October 15, 1915. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN 777 Modern American Coal Mining Methods, with Some Comparisons.* By SAMUEL DEAN. The feature which stands out above all others, when comparison is made between coal mining methods in different countries, is the output per man in American mines. A few weeks previous to the war the writer visited mines in Germany, Belgium, and France, and revisited mines in Great Britain, and he again affirms his opinion that the principal reason why the United States of America leads in production per man is because large capacity mine cars are used in American mines. Mr. S. F. Sop with, in discussing Mr. S. H. Cashmore’s paper on “ The Reduction of Working Costs at the Coal Face,”f said that his experience was that fillers earning 6s. 9d. to 7s. a shift considered that they had done a day’s work when they had filled 15 tubs. It is assumed that he referred 'to tubs of a capacity of 10 cwt. each, which equals 7| tons per shift. Mr. Cashmore had shown that only about a-fifth of the filler’s time was actually occupied in filling, nearly the whole of the remainder being spent (or wasted) in topping up, tramming, and in waiting for empties. If Mr. Sop with had used tubs of, say 3J tons capacity, it would only have been necessary for the filler to load two tubs to equal the output of 14 10-cwt. tubs. It is quite reason- able to expect also that, if the filler is not engaged in topping, tramming, or in waiting, he will be filling, and Fig 1.—Side Elevation. --------- J09" -------- Fig 3 —End View CHAIN' CHAIN ROD Figs. 1 to 4.—Steel Mine Cab with Oak Bottom. COUPLING- HOOK OAK 561-inch Gauge. Fig 4.-Rear View OAK .... ROPy <- --- 30"------>' Fig 2.-Plan of Bottom iaai ■m ROD ACROSS CAR *&o' 5 Ol