May 12, 1916. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. 897 The Chairman asked how, in the event of one of these large trams getting off the road, they would get it back again. Mr. Strachan had seen one man, fitted with a back leather, lift a tram back on the road by himself. The trams were 6 ft. long, and held from 30 cwt. to two tons. The Chairman thought that the trams were a more perfect piece of machinery than those in this country, to which Mr. Hepplewhite added that the trams ran on springs, and had ball bearings, so that they were actually better than railway wagons; but they must have very nice floors to run on. He was also struck by the coal-cutting machines and the overhead trolleys, though of the opinion that conditions in this country were too unfavourable for the use of such machines. The Chairman said that we in England ought to bestow more care on our tubs. Fuel Economy. Mr. Bramall, in opening the discussion, said that at all the collieries where there was a good deal of water, the amount to be pumped was about the same. Pump- ing took nearly as much fuel as the coal, and he thought they would have to look forward to an increase. The Chairman suggested it would be better to cen- tralise the power; but Mr. Bramall said this could not be done, and remarked that the only way to reduce consumption was to utilise the exhaust steam from the winding engines by turning it into electricity, which could only be done by those who were already pre- pared, machinery being now unobtainable. Patent furnaces had not been a success with him. The Chairman said that for automatic furnaces the fuel had to be broken up to a uniform size. Mr. Hewitt confirmed a remark that the use of washed nuts caused a very great improvement in the fire and the steam, while the ash was very small indeed. This concluded the meeting. GOAL PRODUCTION CONFERENCE. At the request of the Government, the executive of the Mining Association of Great Britain and the executive of the Miners’ Federation of Great Britain (as intimated in our columns last week) will meet in joint conference in London next Tuesday to consider the question of a greater production of coal. COAL WASHING PLANT AT MANOR- P0W1S COLLIERY, STIRLING. At the new colliery at Manor-Powis, not far from Stirling, owned by the Manor-Powis Coal Company Limited, all the plant is of the latest type, and planned for a large output; but special mention may be made of the installation of coal washing plant (fig. 1), designed and fitted up by the Simon-Carves Company, Manchester. The fine coal from the screens is brought to the washery either by the scraper conveyor and delivered into the feed hopper, or delivered directly by a shoot into the feed hopper. From the hoppers the coal is elevated by the feed elevators into their respective washing boxes, and from these it is swilled along a shoot on to the jigging classifying screens (fig. 2), where it is '7! tii