716 THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN October 13, 1916. Notes from the Coal Fields. [Local Correspondence.] South Wales and Monmouthshire. Absentees and Exemption—Mr. Smillie's Declaration—Mr. Hartshorn's Exhortation—Cardiff's Complaint Against Swansea Committee—Serious Delays in French Ports— Right to Supply of House Coal. The question of absenteeism has broadened seriously, for it is felt that if colliers, protected from military service because of being in a certified occupation, will not work satis- factorily, there should be re-consideration of their exemption. This feeling is growing in the colliery districts, and accounts for stricter lines the tribunals arc taking, and is intensified by the exigencies of married men in the non-collier class who are being drafted into the Army under the compulsory law. Feeling is deepened when it is noticed that hundreds of young colliers fill the streets of the colliery towns, crowd the cinemas at night, are at liberty to work when they plea-se, and stand idle as often as they choose. What action the authorities may take in this question is as yet a matter of speculation-; but that some action ought to be taken, and probably will be taken, is not doubted—unless their is steadier application to production. Mr. Smill'ie, president of the Miners’ Federation of Great Britain, who attended a meeting at Brynmawr on Monday, made very pertinent reference to the absentees. He said that men of military ago in a colliery, who were exempted from military service, should work as steadily as possible. He was quite aware that in some districts the output of coal could be increased by 20 per cent, if there were regular attendance at the colliery. Some men would stay away two, three, or even four days a week, in some cases without reasonable causes; and there wore some who absolutely refused to come to the pit more than two or three days a week, and were not amenable to the local committee. In appealing to his hearers to work regularly, he said they must not only do this in order to prevent the suspension of the Eight Flours Act, but also to prevent reduction of the age at which lads could be taken underground. This reference to the suspension of the Eight Hours Act shows that Mr. Smillie has been made aware of the feeling to which reference is made; for it is upon this point of the law-restricted hours of work, as well as the irregularity, that local opinion concentrates. Two objects are in view : first, that men liable to, but exempted from, military service in order to maintain the output of coal, should be compelled to work regularly; and, secondly, that in the national emer- gency. the Eight Hours Act, which was passed under peace conditions, in altogether cliff erent circumstances, should be suspended from operation so long as hostilities continue. Much more is likely to be heard of this question, for the feel- ing is general, and there is evident determination that exist- ing unsatisfactory conditions should not continue. In defence of the men, Mr. George Barker, pne of the Monmouthshire miners’ leaders, asserts that some of the returns as to “ absentees ” are not justified, and he instances a case where 85 men were sent back from the colliery at 6 a.m. because they were not down the pit when the hooter sounded, although they were at the top considerably before 6 o’clock, but were unable to descend through lack of facilities. Similar incidents have been alleged as to other places. The tables drawn up by Mr. Finlay Gibson, secretary of the Coal Owners’ Association, have demonstrated that there is a very large amount of “ avoidable ” absenteeism; and the conviction now prevails that the joint scheme arranged with the workmen as to local committees iat the collieries—a scheme suggested by the men’s representatives—has not proved successful, notwithstanding appeals repeatedly made to the men by their leaders. Reports from these joint committees make it clear that they are not satisfactorily in operation in so many as even half of the collieries, although more returns are expected to come in. But these returns, so far as they have been received, go to confirm the conviction that the percentage of “ avoidable,” as distinct from the “ unavoid- able,” is very high. Among those who are urging the men to work better is Mr. Hartshorn, who has just issued a powerful appeal describing the coal output as a great factor in the prosecu- tion of the war, and pointing out that every colliery worker lias a great moral and national responsibility cast upon him in regard to this. He states that the main pillar of the Allies’ cause is the coal industry of this country, “ because it is the real foundation of all the other industries which are necessary for the production of the enormous stores of war material which we must have.” He shows that, as the military authorities are gradually returning to the mines men who have gone into the fighting forces, but can render greater national service in maintaining the coal output* the men who are in the mines should see in this fact how urgent is the demand. Although the deficit of 30,000,000 tons in the year ended July 1915 was reduced in the year ended July 1916, this improvement is not nearly sufficient, for the need for coal is much greater than it was in peace time. He states that a great deal more can be done by reducing absenteeism, for the output can be improved to the extent of 13,000,000 to 14,000,000 tons per annum if the “ avoidable ” absenteeism were extinguished. He regards 'the returns from some districts as not satisfactory; calls upon the men to view the question from the standpoint of national welfare; and takes the point