February 9, 1917. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. 291 THE USE OF COAL ASH IN SAND STOWAGE/ By C. Toombs. Some time ago it was decided to extend underground sand-filling operations at the East Band Proprietary Mines, by utilising the sand from one of the dumps for that purpose. A trial run was made by the ordinary water-borne methods, but troubles due to its extreme acidity arose, which would be too costly to deal with by means of ordinary neutralising agents, such as lime or crude soda carbonate. One sample of the water carrying this sand under- ground gave a total available acidity of 1’71 per cent, sulphuric acid, requiring 160 lb. air-slaked lime containing 60 per cent, calcium oxide per 1,000 gallons. (By total available acidity is meant sulphuric acid + ferrous and ferric sulphates.) To overcome this difficulty and large expense, a novel scheme was suggested, which was to mix ordinary ash from the ash dumps, with the acid sand, and send both underground as filler. Most Transvaal coals when burnt give an ash con- taining lime, the amount of which varies with the ash percentage. When the ash is fresh from the furnaces, the lime is present in the form of calcium oxide, samples giving from 25 lb. to 40 lb. calcium oxide per ton of ash, by sugar solution test, being found at one of the boiler plants. At another plant where mechanical stokers are installed and combustion of the coal is almost complete, the lime was found to have combined with silica, forming a clinker which had practically no acid-neutralising powers. After the ash has been exposed to the weather on the dump for a short time, the calcium oxide is all converted into carbonate, and tests by the sugar method on com- paratively new ash, give very little calcium oxide. A short account of the experimental work carried out before the scheme was put into operation may be of interest. Ash. Several samples of ash from the various ash dumps were obtained and their acid-neutralising powers tested as follows 1,000 gm. of ash was stirred up for a couple of minutes with 2,u00 cc. semi-normal acid, when some of the acid was drawn off and tested, the loss in strength of the acid being calculated into pounds of calcium oxide per ton of ash. The test was rough, but sufficiently accurate for the purpose required. The following yields of CaO per ton were obtained:—A, 48 lb.; B, 58 lb.; C, 33 lb.; D, 13 lb.; E, 2 lb.; F, 12 lb. Sample D was a badly burnt coal. Sample E, new ash from mechanical stokers. Sample F from ash dump from same mechanical stokers as E. The higher result compared with E may be due to disintegration of calcium silicate on exposure to weather. Sand. Several samples of sand were taken from a cutting in the dump, and their lime-consuming powers determined. The lime-consuming substances in the old dump sand are sulphuric acid, ferric and ferrous sulphates, varying in proportion and in relation to one another according to whether the sample was taken deep or near the surface. An average of several samples, calculating the iron salts as sulphuric acid, gave a total acidity of about IT per cent., requiring about 20 lb. air-slaked lime containing 60 per cent. CaO per ton of sand On a basis of 1,000 tons of sand per day, 10 tons air-slaked lime, costing £25, would be required to give a neutral overflow and drainage water. Sand and Ash. From the above determinations, calculations for a neutral mixture of sand and ash were made, and a few experiments carried out with 50 lb. lots of sand. The quantities of sand and ash were weighed and thoroughly mixed with water in a small tank, the water was drawn off and leached through several times, then tested. It was found to be neutral, or slightly alkaline to methyl orange, pointing to the elimination of free sulphuric acid. It had an acid reaction with phenolptbalein, and on examination was found to be free from ferric sulphate, but contained ferrous sulphate in abundance. Further experiments were made with an increasing ratio of ash to sand, but the ferrous sulphate was found to remain unprecipitated. A further couple of experiments with fresh ash from the furnaces proved more successful, giving a water free from acid and salts of iron. Knowing that the difference between the fresh ash and that from the dump was, that in the new ash the lime existed as oxide, but as carbonate in that from the dump, the only theory one could establish was that ferrous sulphate in solution was not precipitated by calcium carbonate. To prove if this theory was correct, further experi- ments with made-up solutions containing sulphuric acid, ferric and ferrous sulphates were done. Various forms of calcium carbonate were tried—powdered lime- stone, powdered calcite, and precipitated calcium carbonate—the result in each case being the same, sulphuric acid and ferric sulphate eliminated, ferrous sulphate remaining. A long tube was filled with granular pieces of very soft limestone, and the solution passed through it repeatedly, the ferrous sulphate remaining at the end of a considerable period. These ferrous sulphate determinations were not quantitative, but were made qualitatively to obtain sufficient knowledge for the successful carrying out of the work in hand. The conclusion that one must come to from these experiments is that ferrous sulphate in solution does not react with calcium carbonate, and that the use of calcium carbonate for neutralising acid underground waters will not achieve all that should be desired— viz., the elimination of all acid and acid-producing substances. * The Journal of the Chemical, Metallurgical and Mining Society of South Africa. It may be mentioned that, some time ago, a sample of very finely powdered limestone was submitted for examination, with a view to use on underground waters. The results obtained with it were excellent, but analysis showed that it was not limestone, as it contained about 30 per cent, calcium oxide. A mixture of calcium oxide and calcium carbonate would not be economical, as the former, being soluble and more chemically active, would react at once with the sulphuric acid and ferric sulphare, leaving a large proportion of the carbonate unused. The fact that ferrous sulphate in solution does not react with calcium carbonate was new to me, and several chemists to whom the matter was referred said that they would expect these substances to react, giving a precipitate of ferrous carbonate. Dr. Moir explained their non-reaction by saying that FeO as the base in FeS04 was stronger than CaO as the base in CaCO3. Following are the details of some of the experiments made with mixtures of sand and ash :— A. San-1 requiring 21 ]b. lime per ton. Ash from dump containing40 lb. CaC03 per ton, and CaO 0'7lb. per ton. Mixture. (a) 100 sand 20 ash (0 100 sand 40 ash (c) 100 sand 60 ash (d) 100 sand 80 ash (e) 100 s and 100 ash Result. C Free acid and ferric sulphate gone. Ferrous 1 sulphate left requiring 11 lb. lime per ton j of sand. L Saving in lime 101b. per ton of sand. r Ferrous sulphate left requires 7flb. per j ton sand. (. Saving in lime 134 lb. per ton sand. C Ferrous sulphate requires 5 lb. lime per ton j of sand L S wing in lime, 16 lb. per ton sand. 1 Further lime required is 2^ lb. per ton of j sand. (. Saving in lime, 184 lb. per t