February 6, 1914. THE COLLIERY GUARDIAN. 307 Second Edition, Revised. In Crown8vo. Handsome Cloth. With nearly 300 Illustrations. Price 7s. 6d. net. THE ELEMENTS OF MINING AND QUARRYING. An Introductory Text-Book for Mining Students. By Sir C. LE NEVE FOSTER, D.Sc., F.R.S. Revised by Prof. S. H. Cox, A.R.S.M., &c. “A remarkably clear survey of the whole field of mining operations.”— Engineer. “Rarely does it fall to the lot of a reviewer to have to record such unqualified praise as this book deserves. . . . The profession generally have every reason to be grateful to Sir C. Le Neve Foster for having enriched educational literature with so admirable an Third Edition, Revised. In Crown 8vo. Handsome Cloth. 3s 6d. ELEMENTARY COALMINING: For the use of Students, Miners, and others preparing for Examinations. By GEORGE L. KERR, M.E., M.Inst.M.E. “An abundance of information conveyed in a popular and attractive form. . . . Will be of great use to all who are in any way interested in coal mining.’’—Scottish Critic. LONDON: CHARLES GR1FFIH & CO. LTD., Exeter St., Strand. TOBES & Fl s TINGS, ikon and steel. Tubes for Gas, Water, Steam, and Compressed Air. Electric Tramway Poles, Pit Props, High Pressure Steam Mains, &o. JOHN SPENCER LTD,, Globe Tube Works, Wbdnesbury J. W. BAIRD AND COMPANY PITWOOD IMPORTERS, WEST HARTLEPOOL, YEARLY CONTRACTS ENTERED INTO WITH COLLIERIES. OSBECK & COMPANY LIMITED, PIT-TIMBER MERCHANTS, NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE. SUPPLY ALL KINDS OF COLLIERY TIMBER, TELEGBA3iIS—" OSBEOKBj NeW0ASTLE-ON-TYH2.” For other Miscellaneous Advertisements see Last Whit* Page. AND Journal ol the Coal and Iron Trades. Joint Editors— J. V. ELSDEN, D.Sc. (Lond.), F.G.S. HUBERT GREENWELL, F.S.S. LONDON, FRIDAY. FEBRUARY 6. 1914. The London coal trade has lost a good deal of its vigour, and the return to milder weather has also influenced the public orders considerably. Colliery quotations are still uncertain. 'No official records are published yet, but it is anticipated that lower prices will be issued by the close of the week. The prompt markets on the Tyne and Wear are rather quiet. The demand for house coal in Lancashire is easier consequent upon milder weather. In York- shire and Derbyshire business is fairly satisfactory, especially in the latter. At Cardiff little change is reported, but prospects of improvement are favour- able. The activity of the Scottish coal trade has been maintained. A special conference of the South Wales Miners’ Dederation was held at Cardiff, on Monday and Tuesday, when several recommendations were agreed to with a view to the amendment of the Coal Mines. Act, in order to secure additional safety in mines. The Home Office enquiry into the Senghenydd explosion was resumed on Friday last. On the previous day experiments were carried out at New Tredegar with a view to testing whether sparks emanating from electric wires might have been the cause of the disaster. It is understood that the experiments point to the conclusion that the voltage at Senghenydd was not high enough to cause sparks sufficient to account for the explosion. At the enquiry itself several of the under officials have been under examination during the week. An explosion caused by firedamp took place on Friday last in a mine at Achenbach, near Brombauer, Westphalia. The death roll has been officially announced in the Beichstag'as being 25. A general meeting of the North Staffordshire Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers was held at Stoke on Monday, 2nd inst. A paper on electricity in mines was read by Mr. Robert Nelson, in which he discussed the advantages of the three- phase alternating system over the continuous-current system. A deputation from the Miners’ Federation of Great Britain was received by the Prime Minister on Tuesday on the question of the continuation of the Coal Mines (Minimum Wage) Act, which terminates in April 1915. The chief desire" bf the Federation was to secure the inclusion of surface workers in the Act, but upon this point Mr. Asquith was unable to give satisfaction. The Home Secretary on Wednesday received a deputation from the Miners’ Federation of Great Britain on the subject of inspection of mines. On behalf of the men Mr. W. Brace, M.P., put forward a scheme for the appointment of a staff of inspectors selected by the workmen but paid by the State. Mr. McKenna, in reply, said he thought greater safety would be got from an extension of the present system rather than by the new scheme. The Minimum Wage Board for the Lancashire and Cheshire area sat at Manchester, on Thursday, to consider the application of the men for certain changes to be made in the local award. The question of the surface worker was also under discussion ; an offer of the employers-of a minimum of 3s. 4d. per day for adult workmen was refused. A meeting of the Manchester and Geological and Mining Society will be held on Tuesday next, at Manchester, when Mr. Wm. Clifford will read a paper dealing with the reversing of main air-currents in coalmines. The deputation from the Miners’ The Joiners Federation that waited upon the and the Prime Minister on Tuesday, urging Kinimum certain amendments in the Minimum Wafe« Wage Act, got very little satisfaction. Indeed, the alacrity with which Mr. Asquith discerned the weak points in the miners’ case was remarkable. Epitomised, the demands were that surfacemen should come under the Act; that all conditions as to age and regularity of employment should be barred; that the minimum wage of colliers should be ascertained with- reference to one week’s earnings only; that in all cases of dispute the onus of proof should be placed upon the employer; and that the minimum wage for each grade should be raised by 9d. per day. Taking the last first, Mr. Asquith quickly got to grips. “Why ninepence?” he asked, thus com- pelling Mr. Hartshorn, who spoke for the Welsh miners, to admit, in so many words, that the object was to resuscitate the Federation schedule put forward when the Act was passed. The Premier refused to listen to any suggestion of this kind, the impracticability of which cannot fail to impress him both as a lawyer and a practised politician. Kates of wages are as transitory as other conditions of living, and to burden Parliament, already overloaded with parochial affairs, with the meticulous fixation of wages, is just as uneconomical as it is unbusiness- like. It is difficult enough in such matters to give the arbitrator a true knowledge of the facts, and we confess that we are rather surprised that the miners’ leaders should choose to surrender their case entirely to the mercy of so ignorant and heterogeneous a body as the House of Commons—unless it be that they entertain hopes that political opportunism may work in their favour, to the exclusion of all equitable considerations ; and that they claim to be the only party entitled to state a case for the decision of Parliament. In regard to the question of the surfacemen, the Federation have got themselves into a tangle. Candidly, we believe that the lords of the under- ground world care little about the men on the surface ; unfortunately, the latter, at the close of the strike in 1912, made themselves so unpleasant that the Federation were compelled, for ecumenical reasons, to espouse their cause. As Mr. Asquith pointed out, the Act originated in a particular and specific grievance—namely, the grievance of the underground workers in regard to abnormal places. Whatever may have been the real motive, that undoubtedly was the ostensible grievance, and the one which Parliament set itself to remedy. The surfacemen, on this basis, have no more claim to a minimum wage than have the baker or the candlestick maker; and when Mr. Hartshorn affirms that there is no argument applying to underground men which does not apply with equal force to men employed above ground, he is treading on dangerous ground, for to many the implication will be that the underground workers’ claim for the minimum was not based upon a genuine grievance. If the policy be now openly declared as a “ minimum wage for all,” we can only say that this was not the claim upon which Parliament gave a minimum wage to the miners. With regard to the other points raised, the Prime Minister was more reserved in his judgment, but he gave the deputation but small hope of acquiescence in their views. Thus, he pointed out that the ques- tion of the period for averaging wages was sub judice, and with respect to the burden of proof, he refused to commit himself. It would seem to us to be an elementary duty of the workman, who claims a minimum wage on account of some abnormality in his working place, to prove the existence of such conditions. But the object, we suppose, is gradually to eliminate the “ abnormal place” entirely. The employers cannot complain of Mr. Asquith's attitude. He reiterated his intention of hearing their point of view before making up his mind, and he repeatedly urged upon the deputation the advisa- bility of seeking to obtain satisfaction by negotiation. Had he been fully aware of the pourparlers that have already taken place in regard to nearly all the points brought to his notice on Tuesday, he would have placed still greater stress on this mode of procedure, for there are none of them that cannot better be dealt with uis-Dris. As to the Act itself, with the working of which the Premier expressed so much satisfaction, it is only necessary to observe that conditions have not yet arisen, owing to the permanence of good trade, which may be calculated severely to test its fundaments. It was perhaps inevitable that the Safety South Wales Miners’ Federation Proposals should consider the moment oppor- ill Hines. tune for bringing forward a number of proposals respecting the working of mines in the interests of greater safety under- ground. Nor can any reasonable objection be taken to the fact that these proposals have now been definitely formulated and sanctioned at the conference of delegates assembled this week at Cardiff. As far as the suggestions represent any really workable solution of the problems dealt with, they are entitled to receive due consideration. We print them in extenso in another column, and it is clear that so wide a range of practical mining questions is presented in these 17 paragraphs that it would not be possible to discuss their individual merits or demerits adequately in this article. In a general sense, one is struck by the fact that these proposals, one and all, are aimed at further regula- tion of the management of the pit. In not a single instance can we see any serious proposal to deal more effectively with the source of about two-thirds of colliery accidents—viz., those arising in connection with the working face, and connected with the due exercise of proper precautions by the miners them- selves. The suggestion to create a large staff of State- paid inspectors, to be selected by the workmen, and to give the workmen the right to appoint and control the colliery firemen, is in itself evidence of the spirit in which the recommendations have been evolved. With regard to the inspectorate, Mr. Brace on Wednesday explained to the Home Secretary exactly what was the view of the miners upon this point. As regards their number, he thought that each inspector should have not more than 5,000 men to look after, and that the salary of each need not exceed £200 a year. This would mean the increase of the staff of the inspectorate by something like 200 working-men inspectors. The Koyal Commission on Mines examined this question in great detail. The Bill promoted by the Miners’ Federation in 1907, in fact, contained a provision of this character, although it did not go so far as the present proposal. One of the arguments then put forward in favour of working- men inspectors was that more attention would thus be paid to the practical questions as distinct from the more scientific points involved in coalmining. Such men, it was argued, would be more in touch with the practical working of the pit and more open for consultation by the miners. On the other hand, there can be no question that the appointment of such a class of inspectors would be to lower the