as it was with dust and coal. One miner was found to pass that with an open light, and when asked if he knew of the danger, said : “ Yes; fireboss told me to always watch and keep my lamp low.” In another entry containing explosive gas there were no warning signs to keep out men with open lights. The men working in the gaseous area had safety lamps, but on examination, two of these were found not locked and one in bad condition, so that all three were liable to have their flame come in contact with the gas. In this area the men were using such dangerous explosive's as dynamite, and pushing it into the holes without any tamping. In other cases, inflammable coal slack was being used for tamping black powder, and squibs, which emit (showers of sparks, were used in igniting the explosives. The result was that orders were issued by the owner for the immediate withdrawal of all workmen from the explosive district, and also for work to be begun promptly to improve the ventilation., system of timber- ing, methods of using powder, and otherwise place the mine in a safe condition as recomriiended by the Asso- ciated Companies. This condition is not uncommon in such regions. It is one which has caused disastrous explosions, killing in some instances hundreds of men. It is one to which the Federal Bureau of Mines has repeatedly called attention through its publications and its safety propa- ganda. The Bureau of Mines had, however, no juris- diction and no influence to improve such conditions, other than by (attracting attention to them. The State mine department had the lawful power to correct such conditions, but though they were known in this and other cases to the State inspectors, the latter found it impossible to effect improvements, partly due to condi- tions beyond their control. A State inspector can point out and suggest improvements, but he has little power to enforce them, in case the owner makes, an appeal to the courts, for it is usually almost impossible for the inspector to prove his case if his orders are contested. Even then the State inspector can, as a rule, secure only the improvement of the most obviously dangerous conditions. Even when these are improved, they remove only a portion of the accident causes, and the mine will 'still be a serious menace to the safety of the workmen, due to generally bad conditions. Power of Inspectors. The power possessed by the inspectors of the Asso- ciated Companies is of two kinds—first, as concerns the immediate catastrophe hazard through the threat of can- cellation of policy. The effect of such action is instan- taneous in the many cases where a mine is mortgaged with some trust company. The demand of a trustee that the danger be immediately removed and the oppor- tunity for insurance made available, or the mortgage would be cancelled, is necessarily productive of prompt compliance. The second source of power, to improve dangerous conditions other than from catastrophe hazard and the threat of cancellation, consists in the high pre- mium rate for insurance for an unsafe mine, which is developed by a schedule rating inspection, and the con- sequent fact that the money earned by the mine owner in premium reduction on a large pay-roll would fre- quently, in the first year alone, nearly pay for all the improvements demanded, and at the same time place the mine in a more safe and efficient working condition. Take, for example, an inspection report made shortly after the workmen’s compensation Act went into effect in one State, which showed for a group of mines employ- ing nearly 1,000 men an annual pay-roll of 500,000 dols., and a premium rate on first inspection of nearly 6 dols. per 100 dols. of pay-roll, or a total annual insurance premium of 30,000 dols. The improvements recom- mended would, if complied with, reduce this premium to less than 3 dols., and actually did so, with the resulting premium reduction from 30,000 to 15,000dols. per annum, a sum larger than was expended on all improve- ments made. The inspection charges are on a basis of 100 per cent, perfect for each of the 12 groups of hazards in a mine. The surface charges in the mines just referred to were charged 25 demerits out of a possible 100, this for unguarded gears, dangerous railway cross- ings, bad floors, etc. Shaft hazards were charged 37; underground haulage system, 61; hazards from falls of roof, 51; use of explosives, 60; electricity, 30; mine gas, 63; coal dust, 77; mine fires, 65; miscellaneous under- ground hazards, 37 demerits. The human element, or moral hazard, was charged 90 demerits, and absence of safety organisation, 62 demerits, a total average for the whole mine of 70-6 demerits out of a possible 100, whereas the average number of demerits which corre- sponds with the average condition of a mine in the State was 25. In this particular case, ‘as in many others, the prospect of reduction in premium to be paid on insurance was such that within four months a re-in- spection was requested by the assured on the ground that they had improved all the conditions on which there were charges. The re-inspection showed that in all mines operated by this company the represented total improvement had reduced the demerit charges to 8-5, as against 70*6 on first inspection; which led to a reduc- tion in premium rate from over 6 dols. per 100 dols. of pay-roll to 2’82 dels, per 100 dols. of pay-roll. This was equivalent to a saving of 15,000 dels, per annum in insurance premium, a sum more than sufficient to pay in one year for all the improvements made. That this condition is not an isolated one is evidenced by the fact that the 774 mines inspected and schedule- rated in Pennsylvania, for which re-inspection results are available for purposes of comparison, show an average ' premium rate on the first inspection of 3-78 dols. per 100 dols. of pay-roll, and an (average pre- mium rate on re-inspection of 2-82 dols. These sums correspond with and are an index to the improvements made in the safety condition of the mines. They indi- cate a saving in premium to mine owners of nearly 500,000 dols., and they represent the power of that sum of money as. a leverage to induce the mine operators to make the improvements represented by such great pre- mium reductions, and the corresponding improvement for the safety of the workers in the mines concerned. Attitude of Operators. As evidencing the attitude of the mine operators to workmen’s compensation insurance, thus administered, by private stock insurance companies, it is well to record that for several months this inspection service was the subject of opposition and criticism. Since inspections have been completed and reduced premium rates pro- mulgated, in many cases as a result of improved condi- tions, a much more friendly attitude has been shown. One of the leading mine operators reports :—“ The operating officials at our different properties were first inclined to be a little sceptical and critical, believing that no inspector acting under State or insurance authority could tell them how to improve the conditions of their mines. Since we have gone through it, however, it gives me great pleasure to say that we have found your inspection has been of great service .to us. Your inspectors have disclosed conditions which have enabled us to remove hazards, so that our properties are not only in far better condition as regards safety, but the changes we have made in our organisation and our methods put us in closer touch with our working force, with the result of increased efficiency and economy in operation. We will be more than repaid for the expense we have been put to in making the changes recommended.” The chief mine inspector of one of thei greatest mining States was somewhat sceptical, as were others, as to the possibility of bringing about further improve- ments than were practicable through his department, as a result of workmen’s compensation application and the cost of insurance thereunder, and he wrote that “ If all the suggestions contained in your -safety standards are complied with, a marked reduction in accidents would no doubt result. I have found saying and doing are entirely different things, and if you can succeed in forcing compliance with these rules, you will accom- plish what the State mining department has failed to accomplish for years, without complete success, and there should be a reduction of at least 50 per cent, fewer accidents.” Since the suggestions contained in the standards have been very fully complied with in a majority of cases, it is fair to- assume that his prediction will in some measure be fulfilled, and there will be a marked reduction in the number of accidents under the system adopted for the insurance protection of workmen’s compensation obli- gations. Attitude of State Boards. As evidencing the attitude of the State industrial boards and the State insurance departments toward this system of insurance and schedule rating by the Asso- ciated Companies, it is necessary to point only to the cordial relationship established in the three coal mining States in which the law provides for compulsory work- men’s compensation, coupled with a fair attitude toward an encouragement of private insurance for the obligation, viz., the States of Pennsylvania, Kentucky, and Colo- rado. In all three States the technical value of the safety standards and the system of inspection and schedule rating the various hazards within the mine has received official approval, and has been adopted for all insurance carriers in those States. In the States of Pennsylvania and Kentucky, the department of inspec- tion and safety of the Associated Companies has been authorised to act as a central inspection and schedule rating bureau for -all insurance carriers of coal mine risks, with the result that in those two States over 90 per cent, of the mines are insured with either the Asso- ciated Companies or the State fund, and are under the inspection and safety service of the Associated Com- panies, and, in consequence, vast sums have been expended in the improving of safety conditions in the mines of those- States. It- has been the experience of the Associated Com- panies in Pennsylvania, Iowa, and, at the present time, in Kentucky, that many operators, on receiving the report of their first inspection, have felt that the adjusted rate is high, and that the making of the numerous improvements recommended by the department of inspection and safety would be too great an undertaking. It has -also been found in a great many cases where -the reports have been returned to the operator by the carry- ing company, that the operator has been alarmed by the number of recommendations submitted, and has been inclined to throw up his hands without making a study of the various recommendations. When, however, these recommendations have been carefully explained, either by the agent of the carrying company or by an inspector for the Associated Companies, the operator frequently finds that neither the cost nor the work of complying with the recommendations is as great as he had anti- cipated. It is the desire of the Associated Companies to co-operate with the operator in bringing about the sug- gested improvements at the lowest possible cost. How well this department has succeeded in this matter is evidenced by a study of conditions in Pennsylvania bitu- minous mines. The base rate for these mines is 3‘83doliS. The first inspection of 1,293 mines produced an average rate of 3-56dols.; and .re-inspection of 694 of these mines produced an average rate of 2-94 dols., which was retroactive to the effective date of the policy. LABOUR AHU WAGES. South Wales and Monmouthshire. The dockers’ section of the Dock Workers’ Union held a mass meeting on Sunday, and discussed the scheme for pooling labour which has been designed for operation at Swansea Docks. Considerable opposition to the scheme was shown, more particularly with regard to the method of regis- tration and (allocation; and the meeting decided unanimously to give notice terminating the scheme. The attention of Mr. Neville Chamberlain, who is calling for registration of workers willing to undertake national service, has been drawn to the large number of tin-platers and others in the South Wales district who, although they enrolled some time ago, have not yet been given work. Apparently there is some difficulty -as between the different departments of the Government; and Mr. I. Gwynne, secre- tary of the Tin and Sheet Millmen’s Union, pointed out this fact at a conference of employers and others which has taken place in Swansea. At a recent meeting of the Monmouthshire Eastern Valley branch of the South Wales Miners’ Federation, permission was given to the workmen employed -at the Varteg Collieries to forward to the central executive council their application for power to tender notices in view of the refusal of a number of outside craftsmen to join the Miners’ Federation. The Ebbw Vale steel workers expressed disappointment at the fact of theiir deputation failing to secure an interview with Mr. Hodge, the Minister for Labour, he having declined to meet them until a statement of their case had been given in writing. A report was made to the annual meeting of the workmen’s side of the Sliding Scale Committee on Saturday, when it was stated that the present position had arisen in con-sequence of the last audit showing (advance of 4J per cent, in the selling prices, whilst only 2J per cent, increase of w-ages was offered by the employers.. A long- discussion took place, and it was decided that, unless some satisfactory progress had been made within a week, “ the question of further action ” should be dealt with. The colliery workmen’s inspectors met in Cardiff on Saturday, -and considered the question of co-operating with the Federation, it being suggested that a joint committee should consider what steps were necessary (to make the work of mining safer. The members present discussed the classi- fication of mines in respect of ventilation; also regulations as to the standard of oil; and the present methods of con- veying injured workmen from the collieries to their homes. The executive council of the Colliery Enginemen and Stokers’ Association held a meeting on Saturday, and con- sidered the scale of pay which had been drafted for different grades of men in the mechanical departments — all this involving increase. The schedule which has been drawn up is to be submitted to the next meeting of the Joint Board. The executive council of the South Wales Federation met in Cardiff on Saturday, and received the communication from the Board of Trade with regard to the control of mines. Its special point had relation to the financial position which will be created; and the executive decided not to take any action until after an interview with the Miners’ Federation of Great Britain had arranged to have with the Government Department. Sir George Askwith, of the Board of Trade, communicated with the Federation executive as to a dispute at the Tir- donkin Colliery, proposing that it should be referred for settlement to a tribunal, but the executive considered it was not a matter which should be so decided, and therefore instructed their secretary to communicate that fact to Sir George Askwith. North of England. A dispute has occurred at No. 5 Colliery, Aspatria, and between 200 and 300 men and boys became idle for a time. The cause of the dispute is the unwilling- ness of the men to accept new conditions of employment for two banksmen. These conditions are said to be a reduction