112 THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN July 21, 1916. were enabled to locate their position. They had then sunk 800 yds., landing at the point marked P on the section. But irrespective of any fossils, they could really correlate their seams with those of Shropshire, north of Coalbrookdale. They could not correlate with Coalbrookdale, because Highley was the first point of correlation. He was entirely in agreement with Dr. Arber as to the north of Colwich. There was no corre- lation by seam as between the northern part of the Shropshire coal field and Cannock Chase—certainly not !as regarded Shifnal and the Wellington part of the field. From the western side, his (Mr. Forrest’s) firm had proved, driving westward, but did not meet with, the silurian bank in the position the author had shown it. Another point on which he would like to ask Dr. Arber’s opinion was whether the Silurians were found heavily charged with water. In the Cannock Chase coal fields, wherever they got into the Silurians, they always got a head of water; but 'there were parts of the coal field where the Silurians were not so charged. In one area there was a double fault : one at a depth of 120 yds., and the other at 360 yds., and he came to the conclu- sion that it would be perfectly safe to drive in between the faults. At the upper fault they got 2,000 gals, per minute of salt water. That was a costly and trouble- some experience, but it was clear there was a division, and at a certain point much below the salt water emis- sion they were quite dry. He would not be surprised if the silurian bank was cut off in the east; but from that fault to the eastern side he believed there was a Horizons. Warwickshire. South Staffordshire. Wyre Forest and Coalbrookdale. ? Stephanian Enville series (Corley and Kenilworth beds) (Red unproductives) Enville series f Clent group (Romsley „ (Red unproductives) Enville series (Red unproductives) Upper coal measures Keele series Red unproductives) Keele series (Red unproductives) Keele series (Red unproductives) Westphalian. Transition coal measures Haunchwood sandstones Nuneaton clays (Red-grey unproductives) A Illey group Halesowen ) Hasbury „ series ) Halesowen group IWitley Red clay series (Red-grey unproductives) Sulphur coal series (Red-grey productives) Middle coal measures ... Grey productives Grey productives Sweet coal series (Grey or red-grey productives) LLower coal measures Absent Absent Absent very large tract of valuable ground—miles of it. Pro- bably the coal measures would be found upside down, rolled in and out. It was clear there was no correla- tion between the Wyre Forest and South Staffordshire. If the study had been carried further north, it would have been still more useful, since the coal field there had more chance of being productive than that further south. With regard to the Bentley fault, it would be interesting to know whether that fault was a continua- tion of the one through the back of the western coal measures, and dividing the Thick coal measures from the Cannock Chase measures on the western side of the Cannock Chase coal field. There were indications of an obvious jumble on the western side, and between the Wyre coal field at Highley and North Staffordshire there were some conditions which appeared to bear out entirely the theories of Dr. Arber. In North Staffordshire the measures dipped to south-west, and at one point there was a depth of 760 yds., whilst very much farther north the depth was 380 to 480 yds. If the fault continued, it would throw up those measures. The President suggested that, in view of the some- what complex character of the paper, it would be well to defer the discussion to the next meeting, on October 16. He proposed a hearty vote of thanks to Dr. Arber. Mr. Forrest seconded, remarking that the paper had been of the greatest value to himself. The resolution was carried with acclamation. Dr. Arber, acknowledging the vote, thanked the meeting for its kind reception. The first point to deter- mine was whether the coal field was anticlinal or synclinal. If it was synclinal they might accept what he had put before them. He would be glad to have any suggestion that would assist in elucidating the points raised. The whole point of the horst was that nothing was pushed up; the other portions were pushed down. The boundary fault was an extremely complicated question, because those faults were double in many cases. It was quite true that the silurian banks looked very near, but the only case where they were sure of the location was that of Claverley, coming from the western measures to South Staffordshire. With regard to the Bentley fault, the matter was not quite simple, because there was a fold there as well. The explanation of the Cannock Chase coal field given by Jukes would have to be abandoned. Mr. Kay, his colleague, hoped some day to elucidate that fault. Grimsby Coal Exports.—The following quantities of coal have been exported from Grimsby during the week ended July 14:—Foreign : To Dieppe, 883 tons; Dunkirk, 667; Esbjerg, 1,230; Gravelines, 67; and Treport, 135 — total, 2,982 tons foreign, against 12,426 tons during the correspond- ing week of last year. STRUCTURE OF THE SOUTH STAF- FORDSHIRE COAL FIELD.* By. E. A. Newell Arber, M.A., Sc.D., F.G.S. Introduction. Dr. Arber stated that for some years past he had been engaged on special studies of the South Staffordshire coal field and the adjoining coal fields of Warwickshire and Wyre Fore st-Coalbrookdale. The purpose of these investigations was firstly to determine which palaeo- botanical horizons were represented in each field, and thus to institute the standard of comparison between them. The results obtained by this method had been already published by the author in the case of the Wyre Forest and South Staffordshire coal fields, and by his former pupil, Mr. R. D. Vernon, in the case of the Warwickshire area. This work has been reviewed here with special reference to the points which still remained in doubt. In the present paper, Dr. Arber also proposed to consider the general geological conclusions which result from this work, in particular from the more recent study of the South Staffordshire coal field. These con- siderations included a discussion on the original relation- ship of these coal fields, and on the nature of the con- cealed ground between them, and were therefore of importance from the industrial standpoint. The follow- ing table summarised the development and the palaeo- botanical horizons met with in each of the three fields so far as they were known. It would be seen from the above table that the litho- logical development of the measures in Warwickshire and South Staffordshire were very similar, but that the Wyre Forest-Coalbrookdale field differed from the others in the fact that the transition coal measures were pro- ductive, and that, in some of the Welsh borderland fields, the middle coal measures were a red-grey, whilst in others they were a grey series. Dr. Arber pointed out that on this question of rela- tionships he had arrived at conclusions which were diametrically opposed to those which constituted the accepted explanation at the present time. He had ven- tured to add here an alternative hypothesis. He wished to express his indebtedness to many friends, particularly in South Staffordshire, who had assisted him in the matter of the geological or topo- graphical information. In this respect he particularly desired to express his thanks to Mr. Henry Kay, F.G.S., of Birmingham; to Mr. W. Wickham King, F.G.S., of Hagley; and to Mr. H. W. Hughes, F.G.S., of Dudley, to whose unrivalled knowledge of the field he was greatly indebted. The Lithological Succession in the South Staffordshire Coal Field. The two-fold grouping of the measures into a lower productive and an upper unproductive series was a perfectly natural one. By the latter term, however, it was not implied that coal seams were entirely absent. Coals did occur on several horizons in these beds, but they were few in number, and never of sufficient thick- ness to be of any economic importance. The two series were further contrasted as regards the dominant colours of the sediments. The lower productive sequence was a grey series. The upper division consisted of a lower red-grey group, in which red alternated with grey rocks, and a higher division wholly red in colour. As to these facts, there was no dispute, though much doubt and difficulty had existed for many years past as to how much of the unproductive series was of carboni- ferous age, and whether part at least of it should not be relegated to the permian. These were questions which would be discussed here in some detail. The following was the grouping which had been adopted, and would be defended in the present paper :— (a) The Enville Series. — The points in which the above classification differed from the schemes previously put forward, was firstly in the inclusion of the whole of these measures in the upper carboniferous, and secondly in the nomenclature applied to the highest beds. It was a perfectly conformable series throughout. The red clay series of Jukes was followed by the Halesowen series, and then the Keele group. These terms had all been in use in South Staffordshire for some years past. * From a paper read before the South Staffordshire and Warwickshire Institute of Mining Engineers. The sub-division of the Halesowen series adopted here, was in the main that recently advocated by Mr. Kay. Still further to the south, higher beds, which reached their maximum development in the Enville district of Shropshire, followed conformably on the Keele group. These were usually termed the middle and upper divi- sions of the Salopian permian of Hull. For reasons which would be fully discussed at a later stage, in this paper, Dr. Arber regarded these as probably Stephanian, and not permian, in age. It had seemed to him advis- able, since the term “ Salopian ” was so intimately connected with the word “ permian,” to apply some other name to these beds, which should be non-com- mittal as regards geological age. It might be appro- priate to institute the term ” Enville series ” for these sediments, and thus associate them with the region where they attained their maximum development. The two local sub-divisions of the Enville series might be also conveniently named after the localities in which they were best known in this coal field, namely, the trappoid breccia (part of the upper Salopian permian) of the Clent Hills as the Clent group, and the calcareous group below it (the old middle permian) resting on the Keele series, as the Romsley group. These two terms, however, were only intended to be names of purely local significance, confined to this field. The precise age of the Enville series was still very difficult to demonstrate. Despite repeated endeavours on the part of the author and others, it had not so far been found possible to obtain sufficient palaeontological evidence. As regards the Romsley beds, the only fossil which had ever been obtained from these beds in the southern area, as the result of the labours of a large number of previous workers, was Spirorbis, a genus of wide vertical, and lateral distribution in the Midlands. A study of the red ground to the south of the visible field had, however, convinced the author that the Keele and Enville series were intimately related, forming everywhere a perfectly Conformable graded sequence. He was also quite convinced that these measures were all of the same geological age, though they did not neces- sarily all belong to the same horizon. If the age of one series could be shown to be carboniferous, as he believed it could, then, in his opinion, the whole was an upper carboniferous and not a permian sequence. This was a vexed question on which much had already been said. When we turned to the eastern border of the field, we found further data. The beds passed through in the shaking of the Hamstead Colliery, between 1,008 and 1,233 ft. from the surface, were the equivalents of the Keele series of the southern extremity of the field. From these red rocks in 1888 Dr. Kidston described a series of plants forming an undoubted upper coal measure assemblage. Further, from the Great Barr Quarries, close to Ham- stead Colliery, Mr. Hardaker had recently described both plant remains and footprints. These fossils were admittedly from a higher level than the Keele group penetrated in the colliery sinking. The rocks consisted of marls and sandstones with conglomerates, and they underlay breccias. They were thus clearly the exact equivalents of the Romsley group of the southern part of the field. The plant remains consisted of Walchia piniformis (Schl.), Walchia imbricata (Schl.), and Artisia (Sternbergia) sp. In addition, 11 types of foot- prints were described from these beds. Mr. Hardaker had no hesitation in regarding these beds as representa- tive of a part of the Rothliegende of Germany—that is to say, the Hamstead Quarry series must in the future be definitely regarded as of lower permian age. Here we had a further, 'and quite recent, support for the attribution of these beds to the permian rather than the carboniferous, and one which was particularly important, since it was based on palaeontological evidence. In the author’s opinion, however, no such conclusions could be safely drawn from these fossils. He more than doubted whether any of them were of value, as indicating any one of the following horizons in particular, viz., Westphalian, Stephanian, lower or middle permian. It had yet to be proved that any of these fossils were confined to the lower permian, in which, however, there was no dispute that they may occur. But the matter did not rest there entirely. The Romsley beds of South Staffordshire were admittedly accumulations of a desert type, and in such, as was well known, fossils were comparatively rare. It was a matter of common observation that, in desert accumu- lations of the permo-carboniferous age (whatever horizon they might belong to), the commonest fossils were often members of the genus Walchia among plants, whilst the associated traces of animals were chiefly ichia, or footprints. The occurrence of such fossils in the Romsley beds was exactly what we should expect to find in such a red series, and they fold us nothing as to the true horizon. The abundance of Walchia. to the exclusion of other plant types, in the true Rothliegende of the Continent was another standard example. Walchia seemed to have been a type of conifer, which flourished well under desert conditions, though it also no doubt managed to exist under other environments. Mr. Cantrill had discovered Spirorbis in this series in the southern region of the field. The author had else- where dealt at some length with the distribution of this fossil in the British carboniferous rocks, and had pointed out that, while this fossil was often particularly abun- dant in the transition and upper coal measures of this country, it really occurred throughout the whole of the carboniferous, and was therefore of no real value as a stratigraphical index. At the same time its occurrence in the Enville series was in favour of a carboniferous, rather than a permian, age being assigned to these beds. (7>) The Keele and Other Scries.—With regard to the pahrbotanical horizons of the Keele, and the measures beneath that series, there was now no uncertainty. In his most recent memoir on the subject. Dr. Kidston has