January 22, 1915. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. 193 Scotland. Gas Corporations and their Coal Supplies—Tramways at Glasgow Harbour. In no part of Scotland have miners suffered so acutely since the outbreak of the war as in the Slamannan district, but it is encouraging to note that a change has set in with the advent of the new year. The Easter Jaw Colliery, which has been idle for about four months, has now restarted and already upwards of 60 miners have found what gives promise of being steady employment. It is also reported that the Jawcraig Colliery, which has been idle for some time, is also to be re-opened soon, while with the starting again of Guardroom Colliery, the outlook for the immediate future is considerably brighter. A roll of honour of men in the Army is being compiled in the Lothians, and up to the present the returns from the several collieries are as follow:—Arniston, 194; Elphin- stone, 83; Niddrie, 328; Ilosewell, 31; Carberry, 101; Preston, 42; Ormiston, 66; Preston grange, 177; W-allyford, 120; Pol ton, 14; House of Mines, 8; Bankston, 64; Wood- hall, 43; Bankpark, 32; Boslin, 64. Figures from two of the largest collieries, Newbattle and Loanhcad, have not yet been obtained, but the numbers are such as will bring the grand total up to 2,000 members. At a general meeting of the governors of George Heriot’s Trust, held in Edinburgh, it was reported that arrange- ments had been completed for the opening of the new mining rescue station, which is to be part of the equipment of the Heriot-Watt College. The station is to be formally opened by Lord Provost Inches on Wednesday, February 24, and Sir Pilchard A. S. Bedmayne, head of the Mining Depart- ment, Home Office, London, will probably give an address. It may be noted that the installation of the new rescue station has been carried through in conjunction with several of ,the colliery owners in the district, with whom the governors have an agreement, and the estimated cost is 41,400. Mr. Michael McCormick, Bescue Station, Kil- marnock, has been appointed instructor at the station, while Mr. Win. A. Smith, 59, Dundas-street, Bonnyrigg, pre- sently employed by the Arniston Coal Company, has been chosen as assistant. Dundee Gas Committee of the Town Council have had under consideration a difficulty which has arisen over the contract supplies. It was reported that a Glasgow firm, who had a large contract pending with the Corporation, had written advising that steps should be taken by the large, corporations in Scotland to ask the Government to suspend the statutes dealing with miners’ hours and wages, with a view to receiving an adequate supply of coal. The letter further stated that the output was now reduced 30 per cent, compared with the normal output, and there were difficulties in the way of transport. In the course of the discussion it was stated that representatives of other large corporations had indicated their willingness to hold a conference on the subject, and the meeting instructed the convener and manager to .assist in doing what they could to have this conference held without delay, and it was further suggested that the War Office should be approached with a view to having the labour supply of the mines preserved. Bailie Barnes said notice should also be taken that the miners were not working a full week, and a representation should be made to them that they had a patriotic duty to perform. The coal owners of Scotland met in Glasgow on the 13th inst., to consider the provisional arrangement made with the Clyde Trustees in respect of the extra charges for the use of the tramways at Glasgow Harbour. The agreement provides that from September 20 last shippers of coal shall pay |d. per ton for the use of the tramways in the quays of Queen’s Dock, Prince’s Dock, and Bothesay Dock, and |d. per ton for the use of those at the General Terminus Quay. It was agreed unanimously to accept the proposals. The reason for the differentiation is that the cranes and capstans at the latter place are the property of the Caledonian Bail- way Company, while the others are the property of the Clyde Trustees. TRADE ARID THE WAR. The Reinhard Patent : A Third Application—The Govern- ment Dye Scheme—The Shortage of Shipping—Relief Measures—Trading with the Enemy. In the Patents Court, on Monday, Messrs. Stewarts and Lloyds Limited, Birmingham, applied for a licence under a German patent, in the name of Beinhard, to manufacture during the term of the war an adjustable steel pit prop. Messrs. Edwin Lewis and Sons, tube manufacturers, of Wolverhampton, opposed the application. The latter pro- duced a notification from the Board of Trade that a licence' was to be issued to them to manufacture this pit prop. Mr. Mills, of The Manor, Willenhall, had also been given a- licence to manufacture. For Messrs. Edwin Lewis and Sons it was urged that they were earlier in the field for this patent,, besides being the oldest tube manufacturers in the country.. They offered the suggestion that the applicants should be limited to Scotland as their area of supply. For Messrs. Stewarts and Lloyds, Mr. E. J. Fox replied that his clients might as well be given a monopoly to supply the coal mines of the Sahara desert. It was explained that Mr. Beinhard, of Birmingham, a brother of the patentee, and now interned in . this country, approached the applicants in June with a view to their manufacturing these props for England,, but the war put an end to those negotiations. Applicants,, who had already held orders for these props, employed 15,000 hands, had works in Scotland and Staffordshire, and. had a capital of between 4 and 5 millions. They already made a simpler steel prop of their own. They would, consent to. pay a royalty of 5 per cent. The Controller said he would report to the Board of Trade. With reference to the aniline dye scheme proposed by the Government, conferences on the subject have now been, held at the Board of Trade to further the scheme. A deadlock has arisen regarding the guarantees of business at the end of the war. The Association of Chambers of Commerce has passed the following resolution:— “That the proposed scheme of a national company, assisted by Government money, to develop the coal tar colour industry in the United Kingdom would, in the opinion of the council of the Association of Chambers of Commerce of the United Kingdom, not meet the difficulties of the situation, but- would stifle competition and establish a monopoly. That the council is of the opinion that a substantial import duty on coal tar colours should be imposed for some years after the close of the war. If this be granted, the present manufacturers would largely extend their operations, other manufacturers —British and foreign—would establish works, and there would be a much-increased output. The competition within the United Kingdom would insure the consumers against excessive prices, and be an incentive to economical and efficient manufacture?"—The council of the London Chamber of Commerce have also considered the matter, and have adopted a resolution to the effect that, as a means of meeting a national emergency, a guarantee of adequate tariff protection for at least 10 years after the termination of the war should be given.—At a special meeting of the Bradford Dyers" Association Limited, on Monday, it was decided to forward a letter on the question to Sir William Blender, as representing the Board of Trade. The letter states that the circumstances call for Government aid in a more effective form than that of merely lenders, such aid may, says the letter, be applied by protective tariffs, grants in aid, or lending schemes, and suggests that the former would be probably most effective. Between the other two courses a system of grants in aid is preferred, and it is suggested that a commission should be appointed to administer a fund on the lines suggested, and that an. immediate grant of 4500,000 should be made. Under this method it is also suggested that the Government should for 10 years make an annual grant of equal amount to that voluntarily raised by trades interested.—It is now possible to state authorita- tively, says The Times, that the Government have no intention whatever of relaxing their efforts to establish a national dye industry.—The committee appointed by the users of dyes met at the Board of Trade on Wednesday. In view of the present attitude of their respective companies towards the committee’s scheme, Mr. Lennox B. Lee, of the Calico Printers" Association Limited, and Mr. Milton S. Sharp, of the Bradford Dyers’ Association Limited, with- drew from the committee. The remaining members of the committee were unanimously of opinion that the proposals of the Bradford Dyers’ Association Limited were impracti- cable. The committee will be enlarged, and will proceed immediately to the preparation of a scheme on a modified financial scale which, while not departing from the general lines originally laid down, will in several respects be more advantageous to the subscribers to the proposed company. A report on the overseas trade of theJJnited Kingdom, with special reference to the present congestion of traffic at the ports, has been presented to the Liverpool Steamship Owners" Association. This report, signed by Sir Norman Hill, throws valuable light on the conditions which are contributing to raise freights. The report begins with a comparative statement of the value of the imports for the five months August to December in 1913 and 1914. These .figures summarised show that for the oversea trade of the United Kingdom the volume of imports has fallen 21 per cent., whilst the shipping tonnage carrying those imports has decreased by 29 per cent., and that so far as the over- sea trade of Liverpool is concerned the volume of imports has fallen by 5 per cent, and of exports by 20 per cent., whilst the shipping tonnage entered and cleared has ■decreased by 3 per cent, inwards and 12 per cent, outwards. An examination of the oversea trade of other nations shows ;a very similar position. There have been withdrawn the ships of Germany, Austria, and Hungary, which represent about 14 per cent, of the world’s shipping. On the other hand, the oversea trade of those countries and of Belgium (which together represented in normal times about 22 per ■cent, of the trade of the world) has vanished, and the trade of the Baltic and of the Black Sea has almost ceased to exist. The trade of some of the neutral countries has increased, but it is probable that the oversea trade of the world has suffered not less than the oversea trade of the United Kingdom, that is to the extent of about 30 per ■ cent. The number of British vessels available for oversea trade has been seriously diminished by the requirements of the Admiralty, who have taken up about 25 per cent, of the ships. Sir Norman says that there is nothing in the above figures to account for the congestion of the ports. The main cause is the shortage of labour. He concluded by saying that “ If the block in the ports cannot be removed, freights and prices must go on rising until we are faced with the risk of actual shortage in our supplies of food and raAv material.” It is now clear that the machinery set up by the Govern- ment for dealing with distress due to the war is not at present required. It is therefore suggested that it should be scrapped, but Ministers as a body are said to agree with the Labour members, that all machinery should be kept in readiness for dealing with the critical period that will follow the war. Over one million men have been taken out of industrial pursuits, and at least another million have been diverted to occupations necessary for carrying on the struggle. When the war ends most of these men must be re-absorbed by the industries that flourish most in times of peace. Therefore, the Government will retain intact for the present all the machinery called into existence, and at the same time the Board of Trade officials will keep careful watch on the condition and possibilities of industry. A telegram from Panama says that friendly notes of protest have been despatched to the British Minister Besident, Mr. Mallet, and also to the Japanese Embassy at Washington, against the alleged violation of neutrality by the colliers “Kirnwood” and “ Boddam” last month, while Japanese and British warships were in the Panama waters. The Amsterdam Telegraaf learns from reliable sources That the Germans have for some weeks given work to 40,000 miners in the collieries at Mons, Liege and Charleroi, and that they are exporting the coal to Germany. The work- men earn 2 marks daily. Armed German guards are placed in the mines. At Newcastle, on Wednesday of last week, Prof. H. M- Hallsworth, before the Newcastle Economic Society, dealt- with the trade prospects after the war had ended. He thought it was a mistake to think that at the close of the war Germany would cease to count commercially. He saw no reason to reverse free trade or private enterprise in industry. There were the new markets opened to us by the stoppage of exports from Europe, and particularly from Germany, to consider, and the extent to whieh these might compensate us for the loss of European markets. Secondly, there was the possibility that organised effort might secure for us a larger measure of trade in world markets. In these directions manufacturers had a unique opportunity, their rivals being shut off from the markets of the world—a state not likely to recur for another generation. Our German competitors possessed no weapon we do not possess or may not acquire. The six characteristics Germany employed were: (1) The importance attached to research and the study of theory and principles of business ; (2) attention to detail and willingness to study tastes of customers ; (3) improved salesmanship; (4) better organisation of industries as a whole ; (5) financial backing of industrial undertakings by the banks; and (6) more support by the State of commercial and industrial enterprise. Lie thought much could be gained by an improvement in the training and appointment of consuls. A specially constituted Court of Appeal, consisting of the Lord Chief Justice, the Master of the Bolls, and Lords Justices Buckley, Swinfen Eady, Phillimore, and Pickford, gave judgment on Tuesday in several cases, argued before them in December last, which raised questions as to the legal position of alien enemies in this country. The cases were those of Porter v. Freundenberg ; Krelinger v. S. Samuel and Bosenfeld ; in re Merten’s Patent ; the Continental Tyre and Bubber Company (Great Britain) Limited v. Daimler Company Limited; and the Continental Tyre Company v. Thomas Tilling Limited. The Lord Chief Justice read a judgment referring to the first three cases. He said the main questions were, firstly, the capacity of alien enemies to sue in the King’s Courts ; secondly, their liability to be sued ; thirdly, their capacity to appeal to the Appeal Courts ; and, generally, their right to appear and to be heard in the King’s Courts. The law was firmly established in 1799 that one of the consequences of Avar was an absolute interdiction of all commercial intercourse or correspondence by British subjects with the inhabitants of a hostile country, except by permission of the Sovereign. A. declaration of Avar imported a prohibition of all commerce and correspondence with the inhabitants of the enemy’s country, and that such intercourse Avas illegal. It Avas clear law that the test of “ alien enemy ” for the purposes of this matter Avas not the nationality but the place of carrying on business that Avas important. Alien enemies had no civil rights or privileges, unless they were here under the protection of, and by permission of, the CroAvn. The next point to consider Avas Avhether alien enemies Avere liable to be sued in British Courts during the Avar. To say that an alien enemy could not be sued during Avar Avould be to convert that Avhich during the Avar Avas a disability into a relief of the enemy from the discharge of his liability to British subjects. Once the conclusion Avas reached that an alien enemy could be sued, it folloAved that he might appear, might be heard in his oAvn defence, and might take all proper steps necessary for his case. Once he Avas sued, he Avas equally entitled to every opportunity of challenging the correctness of the judge of first instance as any other defendant. The Court, having decided that alien enemies could be sued, had to decide how effective notice of the proceedings could be given to the alien enemy Avho was sued. They thought the proper order to make Avas to give leave to make substituted service, and they referred the first Iavo cases to Chambers as to the proper modes and methods of effecting substituted service. The Bule Committee might think it necessary to frame further rules to meet the cases. In the third case, the appellants Avere admittedly alien enemies, and they contended that their appeal could not be heard during the war. Judgment Avas given against them before the war, but it was suspended pending appeal, and it was to their advantage that the appeal should be delayed. The appellants, however, Avere entitled to appear (they being originally sued, and being in the position of defendants), and Avere entitled to appeal during the Avar. It Avas, however, in the discretion of the Court before Avhom the appeal came, to postpone the hearing for other reasons. The actions by the Continental Tyre Company Avere brought to determine Avhether during the war payment of a debt could be enforced by a company of which all the directors and shareholders Avere alien enemies. Mr. Justice Scrutton and Mr. Justice Lush had decided in favour of the company, and the present appeals Avere against both judgments. The fallacy of the appellants’ contention Avas that the constitution of the company could not be disregarded. A company formed and registered under the Companies’ Act in England had a real existence, and Avas a legal entity, entirely separate and distinct from the shareholders, and therefore payment to the company Avas not payment to alien enemies. In the opinion of the majority of the Court, both the appeals must be dismissed. Lord Justice Buckley regretted that he was unable to ■concur in the decision. The plaintiff company, as an artificial legal entity, had no independent poAver of motion. Lt Avas moved by its German corporators ; it was German in fact, and British in form. For these reasons, he was of opinion that the plaintiff company stood for the present purpose in the position of an alien enemy, and could not sue. He thought the appeals should be alloAved. The Lord Chief Justice said the result Avas that both appeals Avould be dismissed, with costs. The trial Avas concluded before Mr. Justice BoAvlatt at the Old Bailey, on Wednesday, of John Frederick Drug- horn, 50, shipowner, avIio pleaded not guilty to an indict- ment charging him Avith trading Avith the enemy. The case for the prosecution Avas that defendant, who Avas governing director of Frederick Drughorn Limited, a company having its offices at Gracechurch-street, E.C., with a branch at Botterdam, in September last entered into a neAv commercial agreement Avith a SAvedish company, Avhich, it Avas alleged,-was for the benefit of the enemy, inasmuch as through the Botterdam branch lighters Avould be engaged to carry iron ore into Germany to the Bhine steehvorks. The prosecution alleged that to get over the difficulties of the war and to enable him to carry out his obligations Avith the SAvedish firm, defendant revived a company called the Drughorn Transport Company. It Avas stated that the firm had contracts to carry over a million tons of iron ore into Germany at the time the Avar broke out. The defendant, giving evidence, said he Avas born in Holland, but had become a naturalised subject in 1912. At the outbreak of Avar he had twenty-four Bhine tugs seized by Germany. He had written a letter to the Board of Trade, in Avhich he asked Avhether the Botterdam branch would be acting disloyally in discharging and tran- shipping a cargo of iron ore from SAveden. The letter added : “ As regards the chartering of tonnage for trans- portation to ultimate destination, this Avould in the present instance most likely be attended to by a Dutch company, in Avhich, however, our Botterdam branch is interested.” The Dutch company referred to Avas the Drughorn Transport Company. The defendant Avas found guilty and ordered to pay the costs.