December 17, 1915. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN 1239 larly interesting results. Several clean fragments were heated in a vacuum to 212 degs. Fahr, for 119 hours, and the product was tested at intervals. The samples yielded in the end an average of 10 to 11 volumes of gas, of which in the larger amount 1-75 volumes, or 16 per cent., was methane. The average composition of gas was: Methane, 16-6 per cent.; carbon monoxide, 0-1; carbon dioxide, 0*7; oxygen, 9-4; nitrogen, 73-0. Most of the gas was given off in the first five hours at 86 to 158 degs. Fahr., but the proportion of methane increased steadily after five hours at temperatures of 158 to 197 degs. Fahr., probably because more of the included air had been driven off earlier in the test. How- ever, the proportion of nitrogen increased steadily after 24 hours to the end of the test. The same samples were then powdered and heated in a vacuum for 26 hours at 212 degs. Fahr., a process that liberated less than one-fifth as much additional gas as had been obtained in the first 24 hours in the lump test. This gas contained 17-9 per cent, methane, nearly the pro- portion that was contained in the total volume in the lump test, and nearly three times as much as came off in the last 27 hours in the lump test, showing that the liberation of the methane was greatly furthered by pul- verising the coal. Some heavier hydrocarbons were also liberated from the powdered coal, showing that they are held more tightly. It was also found that different coals showed great diversity as to volume, rate of liberation, and proportions of gaseous constituents. Many determinations have been made of gas content of German coals. A series, by Broockmann, is of interest, as showing especially low oxygen content. The tests were made on coal fragments freed, as far as pos- sible, from air by standing in vacuum for three days. The gases were obtained by heating the coal samples to 212 degs. Fahr, for several days, great precaution being taken to avoid the infiltration of air. The approxi- mate relative volume was 0-1—1-9, the composition being: Methane, 12—96 per cent.; carbon dioxide, 3—91; oxygen, 0—5; nitrogen, 2—67; carbon monoxide, 0—9 per cent. Ghysen gave the results of tests of samples of two Belgian coals from Marcinelle-Nord mine, one series being taken from a depth of 3,100 ft. in No. 12 shaft, and another from the same bed at a depth of 2,920 ft. in No. 11 shaft. There had been several strong outbursts of gas from the bed, one of which occurred at a depth of 2,920 ft., blowing out 95 tons of coal. The two shafts are three-fourths of a mile apart, and are separated by a great fault; the deeper shaft is generally more gaseous than the other. Samples of about 17| lb. each, in frag- ments about 0-6 cu. in. in diameter, were collected every morning, crushed with steel balls for one hour in a pulveriser hermetically tight, and tested twice, at intervals of four hours, in the afternoon. A series of 19 samples from No. 12 shaft yielded gas containing 69-1 to 84-65 per cent, methane (mean, 74 per cent.), with less than 1 per cent, of oxygen and carbon dioxide, the remainder being nitrogen and air. A series of 12 samples from No. 11 shaft yielded gas containing 43-5 to 87-3 per cent, methane. The volume of gas in each test was never less than 1-J- that of the coal. The increase in quantity of gas given off in the four-hour interval between the two tests was inappreciable. The most important feature is the variation in the volume of gas given off under the same conditions by samples taken at the same hour and from the same place. By crushing a sample in two stages of half-an-hour each, and draw- ing off the gas after each stage separately, a greater total volume of gas was collected than after continuous crushing for an hour. For different samples the com- position of the gas -differed greatly, a variation that Ghysen believes was due to irregularities in escape of gas through cracks, and also to differences in original vegetal composition. Gas was also lost in mining, such loss naturally being uneven. It was found, also, that from samples taken in the same vicinity, the volume of gas given off in pulverisation varied from 2| to 5| times that of the coal. Similar tests were made, also, of some samples which had been exposed to air for seven to nine months. In every case they gave off about 1| volumes of gases, but the composition of these was peculiar in that gas from samples from shaft 11 con- tained from 9 to 14-75 per cent, of methane or other combustible gases; the gas from samples from shaft 12 contained only 1-5 to 2-8 per cent. Arnould, in his study of gas outbursts, found that some coal when placed in a receptacle gave off four times its volume in gas, and believed that the amount in the solid coal underground must be greater. Marsilly found that a pressure of 75 lb. to the sq. in. did not prevent the issue of gas from coal samples; and the Austrian Commission found that coal from which gas had been exhausted in a vacuum could not re-absorb as much as it held originally. Coal from the Albert mine at Saarbriicken yielded 2 to 2| volumes of gas. Tests made by Chamberlin of the volume of gas given off by various American coals showed not only the variability in volume and in components, but the varia- tions under different conditions. Under ordinary air pressure the Monongah (West Virginia) coal yielded 0-86 per cent, of its volume of methane when powdered to 30-mesh size, and only half as much at 10-mesh size. When the coal was placed in a vacuum, the yield was practically the same. Two other samples yielded much less. A sample of anthracite from No. 1 mine, at Nanticoke (Pennsylvania), gave off 3-1 volumes of gas in three weeks; during the fourth week a further volume of 0-8, which was nearly pure methane, was given off. The highest proportion of carbon dioxide found was 0-17 per cent, of the total volume of gas liberated. Rate of Escape of Gas from Coal. It has been shown that methane and other gases escape continuously from coal while it lies undisturbed underground, while it is being mined, and also for a long time after it has been mined. The rate of escape in general is variable, but is without known relation to the mechanical or granular condition of the coal. Coal that had lost much gas in mining continued to evolve methane in the laboratory, one sample liberating three- fourths of its volume in two weeks, and one and three- fourths volumes in five months. Various investigations have shown that there is great variation not only in the total and relative volumes of methane given off by coal samples, but in the rate of emanation as well. In general the methane is given off more slowly than the carbon dioxide, oxygen, or nitrogen, sd that in the smaller volume of gases extracted in the later part of the test its percentage increased with some samples. Effect of Crushing. That size of grain is also an important factor, has been shown particularly by Charriberlin, who found the rate of emanation was increased by crushing the coal fine, by the addition of carbon dioxide, and by placing the sample in a vacuum. In his experiments the coal was broken and crushed to coarse powder in an airtight receptacle connected with a vacuum pump. It is believed that little gas is lost in taking the coal sample from the mine and making the laboratory transfer. The crushing, however, opens a large proportion of pores and minute crevices, and thus greatly increases the surface from which the gas is given off. Tests were made with samples under atmospheric pressure as well as in a vacuum. Some samples were pulverised for several hours to ascertain the time factor. A sample from the Monongah mine, West Virginia, was divided into two parts; one part was crushed to 10-mesh and the other to 30-mesh size, each part being tested separately. The results were as follow :— Relative Volumes of Methane from 10 mesh and 30 mesh Samples of Coal. Relative volume of No. methane to coal, of Conditions of test. (----------*-------> test. 30-mesh 10-mesh sample, sample. 1 ... In vacuum nearly an hour.... 0’88 ... 0 33 2 ... In vacuum short time, then in CO2 0’89 ... 0’38 at atmospheric pressure 3 ... In air under atmospheric pressure 0’86 ... 0’41 4 ... In pure CO2 under atmospheric 0’91 ... 0’44 pressure 5 ... In vacuum 3| hours, then in CO2 1'38 ... 0’57 under atmospheric pressure 6 ... In vacuum 4 hours, then in hydro- 1’39 ... 0’53 gen and CO2 under atmospheric pressure The last two experiments show that the gas does not escape rapidly, and that time is an important factor. If the crushing is not delayed, the methane emanation is practically the same, whether coal is crushed in vacuum or under normal atmospheric pressure. The gas con- tinues to escape as time passes. The amount imme- diately liberated also is independent of outside pressure. Tests were made both in a vacuum and under full atmospheric pressure, and several trials were made to ascertain the time factor up to four hours, with the following results :— Volumes and Analyses of Gas from Coal Crushed in Vacuum. Constituent. Methane. Air. ' dioxide. (excess). Per cent. Per cent. Per cent. Per cent. No. of sample. Relative volume of gas to coal. 1 .. o-io .. .. 39’65 .. . 2’90 .. . 48’18 .. 9’27 2 .. .. 0’12 .. .. 40-99 .. . 1’56 . .. 47’48 .. . 10’27 Rate of Escape from Lump Coal. In another test, lumps of coal were placed in a receptacle from which the air was exhausted in about 20 minutes, the diminution of pressure amounting to more than 29 in. The air exhausted in 20 minutes from a vessel containing Monongah coal contained 0-002 volume of methane, whereas coal from the Naomi and the Mansfield mines gave only a trace of methane. A fourth sample from a gaseous part of the Monongah mine gave off 0-003 volume of methane. A sample of lumps of anthracite coal from No. 1 mine, Nanticoke, Pennsylvania, gave off 0-03 volume of methane in 20 minutes, and 1-07 volumes in seven days. Chamberlin made an extended series of tests to ascer- tain the rate of escape of gas from coal samples during a period of six months. The coal was stored in vacuum bottles, and the gas pumped out at intervals for analysis. The volume of gas and rate of escape depended greatly on the size of the fragments. At the end of six months gas was still escaping from lump coal, whereas the liberation of gas from the crushed coal had nearly ceased. Samples of one crushed coal yielded 2-3 to 0-9 volumes of gas, whereas lump samples of the same coal yielded only 0-5 to 0-9 volume of gas. To investigate the volume of gas lost in handling the sample, coal was collected at the face in the mine and placed in cans, which were at once sealed. The gas in the cans was determined a week later, and a month later some of the sample that had been placed in vacuum bottles was tested. Bituminous coal from the Mansfield mine, Carnegie, Pennsylvania, gave off 0-55 volume of gas, exclusive of nitrogen, and gas escaped more rapidly during the first few days. A sample of gaseous anthra- cite, however, showed a nearly uniform rate of escape of methane. Gases other than methane were mainly air, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide. The rate of escape of nitrogen decreased with time, showing that the nitrogen was mainly from residual air that had given up its oxvgen to the coal. Deducting extra nitrogen, the proportion of methane rose as high as 98 per cent, for some samples: but usually it was between 80 and 95 per cent. The methane per- centages were highest in the anthracite sample, which yielded but little carbon dioxide, whereas the bituminous coal from the Mansfield mine contained as much as 13 per cent, of carbon dioxide. Lump coal fresh from some mines continues to evolve gas enough to be lighted in a mine car. Morin cited an instance in which air extracted from the centre of a pile of freshly broken coal weighing three or four tons contained 16 to 26 per cent, of methane. Rate of Escape from Pulverised Coal. In order to compare the rate of escape of gas from finely crushed coal with that from coarse lumps in the test by Chamberlin, samples from other parts of the Monongah mine were crushed to pass through a 10-mesh sieve, and then bottled in vacuum. In general the proportion of carbon dioxide steadily increased, finally reaching 15 per cent, in one sample, and nearly 21 per cent, in the other. The comparison showed that finely crushed coal gives off much more gas than lump coal; emanation starts more rapidly, and the proportion of methane is larger. Comparative Tests with Different Sizes. A series of tests was made by Chamberlin to deter- mine the rate of escape of methane from coals of various kinds, and especially the relative volumes from the same coal in small lumps and in powder. The results showed that methane escapes more freely and in larger volume from crushed coal, but that the supply more slowly emitted by the lumps would in time equal that from the powder. Therefore, the extent to which the “pores” of the coal are opened affects the rate of emission, but not the ultimate volume of the gas liberated, so it is not a matter of volume of gas liberated in a given time, but of liberation of all the gas in suffi- cient time. Chamberlin summarised the conclusions drawn from these results as follow :— (1) Reduction of pressure removes gases from coal slowly—a matter of weeks and months. (2) Finely powdered fresh coal gives off more methane during six months in a vacuum than the same amount of lump coal subjected to the same con- ditions. But, presumably during a much longer period of time, approximately the same volume of gas should be expected to come off from either type of coal. (3) Reduction of pressure for only a few hours, or even a few days, is far less effective in extracting the entrapped gas than crushing the coal, either in a vacuum or under barometric pressure. (4) Crushing coal to a certain degree of fineness yields approximately the same volume of methane, whether the operation is performed in a vacuum or in an atmosphere of air or carbon dioxide. (5) Crushing the coal to the degree of fineness of which the crusher is capable removes only a minor proportion of the free gas stored within the coal, for Monongah coal already crushed either in vacuum or under full atmospheric pressure yielded more methane during two weeks in a vacuum than was liberated during the crushing. The conclusions signify that old coal workings and faces continue to give off gas. (To be continued.) BOOK NOTICES. The South Wales Coal Annual for 1916. Edited by Joseph Davis and C. P. Hailey. 5 J in. x 8Jin. Cardiff: Business Statistics Company Limited. Price, 7s. 6d. net. In this admirable annual the editors, despite the many difficulties created by the war, have again arranged a compendium of information which will prove of great assistance to those engaged in the staple industry of South Wales. The present issue continues its series of interesting statistics relating to the fuel exports, market and average prices, charterings, list of local coal mines and managers, etc., and also contains the text of the new wage agreements and legislation pertaining to the coal mining industry. An account is also included of the progress of local coal firms, such as the Ebbw Vale Steel, Iron and Coal Company Limited, the Newport- Abercarn Coal Company, and the Fernhill Collieries Limited. A Brief Memoir of James Robson. By James Robson. 45 pp. 8| in. x 6| in.; 19 illus. Birmingham : J. Robson, Sandwell-road, Hands worth. This pamphlet describes the part played by the author’s father in the invention and introduction of the two-cycle gas engine. The first engine, constructed in 1857, had a 3|in. cylinder of 6 in. stroke, the charge being exploded at each revolution of the crank. A 3 horse-power horizontal engine was built in 1858-59, and drove a circular saw for nine years, two others of the same type being used on printing machines in North Shields. In 1877 a patent was taken out for a two- cycle engine, the pioneer of the type in which the front end of the piston is used as a pump for dfaiving and compressing the mixture of gas and air, and the back end for the explosion or power stroke. Robson’s other inventions included a gas forging hammer and a gas pump, in which the return stroke of the pump piston is effected by springs compressed during the explosion stroke. He also experimented considerably in connec- tion with a direct-lift aerial machine. The memoir is interesting, as affording yet another instance of British inventiveness in mechanical appliances which have subsequently been adopted and elaborated by people of other nationalities. The author informs us that he will have pleasure in forwarding a copy of the memoir, free of charge, to societies, etc., interested in the subject. The second edition of the Magnet of Commerce, issued by the Great Central Railway, is on the same high level of interest and quality as the first, and contains the latest statistics available at the date of publication.