316 THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. FbBKUAKY 6, 1911. shire it was necessary and he encouraged the managers to report every case. In North Staffordshire the gobs as a rule were full of gas, whereas in South Staffordshire they were not. In the Black Country there were scores of fires loaded out which never gave rise to serious trouble, but in North Staffordshire the loading out was a very different thing. If all these slight heatings were reported to the inspector, it must follow that they must either all be investigated, or he must use his discretion as to how far his staff can undertake the work. If they were to follow up all the slight heatings in South Staffordshire the whole staff would be occupied on nothing else. But, on the other hand, if it was left to the inspector on the reports of gob fires that were sent to him, he might in some cases overlook what might be a very serious fire. He was not prepared without a good deal of thought to suggest a regulation. Regulations were rather dangerous things to frame, and one did not like to commit oneself to exact phraseology. Asked whether he would approve of a regulation being made that all the gassy and dusty mines should be stone- dusted, witness said he thought that would be rather too drastic. In many of them shotfiring was not permitted, or only permitted under very strict regulations, and to require the whole mine to be stonedusted would be drastic. Many of them ran for years without a gob fire. In some few cases they were stonedusting systematically, but he could not say it was general throughout the district. Personally, he would rather welcome a rule requiring stonedusting over every dry and dusty mine road. He was only thinking of the objection the owners might consider; but even from their point of view a regulation that there should be a zone of not less than 120 yards in every direction round the fire should be adopted. As to the nature of indications that should dictatestonedusting, he did not think the matter could be dealt with by merely taking thermometer readings, because it occasionally happened that accumulations of rubbish containing carbonaceous matter heated without being on fire. Therefore, one would require to have some definition of what was the smallest indication bf fire, and witness could not quite see how any regulation could be framed which would require a manager to report every indication of fire. The question of temperature presented another difficulty. They might have a very wide range of normal tempera- ture in a mine. In mines in North Staffordshire one part of the mine was perhaps 70 degs., and another part of it would go up to 90 degs. A standard of 120 degs. would not be unreasonable so far as tempera- ture was concerned, but it would be unreasonable in another way. Take two cases—one in a bord-and-pillar working at Hamstead, for instance. It frequently occurs there that a very slight gob stink is detected. There is no apparent heat; but they cut ifito the coal at a point whence the gob stink seems to issue 1 ft., or it may be 3 ft., in the coal, and get a crack running parallel with the road, and that crack is full of live fire, red hot; but there is no indication of increase of temperature outside. In the rule as framed, the manager would have to report it as soon as they got the fire, but he would neglect to report it altogether simply from the indication of gob stink. Then, again, take the case of longwall working where there was a fire in a pack. If it is near the intake roadway, the temperature in the roadway may rise. On the other hand, they may redd through the pack for 3 or 4 yards and get a live fire; but in this case the temperature in the roadway may afford no indication that a fire is there. Mr. Rigby suggested the words “ fire, or grounds to suspect a fire by reason of gob stink, or otherwise,” and which witness thought would pretty well cover it. Withdrawal of Workmen. With regard to withdrawing men, witness said that if a general regulation were laid down that no men were to be permitted to enter a mine where a fire had been stopped off or was being filled out, that would practically mean the closing of the North Staffordshire district and the whole of the Black Country. In North Staffordshire witness thought there was more danger present to-day in the working of the mines than there had been in past years. In past years gob fires were chiefly in the more highly inclined seams, and the practice was adopted in those highly inclined seams of flooding the gob with gas. In a very inclined seam that was a comparatively safe proceeding ; but now they were working under practi- cally the same method in seams much less highly inclined. In a thick seam with an inclination such as at Jammage, a seam 20 ft. thick, rising at the seat of explosion about 1 in 5, it followed that they had a zone in their broken work stretching from the working face back for a distance of possibly at least 50 ft. which was not open to inspection, which was overlaid by gas, and in which a gob fire might develop at any moment. There was no possible means of getting in to inspect it either for gas or for gob fires. The gob stink from such a fire might rise into the gob behind. The smell might not come out into the accessible portion. The higher temperature, owing to the greater, depth, added to that danger to some extent. During the process of stopping off, so far as witness’s experience had gone, the men were stopped in the whole of the pit. In some cases there was very little open gob; in other cases there was a great deal of open gob; and if there was any reason to believe that that open gob was left charged with gas, he would certainly deprecate the men working in any part, unless it was stonedusted, until the stoppings had been put in and had been there, say, a week. If the roads had been stonedusted in such a way as to render the propagation of a coaldust explosion impossible, he should say no. In most cases he should prefer the immediate introduction of stoppings, and withdraw the men altogether without wasting time over stone-dusting. In some cases the time the stonedusting would take would produce an explosion. That was why, as an inspector, he would welcome a regulation that all roads should be systematically stonedusted. In some mines it would be a hardship—in old mines where the roads were already of enormous length, and where the area of coal to be exhausted was comparatively limited. In North Staffordshire the coal might be worked in advance, but the whole of the seam was not taken out in the thicker seams. It was ripped down in the road- ways ; but very often in some of the seams there was 3 to 4 feet of coal left on above the packs. That came down in the wastes and was got out as far as they could, but there was a very large quantity of carbonaceous matter, coal or coal shale, left in the gob. Continuous Working. Answering Sir Arthur Markham, witness said con- tinuous working was an important factor, because even settlement tended to prevent excessive falls of roof in certain parts of the goaf. But so far as fires were con- cerned, his experience in Scotland was that the chief danger of irregular working was that the roof cut along the coal face and closed there. In the Dysart seam, to which Mr. Robinson referred, there was coal left on the roof, and if the faces were allowed to stand the roof cut along the face, sat down, and a lot of coal was buried, and that almost invariably got on fire unless it was got out at once before it fired. In many cases it could not be got out readily, and they cut in at the gate end and won it afresh, leaving in many cases a thin rib of coal between the fall and the new cutting. That thin rib of coal crushed under the roof weight and very often fired ; but the fires from irregular working occurred much more frequently at the face, or in the neighbourhood of the face, than back-bye in the gob. The settlement of the roof tended to consolidate the gob ; a fresh gob would not fire so readily as a gob which was probably some months old. If the face was kept constantly advancing the settlement of the roof tightened the gob and prevented the air leaking through it before it got old enough to oxidise sufficiently to get on fire. If, on the other hand, the face was stopped for any consider- able time, they had a certain zone there—a strip along the face—where the gob is not sufficiently solid to prevent air getting in through it, and that was where it fired. There was sufficient air going through to oxidise the coal and fire it, but not sufficient to carry away the heat that was generated. He was now speaking entirely of flat mines. The very same thing applied to the deep and shallow coals in South Staffordshire. If the face was allowed to stand for any long period they very often had fires breaking out, and nearly always within a short distance of the face. Where they have a liability to gob fires, as a rule, during a strike they had men constantly travelling through the pit watching for any indication of a gob fire and dealing with it as it arose. The most likely case he knew of for gob fires to break out quickly was Hamstead. There during the miners’ strike, oddly enough, they had rather below than above their average of gob fires. But it was very injudicious to rest one’s opinions upon a single case. At Hamstead their method of working was entirely different to that which obtained in other places. In some of the works they prepared for the eventuality of fires by closing up and putting stoppings. In a seam which is liable to gob fires the seam ought to be so laid out and so worked that stoppings can be put in readily; otherwise the system is defective. The Dangers of Gob Fires. In answer to Mr. Smith, witness said that he thought they would find, if they analysed the figures, that almost all those killed in North Staffordshire had really been killed by explosions following upon gob fires. In South Staffordshire the risk was that of poisoning from the gases because of incomplete combustion. There was very little risk of explosion there. Mr. Johnstone said he did not know any cases in his district where reporting would have improved matters. Witness said it was very difficult to define the normal state of temperature in a mine. In a large mine he should like to see the temperature kept below 80 degs. But in certain parts of some North Staffordshire mines the temperature was constantly a good bit above 80, and up to 90 and 92 had been actually tested, and 92 was normal in that mine or in that part of the mine, whereas in another part of the same mine the normal temperature was 75. That was a mine 900 yards deep. Replying to Mr. Smith, witness said the period in which a place through standing would become dangerous, depended very largely upon the depth of the workings, to some extent upon inclination, and to a greater extent still upon the nature of the roof. Some places would close in a week; others might stand open for three months. Taking the case in which an inspector saw fire coming from a pack, witness said that if he had any means of knowing that the explosion, such as it was, was due to the ignition of a small accumulation in a comparatively small cavity—a flash of light through a pack 20 yards thick would not alarm him much if there was no gas or dust in the air which was coming from where that flash was coming out. But, on the other hand, if be had no means of knowing the condition of the gob, if it were against a fault where there might be a very large cavity, the roof having fallen out, he would certainly not have the men working there if there were a flame flashing through the pack. Of course, there are many pits which are continually giving off gas, but in which the percentage of gas in the travelling airway never approaches the ignition point. If he saw, in any mine that he had any connection with as inspector or manager, a flame flashing through the pack into an air-course carrying 4 per cent, of gas, he would have every man out of that pit as fast as he could. Mr. Johnstone said that where there was no gas and no dust, or, in other words, where there was no risk of explosion, he would content himself with taking means to prevent leakage of air from the gob passing the men on the return side. It would depend very largely on the nature of the atmosphere that was coming off. He had seen gob-fires dealt with where the atmosphere coming off was quite breathable on account of the fresh air coming in. In other cases it was so offensive that men could not work there without using an apparatus. As to the extent of stonedusting witness said if the seam in which the explosion originated was isolated by a long cross-measure drift, and that crut was wet, then he would not require the dusting of the non-gassy and non-dusty seam, because he would depend on the crut arresting any explosion that might occur in the dusty seam. Flashes through the Pack. With.reference to the point raised in regard to flame coming through the pack, and the dilution of the gas, witness said he thought the highest percentage of gas he had encountered under such circumstances was 17. If it had got to 2, he would have asked for the workmen to be withdrawn. Of course, the Coal Mines Act required 2J. He was referring to where the gas in the gob was igniting, and the air being practically clear there was no vitiated air going on to the fire. So that the fire was leaking into practically an innocent and innocuous atmosphere, and there were no cavities. He did not explain to Mr. Smith, as he ought to have done, with regard to this case, that not only was that gob packed tight, but between that gob and the next gate, 40 yards on the other side, there was also a tight gob; there was no waste. Reducing Temperature. Sir Arthur Markham interrogated witness on the subject of temperature. He said if the natural tem- perature of the strata was 92 degs., he would reduce that temperature by passing large volumes of wind through the mine. If there was a large volume of air passing along the gateway in a mine, and that volume of air was passing sufficiently slowly to allow it to take up heat from the strata, it would heat up the air to the tempera- ture of the strata. But if, on the other hand, the air- course was not sufficiently long and the air was not kept sufficiently long in contact with the strata, it would not heat up to that point, and as it robbed the strata of its heat, the temperature of the air would be less rapidly affected. . Sir Arthur said he had had some experiments made on this question, and found after the air had travelled a thousand yards into a mine they could pass what volumes they liked, but the temperature of the air came up to the normal temperature of the mine. The experi- ments extended over five or six years, and there was gradual cooling. They found the greater variation with a strong roof and where it used to stand up for a very considerable distance. Then when they had heavy waste, the heat in the working place for a time was very high. Witness observed that if the roof stood up they would have a very large area and consequently a very low velocity, whereas, if the roof came down, they would have an enormous crushing of the coal and therefore a very rapid oxidation. He did not know which would account for the quick rise in temperature at the face. It was, in his opinion, practicable for the normal temperature of the mine at the working face, which was 92 degs., to be reduced by ventilation. It would not be cooled down, perhaps, very rapidly, but as the cold air was continuing for a long period to blow through it, it would gradually rob the strata of its natural heat and cooled it down. That would not take place in the working places in the mine where they were stripping a new face all the time. If they carried the cold air they gradually cool the main intake to a point constantly extending inwards. Then on the actual working face they were constantly exposing a fresh surface, and the cooling again would not be so manifest. But as the face advanced, the extent of the cooled airway would extend proportionately. It was a problem that was causing a great deal of attention now among mining engineers as to what should be done with the deeper workings, because their workings now were nothing like so deep as they probably would be 20 years hence. It was a very serious problem, and he did not see how it was going to be dealt with otherwise than by improved ventilation. In a large open area, the velocity of the air was very low and its cooling effect was very little. The physio- logical fact was perfectly well known that if the air was moving, although not at all of a cool temperature, it had a cooling effect. The cooling effect of the air upon the body was simply due to the evaporation of the perspiration on the body. If the air was moving, that evaporation went on more rapidly, and they had a sense of coolness, though the thermometer would tell them it was not 1 deg. cooler. Now the more rapidly the air was moving along the working face, the less would the workmen feel heat.—Sir Arthur Markham : Yes; but the more liability you will have to gob fires, because you will have the wind drawing through the packs. Timber a Danger. Passing on to another question, Mr. Johnstone said he had found that timber had been a prevalent cause of fires, and for two reasons ; one was that timber gave off an inflammable gas at a lower temperature than did coal, and the gas it gave off was ignitable at a lower temperature. Then, again, when the props were left in and the roofs did not subside, as had been pointed out by a previous witness, the prop standing there, even if broken, formed a pipe. The fact of the prop being there, surrounded with gob, meant that the gob did not pack itself so closely round about the prop as it would if there were no prop there. It prevented equal settle- ment and left interstices in the immediate vicinity of the prop. As the prop heated, that set up a current, and there was more rapid diffusion of the gases. He thought all colliery managers as a rule realised the point, they were constantly impressing it on the men, and an effort is made to withdraw all the timber. Some man- agers maintained that all their timber was withdrawn, but witness doubted whether in any case that was