July 28, 1916. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. 161 “British Baum” Coal Washing Plant. (SPECIALLY CONTRIBUTED.) The ordinary accepted theory of coal washing is that the coal must first be sized, so that the particles of coal and dirt to be separated are approximately equal in cubic content. This theory is based upon the fact that two such particles of different densities placed in still • water would sink with different velocities, or, in other words, the heavy piece of dirt would fall through the water at a quicker rate than the lighter piece of coal. Knowing the density, then, and the size of the particles, the rate of fall can be calculated; and in washing minerals this fact is recognised, by arranging or design- ing the washer box so as to give an upward flow of water at such a rate that, whilst allowing the heavy particles 'to sink, the lighter particles’—e.g., coal, in a coal washer—would remain on the surface of the water and flow off with it. Hence, in the ordinary design of a washery, the wash boxes are made in units, and each unit is arranged to deal with a certain size of coal. The “ Baum ” patent washer box, however, has quite upset this theory, inasmuch as there is no classification before washing, 'the different sizes from 3 in. cubes to nothing all passing through the same washer box. It is true that perfect results are not obtained, so far as regards the very fine coal, say, coal particles below in., when these are being washed with coal up to 3 in. cube; but it is mainly a question of degree as to the required ash content of the washed product, and this again depends upon the relative proportions of large and fine coal. If, for instance, the proportion of very fine coal is not high, then, in all probability, quite satisfactory results can be obtained .by a single washing. On the other hand, if a very considerable proportion of the coal is fine, and a minimum ash content is required, it may be necessary to re-wash this fine coal. Womb well Washery. The washery at Wombwell Colliery is of the latter type, the coal dealt with being all from 1| in. to nothing, all below f in. being used for coking. In the ordinary type of washer box, the rise and fall of the water is obtained by means of pistons or plungers operated by eccentrics, or sometimes by means of levers, whereby the piston may receive a quick downstroke and a slow upstroke. In the “ Baum,’’ however, as is now well known, the pulsation of the water in the washer box is obtained by means of compressed air, furnished by an eccentrically-driven four-blade blower, which supplies air at a pressure of about 2 lb. per square inch /at the valve. The washer box consists of a tank divided into two chambers : one an air chamber, with the air valve fitted on top; the other the washing chamber, provided with a gauze or perforated plates, upon which the mix- ture of coal and dirt is received. The mixture is flushed with water into the washer box at one end, and is sub- jected both to the pulsation set up in the water by the action of the compressed air, and to the flow of water across the washer box to the outlet at the other end. It would appear that the effect of this cross-flow of water was not sufficiently considered in arriving at the theory above mentioned, as the results obtained in the “ Baum ’’ washer box conclusively prove that different- sized cubes can be efficiently dealt with in the same box. At Wombwell Colliery all the coal passing through a mesh of 1| in. is washed, but as 30 per cent, of this is below one-fiftieth of an inch, and it is necessary to reduce the ash content to 'the lowest possible amount, the fine coal below f in. is re-washed. The washery is placed close to the screens, and, as will be seen from the accom- panying plans, is built over the railway lines, one of which is the main locomotive road, which had to be kept open during the whole period of erection. The coal is received direct from the screens by means of conveyor belts, and delivered to the hopper B at A, section C.C., from whence it is raised by means of the elevator to the washer box D. This box consists of two sections, Dx and D2—the coal entering at Dx and passing off at D2—and is also provided with two dirt elevators, Sx and S2, one at each end. Most of the dirt passes off the perforated plate through a gate into the elevators, but the fine dirt which passes through /the perforations is caught in a spiral conveyor at the bottom of the box, and carried into the dirt elevator. The whole action, therefore, is absolutely automatic, and there are no levers or valves to be constantly manipulated by the attendant. After being washed, the coal is conveyed in a canal to the revolving screen E, where it is sized into two classes of nuts, viz., If in. to 1 in. and 1 in. to fin., all below f in. being raised by the elevator H into the washer box D3, where it is re-washed, and afterwards conveyed in a canal—shown by the dotted lines in the plan I—I.—to the draining screen J, section A—A, and to the slurry refiner 0. This latter consists of a set of very fine mesh vibrating screens, set at a slight inclination towards the delivery end. The coal and water pour on to the lower end of these screens, and the effect of the vibration is to shake out the water, the coal gradually creeping up the screen, and becoming, at the same time, drier and drier, until it is delivered, over the end of the screen, as pure fine smudge coal, containing only 15 to 20 per cent, of moisture. The drainage water and fine slurry saturated with coal dust from the screen J is collected in the sump L, and is pumped up, by means of the pump M, into the large conical settling tank N. This consists of a large concrete structure, set upon a square base, with railway lines passing underneath. The diameter at the top is about 40 ft., and at the bottom it is fitted with a 10 in. diameter pipe and valve. The fine coal dust settles to the bottom of this cone, and, in the form of slurry, is delivered through pipes to the smudge or slurry refiner previously described. The small coal from the screen J is delivered into a large draining conveyor K, fitted with a perforated bottom, and moving forward at the rate of from 12 to 18 in. per minute. This conveyor is constructed in such a manner that the division plates alternately close together and open outwards, which has the effect of first compressing or squeezing the coal, and then loosen- ing it, thus breaking it up, so to speak, and allowing moisture, which would be retained in 'the solid or fixed type of bucket, to escape. The fine smudge from the slurry refiner is delivered on top of the coal in this con- veyor, and the coal is discharged at the top into the disintegrators Px and P2, with approximately 12 per cent, of moisture. From these disintegrators or crushers the coal is delivered on to a rubber belt con- veyor, and carried to the coke oven service bunker; All the water from the draining conveyor flows back to the sump L, from whence it is pumped to the settling tank. Returning to the revolving screen, which, as already explained, separates the two sizes of nuts from the fine coal which passes to the re-washer, the nuts, after being separated, are flushed down canals with “ glass ’’ bottoms to “ jigging ” draining tables, the large nuts to table Fo and the small nuts to Fx (section C—C), where the water is drained off, and the nuts are delivered into the bunkers Gx and G2 respectively. A third bunker, G3, is provided for the storage of coal for coking, and is fed by a shoot from the bottom of the crusher casing. From these bunkers the coal is delivered into wagons as required. It will also be noticed that the bunkers for the nut coal are provided with spiral shoots, to mini- mise breakage. Provision is also made for discharging coal from rail- way wagons into the raw coal bunker B, as is shown in plans I—I and 2—2. The water for washing is used over and over again, and the only addition of fresh water necessary is for replacing that carried away by the coal and dirt in the shape of moisture, most of it going off with the coking coal and fine dirt. The fact that the water can be used repeatedly is due to the great efficiency of the drainage system, viz., the slurry refiner and the drainage conveyor, ass the water draining through the coal is also filtered, and is therefore quite clean as it flows back to the sump. So clean, in fact, is the water, that the nut coals are discharged straight into the bunkers from the revolving screen quite bright, and do not require the usual subsequent spraying wd'th clean water. The dirt from the dirt elevators is deposited in the bunkers T, and T2. The elevators are provided with perforated buckets, from which the water is drained. The plant forms an imposing structure, and the machinery works smoothly and continuously, only a minimum of labour being required. Where possible, all shafting and journals, are fitted with some suitable form of self-lubrication, depending upon the position and speed of rotation of the shaft. The bucket chains in the large elevator, instead of working on slides, as is the usual arrangement for this type of elevator, run on rollers, the axles of which are self-lubricated. There is an absence of vibration, as no moving pistons or plungers are used in the washer boxes. The only moving piece of machinery is the air-con- trolling valve, which consists of a sleeve piston operated by an eccentric. The number of pulsations depends upon the number of strokes of the valve; the height of the stroke, or rise of the water in the washing compartment, is regulated by simply adjusting the quantity as well as the pressure of the air to the air compartment. There is considerable elasticity in the use of air for causing the pulsations. By adjusting the valve, air may be admitted to cause a short and ener- getic upward stroke of water through the perforated plate and washer bed, and exhausted slowly and gently, so as to give ample time for the mixed coal and dirt to separate according to their specific gravities. The dirt elevators are open, and may be inspected frequently, so that any irregularities can be detected, and the defec- tive working traced out and put right. The slurry refiner is really an excellent piece of apparatus, and well worth the attention of those who have difficulties in satisfactorily draining fine coal— especially in connection with coke ovens, "it gets rid at once of the unsightly settling ponds, which not only occupy considerably space, but involve heavy expense in recovering the coal after settling. The contractors for the plant are Messrs. Simon- Carves Limited, of Manchester, who kindly supplied the drawing from which the accompanying illustrations were prepared, and obtained the necessary permission from the owners of the washery—Messrs, the Womb well Colliery Company Limited—for the writer to inspect the plant for the purpose of this article. SOCIETY OF CHEMICAL INDUSTRY. Our Coal Supply. At the annual meeting of the Society of Chemical Industry in Edinburgh last week, Dr. Charles Carpenter, of the South Metropolitan Gas Company, London, presiding, Prof. Henry Louis, Newcastle, con- tributed a paper on “ Waste in Coal Production.’’ (Sec next page.) In the course of the discussion, Prof. H. E. Armstrong asked whether one source of waste was not the decaying of pit props, which might well be treated with some preservative.—Mr. W. F. Reid suggested that reinforced concrete props could be substituted; but Prof. Louis said that these had been tried, and had proved insufficiently resilient. Moreover, they gave no warn- ing of approaching collapse. If wood became much dearer, it might prove worth while to use steel props. Fuel Economy. Prof. H. E. Armstrong, F.R.S., Durham, submitted a paper on “ Fuel Economy : A National Policy Required.” He said that not only was coal dear beyond all expectations, and procurable with difficulty, but we were in face of an absolute shortage of liquid fuel for internal combustion engines, and of a shortage of the dyestuffs that were made from various products of the destructive distillation of coal—partly because of a lack of raw material. Should they not memorialise Govern- ment at once to foreshadow legislation prohibiting the use of raw coal, as a fuel, at no distant date? He was told that the use of raw coal was stopped in Germany at an early period of the war. There were many problems connected with the economical use of coal which must be fully enquired into. It wa^ essential that both the funds and the machinery for such enquiry should be provided without delay. The appointment of a central national fuel board to initiate and supervise all neces- sary enquiries would seem to be the first step that was called for, and no better way of obtaining funds could well be suggested than that of a small tax on all coal raised in the country. Discussion. The Chairman commented on the anomaly of per- mitting so much of the nitrogen content of coal to be wasted at a time, when efforts were being made to estab- lish a synthetic nitrogen industry in this country.—Dr. E. F. Armstrong argued that manufacturers should endeavour to economise coal, instancing one firm which employed the whole services of a skilled chemist in studying the economy of fuel and water supply, with excellent results.—References were made to the smoke abatement work of certain corporations. One or two members mentioned the objectionable amount of ash produced by smokeless fuel.—Dr. Dunn suggested that the smokeless fuel might be gasified, and the gas used more readily.—It was generally agreed that the time was not ripe for the prohibition of the use of solid fuel. —Mr. Roberts said that for the purposes of the pottery industry, solid fuel was an absolute necessity. Gas firing was of no use owing to the rapid deterioration of the kilns.—Prof. Armstrong, in neplying, said that the ash difficulty was non-existent if a good coal washer was used. He urged the society to take some common action, and assert their authority on this question. He was confident that the general adoption of low tempera- ture distillation was at hand, and he recommended the gas industry to put its house in order. Dr. G. P. Lishman read a paper on “ Some Recent Improvements in Coke Oven Practice.” (See page 163.) Presidential Address. Dr. Carpenter, in his presidential address, said there never existed so suitable a problem for a round-table conference as that of the utilisation of the fuel supplies of the kingdom. Our coal resources were the most important of our capital assets. Yet the bulk of the country was busily engaged either in squandering that capital or bartering it away and living on the proceeds. Should the development and utilisation of our coal resources be left unrestrictedly to the individual or group of individuals acquiring mining rights, generating energy, or warming their dwellings, or should such matters be subject to State supervision and control? War and the Tar Industry. Mr. W. H. Coleman, Glasgow, submitted a paper on “ The Influence of the European War on the Tar Dis- tillation Industry.” After the war the price of pitch fell considerably, due to the stoppage of exports. Several proposals had been made to find outlets for the surplus; and he thought that the briquette making industry held out considerable promise. In this country the tar industry had suffered from a lack of co-operation among the workers. He quite realised the difficulties in the way of such co-operation, but felt sure if we were to recapture the fine chemical and colour trade from Germany we must be prepared to give a good deal more scientific attention to the tar industry than had been the case in the past. The Coal Tar Colour Industry. Air. C. AL Whittaker, B.Se., of British Dyes Limited, gave a paper on “ The British Coal Tar Colour Industry and its Difficulties in War Time.” In the early days of the industry Germany was dependent on outside countries, particularly Great Britain,for the iaw material of the industry, but the modern coke oven recovery plant