June 18, 191J. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. 1281 The average value of coal, coke and manu- factured fuel exported from the United Kingdom during May was 17s. 10 3d. per ton, as com- pared with 13s. 8*7d. in May 1914, and 14s., l’,6d. in May 1913. The value during the first five completed months of the present year is 15s 8-2d. per ton as com- pared with 13s. 10;5d. and 13s. 10’6d. respectively in the corresponding periods of 1914 and 1913. Of the total exports of coal during May, the mean value of the large coal exported was 20s. 6-05d.; through-and-through (unscreened), 14s. 7 2d.; and small coal, 15s. 9*7d. The average value of all kinds of coal exported was 17s. 8’7d., an increase of 7’4d. as compared with the previous month. Other- wise divided, it fetched the following :—Steam coal, 18s. 9’4d. ; gas coal, 13s. 7’04d.; anthracite, 19s. 4*7d. ; household, 19s. 4Td. ; other sorts, 14s. 2'7d. The mean value of the coke exported was 22s. 3-Id. per ton, and of the manufactured fuel 19s. 8-3d. per ton. Two papers are down for reading at the general meeting of the North of England Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers, at Newcastle-on-Tyne, to-morrow (Saturday); the first by Mr. H. W. G. Halbaum on “ The Winding Drums of Practice and Theory, with Notes on Factors of Safety and Economy of Winding Popes,” and the second by Mr. C. W. Chater entitled “ Mining in Burma.” On Monday next, before the South Staffordshire and War wick shire Institute of Alining Engineers, at Birmingham, Air. James Lomax will lecture on “The Formation of Coal Seams in the Light of Decent Alicroscopic Investigations.” At a meeting of the Aiming Institute of Scotland at Edinburgh on Saturday last, Mr. Henry Briggs read a paper dealing with rescue brigade systems, and a second paper descriptive of “ An Auxiliary and Outfit for Attachment to Self-contained Bescue Apparatus ” was contributed by Mr. M. McCormick. Air. Alontague (Financial Secretary to the Treasury) stated in the House of Commons on Wednesday that he hoped shortly to introduce a proposal for a taxation of war profits. Next Tuesday an important conference takes place at Newcastle between representatives of the. North- umberland coalowners’ and miners’ associations to consider a suggestion of a Departmental Committee regarding the suspension of the Eight Hours Act. In the House of Commons, on Monday, the Home Secretary said action in the matter of suspending the Act was being considered........................ At Edinburgh, on Monday, the hearing was com- menced in the charge against two Glasgow iron merchants for alleged trading with the enemy by exporting iron ore to Germany. A further conference of members of Parliament considered the question of coal prices on Tuesday, and appointed a certain representation of labour, owners, consumers and ship owners to meet the President of the Board of Trade next week. In reply to a question in the House of Commons, Mr. Kunciman has stated that he does not consider the question of coal supply and prices could be dealt with under the Defence of the Realm Act. Mr. Leonard Llewellyn, general manager of the Cambrian Combine, has accepted an important appointment under the Ministry of Munitions. A special conference of the South AVales Aliners’ Federation on Tuesday emphatically reaffirmed their proposals for a new working agreement. The Scottish Coal Trade Conciliation Board have asked Sir George Ask with to act as neutral chairman in regard to the claim of the miners for a 50 per cent, increase in wages. The statement made by Air. Maximum Runciman in the House of Commons Prices last week with regard to the price of and Profits. eoal "iVas of tke utmost importance. The Board of Trade have approached the leading London merchants and induced them to agree to a limitation of profits on the sale of coal. At present the arrangement. appears to have . been made to cover sales during the summer months, but it is probable that a similar course of action will be prolonged over the much more important period when the householder has to burn coal for heating purposes. The arrangement has been based in all probability on a fixed margin between the price delivered at depot and the retail price to the con- sumer, whether delivered in bulk or by trolley, to cover the merchants’. cost of working and a fair proportion of profit. Now,. looking to the end of the skein, it is obvious that such an arrangement could be of no advantage to the consumer if measures were not taken to fix within reasonable limits the price at which coal could be delivered at the depots. This part of the question naturally resolves itself into two sections, for the cost of transport must be added to the pithead price, and abnormal conditions may affect both of these factors to a material extent. On reading carefully the evidence given before the Retail Coal Prices Committee, it becomes evident that the difficulties of transport have been a much more considerable factor in the advance in price than the Committee in their report seemed to infer. The temporary blocks on the railways, the indifferent running of wagons, as well as the transference to rail of large quantities of fuel and other materials usually conveyed by water, have greatly increased the cost of conveyance, even though the rates of carriage have remained the same. This side of the question, however, can be controlled by the Govern- ment ; it may not be easy to devise a remedy, without a great augmentation of storage facilities, but, if it were purely a question of transport, there would be no necessity to touch either buyer or seller. On the other hand, it is useless to deny that a large proportion of the increased price is comprised in the advanced pit-head price, or that this advance, measured purely on the individual ton, does not include a large margin of profit over and above any increase in the cost of working due to war condi- tions. Further, we are prepared to agree with Mr. Runciman that coal owners “ are not justified in looking upon this as one of the normal good years ”4 the necessity of the public at a time like the present bears little affinity to the demand which usually precedes an advance in price. Under the latter conditions any attempt to limit the supply would properly deserve reprobation, but, whatever faults may lie at the door of the British coalmining industry, it must be acquitted of any charge of ever having attempted to restrict the output on a rising market, and the employers on several occasions have actively combatted conspiracies on the part of the miners to this end, as witness the Welsh “ stop-day ” action. Apart from any moral relation, the industry as a whole has never been in a position to enforce such designs, and it has always seemed to us a weak point in the organisation of the British coal trade that it has never been in a position to control output or prices, in the same sense that the German Kohlen- kontor has been able to regulate the sales of its products ; for history has proved that a wise administration of this character, while it has pre- vented prices from an utter collapse, and the perpetuation of bad trading conditions that are dis- advantageous to seller and buyer alike, has actually checked the development of famine prices that takes place when unbridled competition is extinguished by an inordinate expansion of the demand.. That the British coal trade has never been able to effect any control of prices has been due mainly to the fact that the industry has been conducted, so to speak, in watertight compartments, and more especially to the fact that a large proportion of the output has to be placed in the world’s markets, where it comes in contact with American, German, Belgian, and a number of other coals. Thus, the distinction drawn by Air. Runciman between wheat and coal, that “the price of coal is in no way dependent, or very little dependent, upon the world’s direction outside,” is not accurate, for the price at which coal can be sold in the River Plate or in the Mediterranean has a marked influence upon the pithead. price ; and, indeed, if this were not so, the curtailment of exports to such markets would have little justification.- It is true that the Government have endeavoured to remove this outside factor by closing down the export trade to neutrals, but this was only done long after the causes of the late rise in prices had begun to work, and the trade, even now, cannot in a day be reorganised to fit in with the unusual conditions of a closed market. We have made the above observations mainly with the object of showing that the coal owner does not deserve the opprobrium that has been cast upon him. Let us see exactly what took place in the closing month of last year. Merchants who had lessened their contracts in the height of summer in anticipation of a falling market, were short of coah Consumers, both large and small, became panic- stricken, and some of them selfishly bought greatly in excess of their individual requirements; but it was more difficult than usual to procure supplies on the open market, because the reduction in output had left the collieries with less free coal to meet the normal margin of trade. When first one buyer and then another approached the colliery owner and competed for his supplies of free coal, he could do nothing but accept the best offer. It is important to remember that owing to the increase in cost of working due to enlistment, scarcity of pit wood and materials, taxation, &c., the bulk of the contracted output was being sold at a loss ; but the main point is that, in accordance with the practice of trading, the price of coal could only be fixed by the offers of buyers. There is no organisation to which such matters could be referred, even if the self-effacement of the colliery owner had carried him to this Quixotic extreme. Sir Arthur AIarkham has told us how his patriotic attempt to restrict the selling price only led to the merchants taking an increased profit without any benefit to the consumer. If there is one class of the community that should be il controlled ” above another it is the consumer. At the recent meeting of the Institution of Gas Engineers there was quite a “ breeze ” between the north and south country managers ; the former maintained that it was chiefly due to’ the indiscri- minate rush for coal on the part of the south country managers that the price of gas coal had risen ; the latter retorted that the north-country people had feathered their nest and did not care what happened to their neighbours. There we have, in a microcosm, a true presentation of the case. If the Government be invested with powers to prevent the unwarrant- able holding up of stocks, surely this should apply not only to the merchant or producer, who represents the pivot of a large circle of consumers, but also to those consumers who double their stocks on the first breath of rumour; in the aggregate these hoards may represent a considerable amount of “ withheld ” coal. 1 Under the conditions that have been gradually built up in 'Germany, it would be a matter of no great difficulty for the Government now to deal with the problem at the colliery end, but it would appear to be an almost insuperable task to give the British coal trade a constitution at this hour. The favourite plan is to fix a maximum for certain typical grades of coal, which should not necessarily be unalterable as the stars, but subject to extraneous changes in the cost factor. Thus, taking Yorkshire Silkstone and Haigh Afoor, and Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire house coals, a figure of 15s. at pit has been suggested, which, with the cost of carriage and the 7s 6d. allotted to the merchants, would give about 32s. at the consumer’s door. This estimate was made before the miners obtained their “ war bonus,” and this has been reckoned as the equivalent of Is. 6d. in the selling price'. It is not necessary here to speculate how far this increase in working costs has been induced by the cost of living, and how far by the impression that extravagant profits were being made by someone in the trade. There are two grave objections to the plan set forth above. The first is that it leaves out of count all questions of credit or reputation, and would tend to bring about a reduction in efficiency and quality; for this is the rock upon which nearly all attempts at co-operative trading have split in this country ; the producer who takes a pride in the quality of his product has always declined to pool it in an aggregate,